评价用肉毒杆菌毒素治疗和不使用肉毒杆菌毒素治疗牙龈过度突出的唇重定位:一项随机临床试验。

Q3 Dentistry
Ola M Ghoniem, Gehan G Madkor, Mona S Darhous
{"title":"评价用肉毒杆菌毒素治疗和不使用肉毒杆菌毒素治疗牙龈过度突出的唇重定位:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Ola M Ghoniem, Gehan G Madkor, Mona S Darhous","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate and compare the treatment of excessive gingival display (EGD) with lip repositioning surgery (LRS), with or without presurgical Botox injection, using relapse as the primary outcome.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-two periodontally healthy patients with EGD were recruited and allocated into two equal groups. The intervention group (<i>n</i> = 11) underwent LRS with Botox preinjection into the smile muscles 1-2 weeks before surgery, while the control group (<i>n</i> = 11) underwent only LRS. Participants were assessed for changes in gingival display and lip length at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, as well as for pain and satisfaction. The data were recorded and statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The control group showed a statistically significant change in gingival display at 3 months (3.82 ± 2.09 mm) and 6 months (4.68 ± 1.72 mm) compared to baseline (5.91 ± 1.45 mm), but no significant changes at 9 months (5.55 ± 1.37 mm) and 12 months (5.64 ± 1.50 mm). The intervention group demonstrated a significant reduction in gingival display at 3 months (2.23 ± 1.29 mm) and 6 months (3.95 ± 1.39 mm), with stable results up to 12 months (4.27 ± 1.10 mm). The overall reduction in gingival display was significantly greater in the intervention group compared to the control group (1.86 mm, 0.27 mm, respectively). Patient satisfaction with the treatment was not significantly different between the two groups, except for willingness to repeat the procedure. Pain scores were significantly higher in the control group than in the Botox group at 24 h, with no significant differences at 3 and 7 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Botox pre-injection for LRS demonstrated its efficacy for management of EGD by enhancing lip length, reducing relapse, alleviating postoperative discomfort, and providing sustained results for 1 year.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This study addresses effective treatments for EGD, improving esthetics and confidence. By evaluating LRS with and without Botox, it offers practical insights that improves EGD and reduces relapse, resulting in increased patient satisfaction and sustained results over a year. How to cite this article: Ghoniem OM, Madkor GG, Darhous MS. Evaluating Lip Repositioning for the Treatment of Excess Gingival Display with and without Pretreatment with Botox: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(2):119-126.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"26 2","pages":"119-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Lip Repositioning for the Treatment of Excess Gingival Display with and without Pretreatment with Botox: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ola M Ghoniem, Gehan G Madkor, Mona S Darhous\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate and compare the treatment of excessive gingival display (EGD) with lip repositioning surgery (LRS), with or without presurgical Botox injection, using relapse as the primary outcome.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-two periodontally healthy patients with EGD were recruited and allocated into two equal groups. The intervention group (<i>n</i> = 11) underwent LRS with Botox preinjection into the smile muscles 1-2 weeks before surgery, while the control group (<i>n</i> = 11) underwent only LRS. Participants were assessed for changes in gingival display and lip length at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, as well as for pain and satisfaction. The data were recorded and statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The control group showed a statistically significant change in gingival display at 3 months (3.82 ± 2.09 mm) and 6 months (4.68 ± 1.72 mm) compared to baseline (5.91 ± 1.45 mm), but no significant changes at 9 months (5.55 ± 1.37 mm) and 12 months (5.64 ± 1.50 mm). The intervention group demonstrated a significant reduction in gingival display at 3 months (2.23 ± 1.29 mm) and 6 months (3.95 ± 1.39 mm), with stable results up to 12 months (4.27 ± 1.10 mm). The overall reduction in gingival display was significantly greater in the intervention group compared to the control group (1.86 mm, 0.27 mm, respectively). Patient satisfaction with the treatment was not significantly different between the two groups, except for willingness to repeat the procedure. Pain scores were significantly higher in the control group than in the Botox group at 24 h, with no significant differences at 3 and 7 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Botox pre-injection for LRS demonstrated its efficacy for management of EGD by enhancing lip length, reducing relapse, alleviating postoperative discomfort, and providing sustained results for 1 year.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This study addresses effective treatments for EGD, improving esthetics and confidence. By evaluating LRS with and without Botox, it offers practical insights that improves EGD and reduces relapse, resulting in increased patient satisfaction and sustained results over a year. How to cite this article: Ghoniem OM, Madkor GG, Darhous MS. Evaluating Lip Repositioning for the Treatment of Excess Gingival Display with and without Pretreatment with Botox: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(2):119-126.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"119-126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3831\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价和比较唇部复位手术(LRS)治疗牙龈过度显露(EGD),术前注射或不注射肉毒杆菌素,以复发为主要结局。材料与方法:选取牙周健康的EGD患者22例,随机分为两组。干预组(n = 11)在手术前1-2周对微笑肌进行肉毒杆菌预注射LRS,对照组(n = 11)只进行LRS。评估参与者在3、6、9和12个月时牙龈显示和嘴唇长度的变化,以及疼痛和满意度。记录数据并进行统计分析。结果:对照组3个月(3.82±2.09 mm)和6个月(4.68±1.72 mm)与基线(5.91±1.45 mm)比较有统计学意义,9个月(5.55±1.37 mm)和12个月(5.64±1.50 mm)无统计学意义。干预组在3个月(2.23±1.29 mm)和6个月(3.95±1.39 mm)时牙龈显示明显减少,并稳定到12个月(4.27±1.10 mm)。与对照组相比,干预组牙龈显示的整体缩小幅度更大(分别为1.86 mm和0.27 mm)。除了重复治疗的意愿外,两组患者对治疗的满意度无显著差异。在24 h时,对照组的疼痛评分明显高于肉毒杆菌组,在第3天和第7天无显著差异。结论:LRS预注射肉毒杆菌素对EGD的治疗效果良好,可延长唇长,减少复发,减轻术后不适,并提供持续1年的效果。临床意义:本研究探讨了EGD的有效治疗方法,改善了患者的审美和自信心。通过评估使用和不使用肉毒杆菌素的LRS,它提供了改善EGD和减少复发的实用见解,从而提高了患者满意度和持续一年的效果。gooniem m, Madkor GG, Darhous MS.:一项随机临床试验:肉毒杆菌毒素治疗牙龈过度突出的效果评价。现代医疗实践[J]; 2015;26(2):119-126。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Lip Repositioning for the Treatment of Excess Gingival Display with and without Pretreatment with Botox: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Objectives: To evaluate and compare the treatment of excessive gingival display (EGD) with lip repositioning surgery (LRS), with or without presurgical Botox injection, using relapse as the primary outcome.

Materials and methods: Twenty-two periodontally healthy patients with EGD were recruited and allocated into two equal groups. The intervention group (n = 11) underwent LRS with Botox preinjection into the smile muscles 1-2 weeks before surgery, while the control group (n = 11) underwent only LRS. Participants were assessed for changes in gingival display and lip length at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, as well as for pain and satisfaction. The data were recorded and statistically analyzed.

Results: The control group showed a statistically significant change in gingival display at 3 months (3.82 ± 2.09 mm) and 6 months (4.68 ± 1.72 mm) compared to baseline (5.91 ± 1.45 mm), but no significant changes at 9 months (5.55 ± 1.37 mm) and 12 months (5.64 ± 1.50 mm). The intervention group demonstrated a significant reduction in gingival display at 3 months (2.23 ± 1.29 mm) and 6 months (3.95 ± 1.39 mm), with stable results up to 12 months (4.27 ± 1.10 mm). The overall reduction in gingival display was significantly greater in the intervention group compared to the control group (1.86 mm, 0.27 mm, respectively). Patient satisfaction with the treatment was not significantly different between the two groups, except for willingness to repeat the procedure. Pain scores were significantly higher in the control group than in the Botox group at 24 h, with no significant differences at 3 and 7 days.

Conclusions: Botox pre-injection for LRS demonstrated its efficacy for management of EGD by enhancing lip length, reducing relapse, alleviating postoperative discomfort, and providing sustained results for 1 year.

Clinical significance: This study addresses effective treatments for EGD, improving esthetics and confidence. By evaluating LRS with and without Botox, it offers practical insights that improves EGD and reduces relapse, resulting in increased patient satisfaction and sustained results over a year. How to cite this article: Ghoniem OM, Madkor GG, Darhous MS. Evaluating Lip Repositioning for the Treatment of Excess Gingival Display with and without Pretreatment with Botox: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(2):119-126.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信