机器学习辅助MRI诊断帕金森病轻度认知障碍的准确性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Parkinson's Disease Pub Date : 2025-05-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/padi/2079341
Feng Zhang, Liangqing Guo, Lin Liu, Xiaochun Han
{"title":"机器学习辅助MRI诊断帕金森病轻度认知障碍的准确性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Feng Zhang, Liangqing Guo, Lin Liu, Xiaochun Han","doi":"10.1155/padi/2079341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of machine learning-assisted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting cognitive impairment among Parkinson's disease (PD) patients through a systematic review and meta-analysis. We systematically searched for studies that applied machine learning algorithms to MRI data for diagnosing PD with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI). Data were extracted and synthesized to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative diagnostic likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR). A bivariate random-effects model and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were employed for statistical analysis. The quality of studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) instrument. The publication bias was investigated through Deeks' funnel plot. All statistical analyses were conducted using Stata 14.0. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing PD-MCI using machine learning-assisted MRI were 0.82 (95% CI: 0.75-0.87) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.73-0.87), respectively. The PLR was 4.28 (95% CI: 2.93-6.27), and the NLR was 0.23 (95% CI: 0.16-0.32), indicating a high diagnostic accuracy. The area under the curve (AUC) for the SROC was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.82-0.88). Quality assessment using the QUADAS-2 tool showed a predominantly low risk of bias among the studies, and the Deeks' funnel plot suggested no significant publication bias (<i>p</i>=0.30). In summary, the MRI combined with machine learning for diagnosing PD-MCI achieved high accuracy with the pooled sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 81%.</p>","PeriodicalId":19907,"journal":{"name":"Parkinson's Disease","volume":"2025 ","pages":"2079341"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12122149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning-Assisted MRI for Mild Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Feng Zhang, Liangqing Guo, Lin Liu, Xiaochun Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/padi/2079341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of machine learning-assisted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting cognitive impairment among Parkinson's disease (PD) patients through a systematic review and meta-analysis. We systematically searched for studies that applied machine learning algorithms to MRI data for diagnosing PD with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI). Data were extracted and synthesized to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative diagnostic likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR). A bivariate random-effects model and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were employed for statistical analysis. The quality of studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) instrument. The publication bias was investigated through Deeks' funnel plot. All statistical analyses were conducted using Stata 14.0. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing PD-MCI using machine learning-assisted MRI were 0.82 (95% CI: 0.75-0.87) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.73-0.87), respectively. The PLR was 4.28 (95% CI: 2.93-6.27), and the NLR was 0.23 (95% CI: 0.16-0.32), indicating a high diagnostic accuracy. The area under the curve (AUC) for the SROC was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.82-0.88). Quality assessment using the QUADAS-2 tool showed a predominantly low risk of bias among the studies, and the Deeks' funnel plot suggested no significant publication bias (<i>p</i>=0.30). In summary, the MRI combined with machine learning for diagnosing PD-MCI achieved high accuracy with the pooled sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 81%.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Parkinson's Disease\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"2079341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12122149/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Parkinson's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/padi/2079341\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parkinson's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/padi/2079341","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过系统综述和荟萃分析,评估机器学习辅助磁共振成像(MRI)检测帕金森病(PD)患者认知功能障碍的诊断准确性。我们系统地检索了将机器学习算法应用于MRI数据诊断PD合并轻度认知障碍(PD- mci)的研究。提取并综合数据,计算合并敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性诊断似然比(NLR)和诊断优势比(DOR)。采用双变量随机效应模型和综合受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线进行统计分析。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估(QUADAS-2)仪器评估研究质量。采用Deeks漏斗图调查发表偏倚。所有统计分析均使用Stata 14.0进行。使用机器学习辅助MRI诊断PD-MCI的总敏感性和特异性分别为0.82 (95% CI: 0.75-0.87)和0.81 (95% CI: 0.73-0.87)。PLR为4.28 (95% CI: 2.93-6.27), NLR为0.23 (95% CI: 0.16-0.32),诊断准确性较高。SROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.85 (95% CI: 0.82-0.88)。使用QUADAS-2工具进行的质量评估显示,这些研究的偏倚风险明显较低,Deeks漏斗图显示没有显著的发表偏倚(p=0.30)。综上所述,MRI结合机器学习诊断PD-MCI的准确率较高,总灵敏度为82%,特异性为81%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning-Assisted MRI for Mild Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of machine learning-assisted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting cognitive impairment among Parkinson's disease (PD) patients through a systematic review and meta-analysis. We systematically searched for studies that applied machine learning algorithms to MRI data for diagnosing PD with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI). Data were extracted and synthesized to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative diagnostic likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR). A bivariate random-effects model and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were employed for statistical analysis. The quality of studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) instrument. The publication bias was investigated through Deeks' funnel plot. All statistical analyses were conducted using Stata 14.0. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing PD-MCI using machine learning-assisted MRI were 0.82 (95% CI: 0.75-0.87) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.73-0.87), respectively. The PLR was 4.28 (95% CI: 2.93-6.27), and the NLR was 0.23 (95% CI: 0.16-0.32), indicating a high diagnostic accuracy. The area under the curve (AUC) for the SROC was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.82-0.88). Quality assessment using the QUADAS-2 tool showed a predominantly low risk of bias among the studies, and the Deeks' funnel plot suggested no significant publication bias (p=0.30). In summary, the MRI combined with machine learning for diagnosing PD-MCI achieved high accuracy with the pooled sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 81%.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson's Disease CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Parkinson’s Disease is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, genetics, cellular, molecular and neurophysiology, as well as the diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson’s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信