Gretty Alonso-Martínez, Marine Ortiz-Magdaleno, Norma Verónica Zabala-Alonso, Paula Sánchez-Robles, Mariana Gutiérrez-Sánchez, Juan Carlos Flores-Arriaga, Gabriel Fernando Romo-Ramírez
{"title":"化学-物理预处理组合对聚醚醚酮与树脂复合材料粘接的影响。","authors":"Gretty Alonso-Martínez, Marine Ortiz-Magdaleno, Norma Verónica Zabala-Alonso, Paula Sánchez-Robles, Mariana Gutiérrez-Sánchez, Juan Carlos Flores-Arriaga, Gabriel Fernando Romo-Ramírez","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Surface pretreatment of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is necessary to increase the bond strength between PEEK and veneering materials. The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of a combination of chemical and physical pretreatments on the surface of PEEK for the adhesion of resin composite.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Five pretreatments were evaluated: grit-blasting (Al2O3), grit-blasting (Al2O3)+primer adhesive, 98% sulfuric acid, 98% sulfuric acid+primer adhesive, and an untreated control. The PEEK surface was evaluated with a scanning electron microscope, and the tensile bond strength (TBS) of the PEEK with the veneering resin composite interface was measured with a universal test machine at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. The failure was categorized as adhesive, cohesive or mixed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pretreatment with grit-blasting+primer adhesive obtained the highest mean ± standard deviation TBS value (19.10±1.70 MPa) followed by 98% sulfuric acid+primer adhesive (17.90±1.20 MPa), while the pretreatments with grit-blasting (13.97±2.33 MPa) and 98% sulfuric acid (12.18±0.70 MPa) showed the lowest values. All pretreatments showed statistically significant differences with respect to the untreated PEEK control and the combined pretreatments with respect to the pretreatment with grit-blasting and 98% sulfuric acid (p≤0.05). A higher number of adhesive failures were observed except in the grit-blasting+primer adhesive group, which had 80% mixed failures. No cohesive failures were seen.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of chemical-physical pretreatments induced an increased in the TBS values between PEEK and resin composite because of the topographical roughness and the micro-mechanical anchoring in the PEEK surface.</p>","PeriodicalId":94215,"journal":{"name":"Stomatologija","volume":"26 1","pages":"12-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of the combination of chemical-physical pretreatments for bonding PEEK to resin composites.\",\"authors\":\"Gretty Alonso-Martínez, Marine Ortiz-Magdaleno, Norma Verónica Zabala-Alonso, Paula Sánchez-Robles, Mariana Gutiérrez-Sánchez, Juan Carlos Flores-Arriaga, Gabriel Fernando Romo-Ramírez\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Surface pretreatment of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is necessary to increase the bond strength between PEEK and veneering materials. The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of a combination of chemical and physical pretreatments on the surface of PEEK for the adhesion of resin composite.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Five pretreatments were evaluated: grit-blasting (Al2O3), grit-blasting (Al2O3)+primer adhesive, 98% sulfuric acid, 98% sulfuric acid+primer adhesive, and an untreated control. The PEEK surface was evaluated with a scanning electron microscope, and the tensile bond strength (TBS) of the PEEK with the veneering resin composite interface was measured with a universal test machine at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. The failure was categorized as adhesive, cohesive or mixed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pretreatment with grit-blasting+primer adhesive obtained the highest mean ± standard deviation TBS value (19.10±1.70 MPa) followed by 98% sulfuric acid+primer adhesive (17.90±1.20 MPa), while the pretreatments with grit-blasting (13.97±2.33 MPa) and 98% sulfuric acid (12.18±0.70 MPa) showed the lowest values. All pretreatments showed statistically significant differences with respect to the untreated PEEK control and the combined pretreatments with respect to the pretreatment with grit-blasting and 98% sulfuric acid (p≤0.05). A higher number of adhesive failures were observed except in the grit-blasting+primer adhesive group, which had 80% mixed failures. No cohesive failures were seen.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of chemical-physical pretreatments induced an increased in the TBS values between PEEK and resin composite because of the topographical roughness and the micro-mechanical anchoring in the PEEK surface.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stomatologija\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"12-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stomatologija\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stomatologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of the combination of chemical-physical pretreatments for bonding PEEK to resin composites.
Objective: Surface pretreatment of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is necessary to increase the bond strength between PEEK and veneering materials. The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of a combination of chemical and physical pretreatments on the surface of PEEK for the adhesion of resin composite.
Materials and methods: Five pretreatments were evaluated: grit-blasting (Al2O3), grit-blasting (Al2O3)+primer adhesive, 98% sulfuric acid, 98% sulfuric acid+primer adhesive, and an untreated control. The PEEK surface was evaluated with a scanning electron microscope, and the tensile bond strength (TBS) of the PEEK with the veneering resin composite interface was measured with a universal test machine at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. The failure was categorized as adhesive, cohesive or mixed.
Results: Pretreatment with grit-blasting+primer adhesive obtained the highest mean ± standard deviation TBS value (19.10±1.70 MPa) followed by 98% sulfuric acid+primer adhesive (17.90±1.20 MPa), while the pretreatments with grit-blasting (13.97±2.33 MPa) and 98% sulfuric acid (12.18±0.70 MPa) showed the lowest values. All pretreatments showed statistically significant differences with respect to the untreated PEEK control and the combined pretreatments with respect to the pretreatment with grit-blasting and 98% sulfuric acid (p≤0.05). A higher number of adhesive failures were observed except in the grit-blasting+primer adhesive group, which had 80% mixed failures. No cohesive failures were seen.
Conclusion: The combination of chemical-physical pretreatments induced an increased in the TBS values between PEEK and resin composite because of the topographical roughness and the micro-mechanical anchoring in the PEEK surface.