种植体周围炎线性测量的类内相关性的CBCT验证研究:一项观察性研究。

IF 1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research Pub Date : 2025-03-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5037/jomr.2025.16104
Amanda Beatriz Rodriguez, Berceste Guler Ayyildiz, Halil Ayyildiz, Aniruddh Narvekar, Mohammed H Elnagar, Michael Schmerman, Grace Viana, Salvador Nares, Tolga Fikret Tözüm
{"title":"种植体周围炎线性测量的类内相关性的CBCT验证研究:一项观察性研究。","authors":"Amanda Beatriz Rodriguez, Berceste Guler Ayyildiz, Halil Ayyildiz, Aniruddh Narvekar, Mohammed H Elnagar, Michael Schmerman, Grace Viana, Salvador Nares, Tolga Fikret Tözüm","doi":"10.5037/jomr.2025.16104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This retrospective observational study aimed to evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of intra-examiner and inter-examiner bone loss measurements in cone-beam computed tomography images over time, on patients with peri-implant defects using two cone-beam computed tomography software programs: 3D Slicer and Dolphin Imaging.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Baseline images were oriented based on implant location and aligned with the palatal or Go-Me plane. Two CBCT volumes were imported and superimposed using landmark-based and surface-based methods, with accuracy assessed through 3D and 2D matching. Measurements of implant diameter, length, and bone thickness at 0, 1, 3, and 5 mm intervals were taken at two-time points by three independent examiners, with reliability assessed using intra-class correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty measurements per 14 cases were evaluated. Each examiner conducted 1,120 measurements with a cumulative total of 3,360 measurements assessed. Significant differences in measurement times were observed, with 3D Slicer requiring more time for superimposition tasks (P < 0.001). Both software programs, however, demonstrated high reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.80) in inter- and intra-examiner agreement across various bone measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings emphasize that the high reliability observed with the software and superimposition techniques is directly linked to the calibration and training exercises conducted with the examiners before the study. Dolphin's Imaging automated superimposition was significantly faster than 3D Slicer's manual approach, 3D Slicer offered superior image quality and better differentiation of bone outlines. Both software demonstrated effectiveness in delivering consistent and reproducible measurements, with significant implications for clinical and research applications in implant dentistry.</p>","PeriodicalId":53254,"journal":{"name":"eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research","volume":"16 1","pages":"e4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12118470/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CBCT Validation Study on Intraclass Correlation for Linear Measurements in Peri-implantitis: an Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Beatriz Rodriguez, Berceste Guler Ayyildiz, Halil Ayyildiz, Aniruddh Narvekar, Mohammed H Elnagar, Michael Schmerman, Grace Viana, Salvador Nares, Tolga Fikret Tözüm\",\"doi\":\"10.5037/jomr.2025.16104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This retrospective observational study aimed to evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of intra-examiner and inter-examiner bone loss measurements in cone-beam computed tomography images over time, on patients with peri-implant defects using two cone-beam computed tomography software programs: 3D Slicer and Dolphin Imaging.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Baseline images were oriented based on implant location and aligned with the palatal or Go-Me plane. Two CBCT volumes were imported and superimposed using landmark-based and surface-based methods, with accuracy assessed through 3D and 2D matching. Measurements of implant diameter, length, and bone thickness at 0, 1, 3, and 5 mm intervals were taken at two-time points by three independent examiners, with reliability assessed using intra-class correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty measurements per 14 cases were evaluated. Each examiner conducted 1,120 measurements with a cumulative total of 3,360 measurements assessed. Significant differences in measurement times were observed, with 3D Slicer requiring more time for superimposition tasks (P < 0.001). Both software programs, however, demonstrated high reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.80) in inter- and intra-examiner agreement across various bone measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings emphasize that the high reliability observed with the software and superimposition techniques is directly linked to the calibration and training exercises conducted with the examiners before the study. Dolphin's Imaging automated superimposition was significantly faster than 3D Slicer's manual approach, 3D Slicer offered superior image quality and better differentiation of bone outlines. Both software demonstrated effectiveness in delivering consistent and reproducible measurements, with significant implications for clinical and research applications in implant dentistry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"e4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12118470/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2025.16104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2025.16104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本回顾性观察性研究旨在通过使用两种锥形束计算机断层扫描软件程序:3D切片器和海豚成像,评估植入体周围缺损患者在检查者内和检查者间锥形束计算机断层扫描图像中骨丢失测量随时间的可靠性和可重复性。材料和方法:基线图像根据种植体位置定位并与腭面或Go-Me平面对齐。导入两个CBCT体,并使用基于地标和基于表面的方法进行叠加,通过3D和2D匹配评估准确性。由三名独立的检查人员在两个时间点分别以0,1,3和5mm的间隔测量种植体直径,长度和骨厚度,并使用类内相关系数评估可靠性。结果:每14例进行20次测量。每位审查员进行了1,120次测量,累计评估了3,360次测量。在测量时间上观察到显著差异,3D切片机需要更多的时间来完成叠加任务(P < 0.001)。然而,这两种软件程序在不同骨骼测量的检查者之间和检查者内部一致性方面显示出高可靠性(类内相关系数>.80)。结论:研究结果强调,通过软件和叠加技术观察到的高可靠性与研究前与审查员进行的校准和培训演习直接相关。Dolphin's Imaging的自动叠加明显快于3D Slicer的手动方法,3D Slicer提供了更好的图像质量和更好的骨轮廓区分。这两款软件都证明了在提供一致和可重复的测量方面的有效性,对种植牙科的临床和研究应用具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CBCT Validation Study on Intraclass Correlation for Linear Measurements in Peri-implantitis: an Observational Study.

Objectives: This retrospective observational study aimed to evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of intra-examiner and inter-examiner bone loss measurements in cone-beam computed tomography images over time, on patients with peri-implant defects using two cone-beam computed tomography software programs: 3D Slicer and Dolphin Imaging.

Material and methods: Baseline images were oriented based on implant location and aligned with the palatal or Go-Me plane. Two CBCT volumes were imported and superimposed using landmark-based and surface-based methods, with accuracy assessed through 3D and 2D matching. Measurements of implant diameter, length, and bone thickness at 0, 1, 3, and 5 mm intervals were taken at two-time points by three independent examiners, with reliability assessed using intra-class correlation coefficients.

Results: Twenty measurements per 14 cases were evaluated. Each examiner conducted 1,120 measurements with a cumulative total of 3,360 measurements assessed. Significant differences in measurement times were observed, with 3D Slicer requiring more time for superimposition tasks (P < 0.001). Both software programs, however, demonstrated high reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.80) in inter- and intra-examiner agreement across various bone measurements.

Conclusions: Findings emphasize that the high reliability observed with the software and superimposition techniques is directly linked to the calibration and training exercises conducted with the examiners before the study. Dolphin's Imaging automated superimposition was significantly faster than 3D Slicer's manual approach, 3D Slicer offered superior image quality and better differentiation of bone outlines. Both software demonstrated effectiveness in delivering consistent and reproducible measurements, with significant implications for clinical and research applications in implant dentistry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信