小儿多发性硬化症的优化治疗。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-30 DOI:10.1080/14737175.2025.2508777
Nail Benallegue, Fabien Rollot, David-Axel Laplaud
{"title":"小儿多发性硬化症的优化治疗。","authors":"Nail Benallegue, Fabien Rollot, David-Axel Laplaud","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2025.2508777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) differs from adult MS in its clinical characteristics and disease course. POMS exhibits a heightened inflammatory activity with higher relapse rates and lesion load, alongside less early physical disability but more pronounced cognitive impairment and impaired brain growth.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review examines treatment strategy in POMS based on safety and efficacy data from observational studies and randomized controlled trials. This article is based on a literature search conducted using MEDLINE and Google Scholar for the period of 2000 to 2024.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>High-efficacy therapies, including fingolimod, natalizumab, and anti-CD20 therapies, have demonstrated superior disease control and disability prevention. Early initiation of HET is increasingly recommended to optimize outcomes and preserve quality of life.Low/moderate-efficacy therapies, such as interferons, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate should be reserved for patients with mild disease. While long-term safety data, personalized prognostic markers and de-escalation strategies are still needed, high-efficacy therapies provide a promising standard of care, especially given enhanced neuroinflammatory activity in POMS. Future research should prioritize strategies to balance disease control with adverse effects (AEs), accounting for aging and individual disease trajectories, to improve long-term quality of life in POMS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"819-855"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing treatment for pediatric multiple sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"Nail Benallegue, Fabien Rollot, David-Axel Laplaud\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737175.2025.2508777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) differs from adult MS in its clinical characteristics and disease course. POMS exhibits a heightened inflammatory activity with higher relapse rates and lesion load, alongside less early physical disability but more pronounced cognitive impairment and impaired brain growth.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review examines treatment strategy in POMS based on safety and efficacy data from observational studies and randomized controlled trials. This article is based on a literature search conducted using MEDLINE and Google Scholar for the period of 2000 to 2024.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>High-efficacy therapies, including fingolimod, natalizumab, and anti-CD20 therapies, have demonstrated superior disease control and disability prevention. Early initiation of HET is increasingly recommended to optimize outcomes and preserve quality of life.Low/moderate-efficacy therapies, such as interferons, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate should be reserved for patients with mild disease. While long-term safety data, personalized prognostic markers and de-escalation strategies are still needed, high-efficacy therapies provide a promising standard of care, especially given enhanced neuroinflammatory activity in POMS. Future research should prioritize strategies to balance disease control with adverse effects (AEs), accounting for aging and individual disease trajectories, to improve long-term quality of life in POMS patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"819-855\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2025.2508777\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2025.2508777","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

儿科起病多发性硬化症(POMS)不同于成人多发性硬化症的临床特征和病程。POMS表现出更高的炎症活性、复发率和损伤负荷,伴随较少的身体残疾,但更明显的认知障碍和大脑发育受损。涵盖领域:本综述基于观察性研究和随机对照试验的安全性和有效性数据,对POMS的治疗策略进行了审查。本文基于使用MEDLINE和b谷歌Scholar进行的2020 - 2024年的文献检索。专家意见:高效疗法,包括芬戈莫、那他珠单抗和抗cd20疗法,已经证明了优越的疾病控制和残疾预防。越来越多的人建议尽早开始HET治疗,以优化预后并保持生活质量。低/中效治疗,如干扰素、醋酸格拉替雷默、特立氟米特、富马酸二甲酯等,应保留给病情较轻的患者。虽然仍然需要长期的安全性数据、个性化的预后标志物和降级策略,但高效的治疗提供了一个有希望的标准治疗,特别是考虑到POMS的神经炎症活性增强。未来的研究应优先考虑平衡疾病控制和不良反应(ae)的策略,考虑老龄化和个体疾病轨迹,以改善POMS患者的长期生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing treatment for pediatric multiple sclerosis.

Introduction: Pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) differs from adult MS in its clinical characteristics and disease course. POMS exhibits a heightened inflammatory activity with higher relapse rates and lesion load, alongside less early physical disability but more pronounced cognitive impairment and impaired brain growth.

Areas covered: This review examines treatment strategy in POMS based on safety and efficacy data from observational studies and randomized controlled trials. This article is based on a literature search conducted using MEDLINE and Google Scholar for the period of 2000 to 2024.

Expert opinion: High-efficacy therapies, including fingolimod, natalizumab, and anti-CD20 therapies, have demonstrated superior disease control and disability prevention. Early initiation of HET is increasingly recommended to optimize outcomes and preserve quality of life.Low/moderate-efficacy therapies, such as interferons, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate should be reserved for patients with mild disease. While long-term safety data, personalized prognostic markers and de-escalation strategies are still needed, high-efficacy therapies provide a promising standard of care, especially given enhanced neuroinflammatory activity in POMS. Future research should prioritize strategies to balance disease control with adverse effects (AEs), accounting for aging and individual disease trajectories, to improve long-term quality of life in POMS patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (ISSN 1473-7175) provides expert reviews on the use of drugs and medicines in clinical neurology and neuropsychiatry. Coverage includes disease management, new medicines and drugs in neurology, therapeutic indications, diagnostics, medical treatment guidelines and neurological diseases such as stroke, epilepsy, Alzheimer''s and Parkinson''s. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信