Venkatesh Bhogi, Santhosh Kumar, Sreenivasa M Reddy, Lalit Kumar
{"title":"含5%焦磷酸盐牙膏与标准含氟牙膏抑制牙石形成的比较评价:单盲随机对照临床试验。","authors":"Venkatesh Bhogi, Santhosh Kumar, Sreenivasa M Reddy, Lalit Kumar","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study compared the quantitative assessments of calculus before and after using 5% pyrophosphate-containing toothpaste and fluoridated toothpaste.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A set of mouth mirrors, UNC-15 periodontal probes, 5% pyrophosphate-containing toothpaste, fluoridated toothpaste, and soft-bristled toothbrushes were used. The indices used were the Volpe-Manhold index (VMI), gingival index (GI), and plaque index (PI). The sample size was calculated using the independent sample <i>t</i>-test. Simple block randomization was followed. A <i>p</i>-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Out of the 35 patients who participated, 62.85% were male and 37.14% were female, with a mean age of 26.3 years. The VMI scores in both male and female subjects decreased over 6- and 12-weeks intervals, irrespective of their enrollment in control or test groups, but it did not show a statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.271).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a decrease in the GI scores over 6- and 12-weeks intervals, and it was not statistically significant in the test group as compared with the control group (<i>p</i> = 0.223). There was also a decrease in the PI scores over 6- and 12-weeks intervals. In the test group, PI scores were better and statistically significant than those of the control group (<i>p</i> = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A 5% pyrophosphate-containing dentifrice, used twice daily for 2 minutes for 3 months compared with a fluoridated dentifrice, did not cause a statistically significant difference in calculus reduction.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Pyrophosphate is largely used due to its capacity to inhibit the mineralization of plaque and calculus formation on enamel, but well-controlled studies are meager on a 5% concentration. Therefore, it is important to develop studies focused on the capacity of the pyrophosphate to inhibit calculus formation. How to cite this article: Bhogi V, Kumar S, Reddy MS, <i>et al.</i> Comparative Evaluation of 5% Pyrophosphate-containing Toothpaste with a Standard Fluoridated Toothpaste in the Inhibition of Calculus Formation: A Single-blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(2):144-150.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"26 2","pages":"144-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Evaluation of 5% Pyrophosphate-containing Toothpaste with a Standard Fluoridated Toothpaste in the Inhibition of Calculus Formation: A Single-blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Venkatesh Bhogi, Santhosh Kumar, Sreenivasa M Reddy, Lalit Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3818\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study compared the quantitative assessments of calculus before and after using 5% pyrophosphate-containing toothpaste and fluoridated toothpaste.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A set of mouth mirrors, UNC-15 periodontal probes, 5% pyrophosphate-containing toothpaste, fluoridated toothpaste, and soft-bristled toothbrushes were used. The indices used were the Volpe-Manhold index (VMI), gingival index (GI), and plaque index (PI). The sample size was calculated using the independent sample <i>t</i>-test. Simple block randomization was followed. A <i>p</i>-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Out of the 35 patients who participated, 62.85% were male and 37.14% were female, with a mean age of 26.3 years. The VMI scores in both male and female subjects decreased over 6- and 12-weeks intervals, irrespective of their enrollment in control or test groups, but it did not show a statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.271).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a decrease in the GI scores over 6- and 12-weeks intervals, and it was not statistically significant in the test group as compared with the control group (<i>p</i> = 0.223). There was also a decrease in the PI scores over 6- and 12-weeks intervals. In the test group, PI scores were better and statistically significant than those of the control group (<i>p</i> = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A 5% pyrophosphate-containing dentifrice, used twice daily for 2 minutes for 3 months compared with a fluoridated dentifrice, did not cause a statistically significant difference in calculus reduction.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Pyrophosphate is largely used due to its capacity to inhibit the mineralization of plaque and calculus formation on enamel, but well-controlled studies are meager on a 5% concentration. Therefore, it is important to develop studies focused on the capacity of the pyrophosphate to inhibit calculus formation. How to cite this article: Bhogi V, Kumar S, Reddy MS, <i>et al.</i> Comparative Evaluation of 5% Pyrophosphate-containing Toothpaste with a Standard Fluoridated Toothpaste in the Inhibition of Calculus Formation: A Single-blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(2):144-150.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"144-150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3818\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Evaluation of 5% Pyrophosphate-containing Toothpaste with a Standard Fluoridated Toothpaste in the Inhibition of Calculus Formation: A Single-blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Aim: This study compared the quantitative assessments of calculus before and after using 5% pyrophosphate-containing toothpaste and fluoridated toothpaste.
Materials and methods: A set of mouth mirrors, UNC-15 periodontal probes, 5% pyrophosphate-containing toothpaste, fluoridated toothpaste, and soft-bristled toothbrushes were used. The indices used were the Volpe-Manhold index (VMI), gingival index (GI), and plaque index (PI). The sample size was calculated using the independent sample t-test. Simple block randomization was followed. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Out of the 35 patients who participated, 62.85% were male and 37.14% were female, with a mean age of 26.3 years. The VMI scores in both male and female subjects decreased over 6- and 12-weeks intervals, irrespective of their enrollment in control or test groups, but it did not show a statistically significant difference (p = 0.271).
Results: There was a decrease in the GI scores over 6- and 12-weeks intervals, and it was not statistically significant in the test group as compared with the control group (p = 0.223). There was also a decrease in the PI scores over 6- and 12-weeks intervals. In the test group, PI scores were better and statistically significant than those of the control group (p = 0.006).
Conclusion: A 5% pyrophosphate-containing dentifrice, used twice daily for 2 minutes for 3 months compared with a fluoridated dentifrice, did not cause a statistically significant difference in calculus reduction.
Clinical significance: Pyrophosphate is largely used due to its capacity to inhibit the mineralization of plaque and calculus formation on enamel, but well-controlled studies are meager on a 5% concentration. Therefore, it is important to develop studies focused on the capacity of the pyrophosphate to inhibit calculus formation. How to cite this article: Bhogi V, Kumar S, Reddy MS, et al. Comparative Evaluation of 5% Pyrophosphate-containing Toothpaste with a Standard Fluoridated Toothpaste in the Inhibition of Calculus Formation: A Single-blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(2):144-150.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.