RCPNEOPERU试验:一项集群随机试点试验,评估传统新生儿复苏与偏远地区部分虚拟训练的比较。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Carlos A Delgado, Enrique Gómez Pomar, Pablo Velásquez, Víctor Sánchez, Roberto Shimabuku, Luis Huicho
{"title":"RCPNEOPERU试验:一项集群随机试点试验,评估传统新生儿复苏与偏远地区部分虚拟训练的比较。","authors":"Carlos A Delgado, Enrique Gómez Pomar, Pablo Velásquez, Víctor Sánchez, Roberto Shimabuku, Luis Huicho","doi":"10.1016/j.jped.2025.04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effects of a neonatal resuscitation training program using traditional training and partial distance learning.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Through an open cluster-randomized trial, the authors compared a traditional approach involving face-to-face theory and practice sessions using information and communication technology to offer theory and distance examination, followed by face-to-face practice. Twelve health facilities were allocated by blocked randomization. Comparisons were made adjusting for clustering in qualitative and quantitative data. The primary outcome was the percentage of infants with heart rates ≥100 per minute at the second minute after birth. The authors performed a cluster-level analysis for cluster randomized trials, simplifying the adjustment for individual- and cluster-level covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The authors trained 403 health professionals in 2 p.m. in twelve facilities. After six months, the authors assessed 2180 birth deliveries, 966 newborns in the traditional training group (TT), and 1214 in the partial distance learning training group (pDL). The authors found no statistical evidence favoring any of the two trial arms (RR = 0.9859, CI 95 % = 0.9446; 1.0292, p = 0.4819).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The authors found no statistical evidence favoring traditional or distance learning methods for neonatal resuscitation training. Further research could assess improved online platforms to enable sustainable virtual reality instructor/provider interaction for theory, practice and testing, addressed to health cadres of rural and remote areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":14867,"journal":{"name":"Jornal de pediatria","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RCPNEOPERU trial: a cluster randomized pilot trial to assess traditional neonatal resuscitation compared to partially virtual training in remote areas.\",\"authors\":\"Carlos A Delgado, Enrique Gómez Pomar, Pablo Velásquez, Víctor Sánchez, Roberto Shimabuku, Luis Huicho\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jped.2025.04.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effects of a neonatal resuscitation training program using traditional training and partial distance learning.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Through an open cluster-randomized trial, the authors compared a traditional approach involving face-to-face theory and practice sessions using information and communication technology to offer theory and distance examination, followed by face-to-face practice. Twelve health facilities were allocated by blocked randomization. Comparisons were made adjusting for clustering in qualitative and quantitative data. The primary outcome was the percentage of infants with heart rates ≥100 per minute at the second minute after birth. The authors performed a cluster-level analysis for cluster randomized trials, simplifying the adjustment for individual- and cluster-level covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The authors trained 403 health professionals in 2 p.m. in twelve facilities. After six months, the authors assessed 2180 birth deliveries, 966 newborns in the traditional training group (TT), and 1214 in the partial distance learning training group (pDL). The authors found no statistical evidence favoring any of the two trial arms (RR = 0.9859, CI 95 % = 0.9446; 1.0292, p = 0.4819).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The authors found no statistical evidence favoring traditional or distance learning methods for neonatal resuscitation training. Further research could assess improved online platforms to enable sustainable virtual reality instructor/provider interaction for theory, practice and testing, addressed to health cadres of rural and remote areas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jornal de pediatria\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jornal de pediatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2025.04.008\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal de pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2025.04.008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价采用传统训练和部分远程学习相结合的新生儿复苏训练方案的效果。方法:采用开放聚类随机试验的方法,比较了采用信息通信技术提供理论和远程考试,再进行面对面实践的传统方法。12个卫生设施采用封锁随机分配。对定性和定量数据进行聚类调整后的比较。主要终点是出生后第二分钟心率≥100 /分钟的婴儿百分比。作者对聚类随机试验进行了聚类水平分析,简化了个体和聚类水平协变量的调整。结果:作者在下午2点培训了12个机构的403名卫生专业人员。六个月后,作者评估了2180例分娩,966例新生儿在传统训练组(TT), 1214例新生儿在部分远程学习训练组(pDL)。作者未发现统计学证据支持两个试验组中的任何一个(RR = 0.9859,CI 95 % = 0.9446;1.0292, p = 0.4819)。结论:作者没有发现支持传统或远程学习方法进行新生儿复苏训练的统计证据。进一步的研究可以评估改进的在线平台,以实现面向农村和偏远地区卫生干部的理论、实践和测试的可持续虚拟现实讲师/提供者互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
RCPNEOPERU trial: a cluster randomized pilot trial to assess traditional neonatal resuscitation compared to partially virtual training in remote areas.

Objective: To assess the effects of a neonatal resuscitation training program using traditional training and partial distance learning.

Method: Through an open cluster-randomized trial, the authors compared a traditional approach involving face-to-face theory and practice sessions using information and communication technology to offer theory and distance examination, followed by face-to-face practice. Twelve health facilities were allocated by blocked randomization. Comparisons were made adjusting for clustering in qualitative and quantitative data. The primary outcome was the percentage of infants with heart rates ≥100 per minute at the second minute after birth. The authors performed a cluster-level analysis for cluster randomized trials, simplifying the adjustment for individual- and cluster-level covariates.

Results: The authors trained 403 health professionals in 2 p.m. in twelve facilities. After six months, the authors assessed 2180 birth deliveries, 966 newborns in the traditional training group (TT), and 1214 in the partial distance learning training group (pDL). The authors found no statistical evidence favoring any of the two trial arms (RR = 0.9859, CI 95 % = 0.9446; 1.0292, p = 0.4819).

Conclusions: The authors found no statistical evidence favoring traditional or distance learning methods for neonatal resuscitation training. Further research could assess improved online platforms to enable sustainable virtual reality instructor/provider interaction for theory, practice and testing, addressed to health cadres of rural and remote areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jornal de pediatria
Jornal de pediatria 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
93
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Jornal de Pediatria is a bimonthly publication of the Brazilian Society of Pediatrics (Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria, SBP). It has been published without interruption since 1934. Jornal de Pediatria publishes original articles and review articles covering various areas in the field of pediatrics. By publishing relevant scientific contributions, Jornal de Pediatria aims at improving the standards of pediatrics and of the healthcare provided for children and adolescents in general, as well to foster debate about health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信