创伤浸润囊包神经阻滞与改良腹股沟上筋膜髂阻滞对成年全髋关节置换术患者术后镇痛效果的随机临床试验

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-05-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S517578
Ying Huang, Sheng Peng, Jun Wang, Lang Liu, Chun-Shan Dong
{"title":"创伤浸润囊包神经阻滞与改良腹股沟上筋膜髂阻滞对成年全髋关节置换术患者术后镇痛效果的随机临床试验","authors":"Ying Huang, Sheng Peng, Jun Wang, Lang Liu, Chun-Shan Dong","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S517578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block (S-FICB) provides incomplete analgesia for total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to anatomical limitations. This study compares two modified approaches-PENG block with wound infiltration (WI) and a modified S-FICB-to identify the optimal analgesic technique for THA.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Eighty-six subjects were randomly allocated to either the PENG block + WI group or the modified S-FICB group. The primary outcome was the postoperative numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores (rest/hip adduction) at 6 hours. The secondary outcomes were pain scores at 12, 24, 48 hours postoperatively and postoperative day 5, the incidence of postoperative quadriceps motor block at 6, 12, 24, 48 hours and postoperative day 5, the mean blood pressure (MAP) at five time points, patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) usage and adverse effects such as the incidence of rescue analgesia, local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), postoperative hip infection, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) within 5 days after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PENG + WI group had lower NRS at rest (6h) (95% CI 0.51-1.64, p<0.001). Compared with the PENG block + WI, the modified S-FICB resulted in a higher incidence of quadriceps motor block at 6 hours (82.1% vs 25.6%; OR=13.257, 95% CI 4.46-39.38; p<0.001) and 12 hours (71.8% vs 41%; OR=3.659, 95% CI 1.42-9.42; p=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PENG block + WI provides sufficient postoperative analgesia with no quadriceps motor block compared to modified S-FICB, supporting early ambulation and in line with the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"2679-2688"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12120252/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block with Wound Infiltration vs Modified Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca Block on Postoperative Analgesia in Adult Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty - A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ying Huang, Sheng Peng, Jun Wang, Lang Liu, Chun-Shan Dong\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JPR.S517578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block (S-FICB) provides incomplete analgesia for total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to anatomical limitations. This study compares two modified approaches-PENG block with wound infiltration (WI) and a modified S-FICB-to identify the optimal analgesic technique for THA.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Eighty-six subjects were randomly allocated to either the PENG block + WI group or the modified S-FICB group. The primary outcome was the postoperative numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores (rest/hip adduction) at 6 hours. The secondary outcomes were pain scores at 12, 24, 48 hours postoperatively and postoperative day 5, the incidence of postoperative quadriceps motor block at 6, 12, 24, 48 hours and postoperative day 5, the mean blood pressure (MAP) at five time points, patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) usage and adverse effects such as the incidence of rescue analgesia, local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), postoperative hip infection, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) within 5 days after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PENG + WI group had lower NRS at rest (6h) (95% CI 0.51-1.64, p<0.001). Compared with the PENG block + WI, the modified S-FICB resulted in a higher incidence of quadriceps motor block at 6 hours (82.1% vs 25.6%; OR=13.257, 95% CI 4.46-39.38; p<0.001) and 12 hours (71.8% vs 41%; OR=3.659, 95% CI 1.42-9.42; p=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PENG block + WI provides sufficient postoperative analgesia with no quadriceps motor block compared to modified S-FICB, supporting early ambulation and in line with the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"2679-2688\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12120252/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S517578\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S517578","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:由于解剖结构的限制,囊周神经群(PENG)阻滞和腹股沟上筋膜髂阻滞(S-FICB)为全髋关节置换术(THA)提供不完全镇痛。本研究比较了两种改进的方法——伤口浸润的peng阻滞(WI)和改进的s- ficb,以确定THA的最佳镇痛技术。患者和方法:86例受试者随机分为PENG阻滞+ WI组和改良S-FICB组。主要终点是术后6小时的数值评定量表(NRS)疼痛评分(休息/髋关节内收)。次要结果为术后12、24、48小时及术后第5天疼痛评分,术后6、12、24、48小时及术后第5天股四头肌运动阻滞发生率,5个时间点平均血压(MAP),患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)使用情况及不良反应发生率,如抢救镇痛发生率、局麻全身毒性(LAST)、术后髋关节感染、术后5天内恶心呕吐(PONV)发生率。结果:与改良S-FICB相比,PENG + WI组在休息(6h)时的NRS较低(95% CI 0.51-1.64)。结论:与改良S-FICB相比,PENG阻滞+ WI提供了足够的术后镇痛,没有股四头肌运动阻滞,支持早期活动,符合术后增强恢复(ERAS)方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block with Wound Infiltration vs Modified Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca Block on Postoperative Analgesia in Adult Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty - A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Purpose: Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block (S-FICB) provides incomplete analgesia for total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to anatomical limitations. This study compares two modified approaches-PENG block with wound infiltration (WI) and a modified S-FICB-to identify the optimal analgesic technique for THA.

Patients and methods: Eighty-six subjects were randomly allocated to either the PENG block + WI group or the modified S-FICB group. The primary outcome was the postoperative numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores (rest/hip adduction) at 6 hours. The secondary outcomes were pain scores at 12, 24, 48 hours postoperatively and postoperative day 5, the incidence of postoperative quadriceps motor block at 6, 12, 24, 48 hours and postoperative day 5, the mean blood pressure (MAP) at five time points, patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) usage and adverse effects such as the incidence of rescue analgesia, local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), postoperative hip infection, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) within 5 days after surgery.

Results: PENG + WI group had lower NRS at rest (6h) (95% CI 0.51-1.64, p<0.001). Compared with the PENG block + WI, the modified S-FICB resulted in a higher incidence of quadriceps motor block at 6 hours (82.1% vs 25.6%; OR=13.257, 95% CI 4.46-39.38; p<0.001) and 12 hours (71.8% vs 41%; OR=3.659, 95% CI 1.42-9.42; p=0.001).

Conclusion: PENG block + WI provides sufficient postoperative analgesia with no quadriceps motor block compared to modified S-FICB, supporting early ambulation and in line with the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信