人工智能与公共卫生:前景、炒作和挑战。

IF 2.5 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Don Nutbeam, Andrew J Milat
{"title":"人工智能与公共卫生:前景、炒作和挑战。","authors":"Don Nutbeam, Andrew J Milat","doi":"10.1071/PU24001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives and importance of the study Applications of artificial intelligence (AI) platforms and technologies to healthcare have been widely promoted as offering revolutionary improvements and efficiencies in clinical practice and health services organisation. Practical applications of AI in public health are now emerging and receiving similar attention. This paper provides an overview of the issues and examples of research that help separate the potential from the hype. Methods Selective review and analysis of cross-section of relevant literature. Results Great potential exists for the use of AI in public health practice and research. This includes immediate applications in improving health education and communication directly with the public, as well as great potential for the productive use of generative AI through chatbots and virtual assistants in health communication. AI also has applications in disease surveillance and public health science, for example in improving epidemic and pandemic early warning systems, in synthetic data generation, in sequential decision-making in uncertain conditions (reinforcement learning) and in disease risk prediction. Most published research examining these and other applications is at a fairly early stage, making it difficult to separate the probable benefits from the hype. This research is undoubtedly demonstrating great potential but also identifying challenges, for example in the quality and relevance of health information being produced by generative AI; in access, trust and use of the technology by different populations; and in the practical application of AI to support disease surveillance and public health science. There are real risks that current access and patterns of use may exacerbate existing inequities in health and that the orientation towards the personalisation of health advice may divert attention away from underlying social and economic determinants of health. Conclusions Realising the potential of AI not only requires further research and experimentation but also careful consideration of its ethical implications and thoughtful regulation. This will ensure that advances in these technologies serve the best interests of individuals and communities worldwide and don't exacerbate existing health inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":45898,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Research & Practice","volume":"35 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence and public health: prospects, hype and challenges.\",\"authors\":\"Don Nutbeam, Andrew J Milat\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/PU24001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objectives and importance of the study Applications of artificial intelligence (AI) platforms and technologies to healthcare have been widely promoted as offering revolutionary improvements and efficiencies in clinical practice and health services organisation. Practical applications of AI in public health are now emerging and receiving similar attention. This paper provides an overview of the issues and examples of research that help separate the potential from the hype. Methods Selective review and analysis of cross-section of relevant literature. Results Great potential exists for the use of AI in public health practice and research. This includes immediate applications in improving health education and communication directly with the public, as well as great potential for the productive use of generative AI through chatbots and virtual assistants in health communication. AI also has applications in disease surveillance and public health science, for example in improving epidemic and pandemic early warning systems, in synthetic data generation, in sequential decision-making in uncertain conditions (reinforcement learning) and in disease risk prediction. Most published research examining these and other applications is at a fairly early stage, making it difficult to separate the probable benefits from the hype. This research is undoubtedly demonstrating great potential but also identifying challenges, for example in the quality and relevance of health information being produced by generative AI; in access, trust and use of the technology by different populations; and in the practical application of AI to support disease surveillance and public health science. There are real risks that current access and patterns of use may exacerbate existing inequities in health and that the orientation towards the personalisation of health advice may divert attention away from underlying social and economic determinants of health. Conclusions Realising the potential of AI not only requires further research and experimentation but also careful consideration of its ethical implications and thoughtful regulation. This will ensure that advances in these technologies serve the best interests of individuals and communities worldwide and don't exacerbate existing health inequalities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health Research & Practice\",\"volume\":\"35 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health Research & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/PU24001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PU24001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)平台和技术在医疗保健领域的应用已被广泛推广,为临床实践和卫生服务组织提供了革命性的改进和效率。人工智能在公共卫生方面的实际应用正在出现,并受到类似的关注。本文提供了一个问题的概述和研究的例子,帮助从炒作中分离潜力。方法对相关文献进行选择性回顾和横断面分析。结果人工智能在公共卫生实践和研究中具有很大的应用潜力。这包括在改善健康教育和直接与公众沟通方面的即时应用,以及通过聊天机器人和虚拟助手在健康沟通中有效使用生成人工智能的巨大潜力。人工智能在疾病监测和公共卫生科学方面也有应用,例如在改进流行病和大流行早期预警系统、合成数据生成、不确定条件下的顺序决策(强化学习)和疾病风险预测方面。大多数已发表的关于这些和其他应用的研究都处于相当早期的阶段,因此很难将可能的好处与炒作区分开来。这项研究无疑显示了巨大的潜力,但也发现了挑战,例如生成式人工智能产生的卫生信息的质量和相关性;不同人群对技术的获取、信任和使用;以及人工智能在支持疾病监测和公共卫生科学方面的实际应用。实际的风险是,目前的获取和使用方式可能会加剧健康方面现有的不公平现象,而且注重个性化的健康咨询可能会转移人们对健康的基本社会和经济决定因素的注意力。实现人工智能的潜力不仅需要进一步的研究和实验,还需要仔细考虑其伦理影响和周到的监管。这将确保这些技术的进步为全世界个人和社区的最大利益服务,并且不会加剧现有的卫生不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial intelligence and public health: prospects, hype and challenges.

Objectives and importance of the study Applications of artificial intelligence (AI) platforms and technologies to healthcare have been widely promoted as offering revolutionary improvements and efficiencies in clinical practice and health services organisation. Practical applications of AI in public health are now emerging and receiving similar attention. This paper provides an overview of the issues and examples of research that help separate the potential from the hype. Methods Selective review and analysis of cross-section of relevant literature. Results Great potential exists for the use of AI in public health practice and research. This includes immediate applications in improving health education and communication directly with the public, as well as great potential for the productive use of generative AI through chatbots and virtual assistants in health communication. AI also has applications in disease surveillance and public health science, for example in improving epidemic and pandemic early warning systems, in synthetic data generation, in sequential decision-making in uncertain conditions (reinforcement learning) and in disease risk prediction. Most published research examining these and other applications is at a fairly early stage, making it difficult to separate the probable benefits from the hype. This research is undoubtedly demonstrating great potential but also identifying challenges, for example in the quality and relevance of health information being produced by generative AI; in access, trust and use of the technology by different populations; and in the practical application of AI to support disease surveillance and public health science. There are real risks that current access and patterns of use may exacerbate existing inequities in health and that the orientation towards the personalisation of health advice may divert attention away from underlying social and economic determinants of health. Conclusions Realising the potential of AI not only requires further research and experimentation but also careful consideration of its ethical implications and thoughtful regulation. This will ensure that advances in these technologies serve the best interests of individuals and communities worldwide and don't exacerbate existing health inequalities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Research & Practice
Public Health Research & Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Public Health Research & Practice is an open-access, quarterly, online journal with a strong focus on the connection between research, policy and practice. It publishes innovative, high-quality papers that inform public health policy and practice, paying particular attention to innovations, data and perspectives from policy and practice. The journal is published by the Sax Institute, a national leader in promoting the use of research evidence in health policy. Formerly known as The NSW Public Health Bulletin, the journal has a long history. It was published by the NSW Ministry of Health for nearly a quarter of a century. Responsibility for its publication transferred to the Sax Institute in 2014, and the journal receives guidance from an expert editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信