地球健康:越来越受到欢迎,但尚未完全实现。

IF 2.5 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Angie Bone, Francis Nona, Selina Namchee Lo, Anthony Capon
{"title":"地球健康:越来越受到欢迎,但尚未完全实现。","authors":"Angie Bone, Francis Nona, Selina Namchee Lo, Anthony Capon","doi":"10.1071/PU24002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The modern field of 'planetary health' was instigated in 2015 by the Rockefeller Foundation-Lancet Commission, which defined it as 'the health of human civilisation and the state of the natural systems on which it depends'. However, this view of human health in relation to natural systems is not really new at all. Rather, it is (re)emerging as the environmental impacts of human activities and their effects on the health of all life on Earth, now and in the future, become increasingly clear. A planetary health approach requires us to rethink dominant perspectives about how we feed, move, house, power and care for the world, as well as the implications for wellbeing and equity across generations and locations. This shift in understanding of our place as humans in relation to the planet is fundamental to addressing the polycrises of the 21st century. Planetary health approaches are increasingly embraced but not yet fully realised or embedded. More organisations and collaborations, in the health sector and beyond, are incorporating these ideas into their methods, plans and training, including concepts that are part of, but not synonymous with planetary health, such as one health, global health, environmental health, climate health and sustainable healthcare. Yet, we are still far from the collective cultural transformation needed to achieve the promise of planetary health as a movement that puts the health of people and the planet at the centre of all policy and action. Education and training in the Western tradition encourage 'human-centred' or 'colonial' thinking. There is much to (re)learn from First Nations peoples, and other non-Western worldviews, about the interdependence of all species and what that means for sustainable health and wellbeing. We offer proposals for how public health policymakers, researchers and practitioners, might support the transformation needed and address the conceptual, knowledge and governance challenges identified by the Rockefeller Foundation-Lancet Commission.</p>","PeriodicalId":45898,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Research & Practice","volume":"35 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Planetary health: increasingly embraced but not yet fully realised.\",\"authors\":\"Angie Bone, Francis Nona, Selina Namchee Lo, Anthony Capon\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/PU24002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The modern field of 'planetary health' was instigated in 2015 by the Rockefeller Foundation-Lancet Commission, which defined it as 'the health of human civilisation and the state of the natural systems on which it depends'. However, this view of human health in relation to natural systems is not really new at all. Rather, it is (re)emerging as the environmental impacts of human activities and their effects on the health of all life on Earth, now and in the future, become increasingly clear. A planetary health approach requires us to rethink dominant perspectives about how we feed, move, house, power and care for the world, as well as the implications for wellbeing and equity across generations and locations. This shift in understanding of our place as humans in relation to the planet is fundamental to addressing the polycrises of the 21st century. Planetary health approaches are increasingly embraced but not yet fully realised or embedded. More organisations and collaborations, in the health sector and beyond, are incorporating these ideas into their methods, plans and training, including concepts that are part of, but not synonymous with planetary health, such as one health, global health, environmental health, climate health and sustainable healthcare. Yet, we are still far from the collective cultural transformation needed to achieve the promise of planetary health as a movement that puts the health of people and the planet at the centre of all policy and action. Education and training in the Western tradition encourage 'human-centred' or 'colonial' thinking. There is much to (re)learn from First Nations peoples, and other non-Western worldviews, about the interdependence of all species and what that means for sustainable health and wellbeing. We offer proposals for how public health policymakers, researchers and practitioners, might support the transformation needed and address the conceptual, knowledge and governance challenges identified by the Rockefeller Foundation-Lancet Commission.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health Research & Practice\",\"volume\":\"35 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health Research & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/PU24002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PU24002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“地球健康”这一现代领域是由洛克菲勒基金会-柳叶刀委员会于2015年发起的,该委员会将其定义为“人类文明的健康及其所依赖的自然系统的状态”。然而,这种关于人类健康与自然系统之间关系的观点其实一点也不新鲜。相反,随着人类活动对环境的影响及其对现在和未来地球上所有生命健康的影响日益明显,它正在(重新)出现。地球健康方法要求我们重新思考关于我们如何喂养、移动、居住、供电和照顾世界的主流观点,以及对代际和地区的福祉和公平的影响。这种对人类与地球关系的理解的转变,对于解决21世纪的多重危机至关重要。越来越多的人接受了行星健康方法,但尚未充分实现或纳入其中。在卫生部门内外,越来越多的组织和合作正在将这些想法纳入其方法、计划和培训中,包括属于但不等同于地球健康的概念,如单一健康、全球健康、环境健康、气候健康和可持续卫生保健。然而,我们仍远未实现实现地球健康承诺所需的集体文化转型,这是一项将人类和地球健康置于所有政策和行动中心的运动。西方传统的教育和培训鼓励“以人为本”或“殖民主义”思维。关于所有物种的相互依存以及这对可持续的健康和福祉意味着什么,有很多东西需要从第一民族和其他非西方世界观中(重新)学习。我们就公共卫生政策制定者、研究人员和从业人员如何支持所需的转型,并应对洛克菲勒基金会-柳叶刀委员会确定的概念、知识和治理挑战提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Planetary health: increasingly embraced but not yet fully realised.

The modern field of 'planetary health' was instigated in 2015 by the Rockefeller Foundation-Lancet Commission, which defined it as 'the health of human civilisation and the state of the natural systems on which it depends'. However, this view of human health in relation to natural systems is not really new at all. Rather, it is (re)emerging as the environmental impacts of human activities and their effects on the health of all life on Earth, now and in the future, become increasingly clear. A planetary health approach requires us to rethink dominant perspectives about how we feed, move, house, power and care for the world, as well as the implications for wellbeing and equity across generations and locations. This shift in understanding of our place as humans in relation to the planet is fundamental to addressing the polycrises of the 21st century. Planetary health approaches are increasingly embraced but not yet fully realised or embedded. More organisations and collaborations, in the health sector and beyond, are incorporating these ideas into their methods, plans and training, including concepts that are part of, but not synonymous with planetary health, such as one health, global health, environmental health, climate health and sustainable healthcare. Yet, we are still far from the collective cultural transformation needed to achieve the promise of planetary health as a movement that puts the health of people and the planet at the centre of all policy and action. Education and training in the Western tradition encourage 'human-centred' or 'colonial' thinking. There is much to (re)learn from First Nations peoples, and other non-Western worldviews, about the interdependence of all species and what that means for sustainable health and wellbeing. We offer proposals for how public health policymakers, researchers and practitioners, might support the transformation needed and address the conceptual, knowledge and governance challenges identified by the Rockefeller Foundation-Lancet Commission.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Research & Practice
Public Health Research & Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Public Health Research & Practice is an open-access, quarterly, online journal with a strong focus on the connection between research, policy and practice. It publishes innovative, high-quality papers that inform public health policy and practice, paying particular attention to innovations, data and perspectives from policy and practice. The journal is published by the Sax Institute, a national leader in promoting the use of research evidence in health policy. Formerly known as The NSW Public Health Bulletin, the journal has a long history. It was published by the NSW Ministry of Health for nearly a quarter of a century. Responsibility for its publication transferred to the Sax Institute in 2014, and the journal receives guidance from an expert editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信