陆军作战体能测试计分结构与预备役军官训练团学员体能实验室测量的关系

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Ward C Dobbs, Thomas G Almonroeder, Makenna Carpenter, Rachel E Schmitt, Anna K Jacobson, Joel A Luedke, Brandon M Roberts, Andrew R Jagim
{"title":"陆军作战体能测试计分结构与预备役军官训练团学员体能实验室测量的关系","authors":"Ward C Dobbs, Thomas G Almonroeder, Makenna Carpenter, Rachel E Schmitt, Anna K Jacobson, Joel A Luedke, Brandon M Roberts, Andrew R Jagim","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Dobbs, WC, Almonroeder, TG, Carpenter, M, Schmitt, RE, Jacobson, AK, Luedke, JA, Roberts, BM, and Jagim, AR. Relationships between the Army Combat Fitness Test scoring structure and laboratory measurements of physical fitness in reserve officer training corps cadets. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-The Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) assesses aerobic and anaerobic fitness capabilities in the U.S. Army. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between raw and composite ACFT scores and laboratory-based measurements of fitness. Nineteen Reserve Officers' Training Corp cadets performed a battery of laboratory-based fitness testing. Tests included a movement screening (Fusionetics), countermovement jumps, and maximal isometric mid-thigh pulls on portable force plates to determine power and strength. A Wingate test involving maximal cycling for 30 seconds was used to determine peak and mean power. On a separate day, cadets completed body composition and a graded exercise test on a motorized treadmill to determine peak oxygen uptake (V̇o2peak). Pearson correlations and partial corrections with 2000 bootstraps were used to compare ACFT scores (raw, composite, gender-neutral composite, and z-scores) with laboratory results. Significant associations were identified as 95% confidence intervals, not including zero. The results indicated that V̇o2peak (r = 0.61, [0.08-0.84]), body fat percentage (r = -0.4, [-0.72 to -0.06]), and relative peak power (r = 0.38, [0.02-0.68]) were associated with the total ACFT composite score when partialled by sex. All laboratory tests, except the movement screening, showed meaningful associations with total ACFT z-scores and gender-neutral ACFT scores (r > 0.54). However, most relationships were eliminated when partialled out by sex, which may be due to a low sample size of women. This suggests the current scoring structure utilized for men is representative of aerobic and anaerobic fitness parameters and may be able to discriminate performance levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationships Between the Army Combat Fitness Test Scoring Structure and Laboratory Measurements of Physical Fitness in Reserve Officer Training Corps Cadets.\",\"authors\":\"Ward C Dobbs, Thomas G Almonroeder, Makenna Carpenter, Rachel E Schmitt, Anna K Jacobson, Joel A Luedke, Brandon M Roberts, Andrew R Jagim\",\"doi\":\"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Dobbs, WC, Almonroeder, TG, Carpenter, M, Schmitt, RE, Jacobson, AK, Luedke, JA, Roberts, BM, and Jagim, AR. Relationships between the Army Combat Fitness Test scoring structure and laboratory measurements of physical fitness in reserve officer training corps cadets. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-The Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) assesses aerobic and anaerobic fitness capabilities in the U.S. Army. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between raw and composite ACFT scores and laboratory-based measurements of fitness. Nineteen Reserve Officers' Training Corp cadets performed a battery of laboratory-based fitness testing. Tests included a movement screening (Fusionetics), countermovement jumps, and maximal isometric mid-thigh pulls on portable force plates to determine power and strength. A Wingate test involving maximal cycling for 30 seconds was used to determine peak and mean power. On a separate day, cadets completed body composition and a graded exercise test on a motorized treadmill to determine peak oxygen uptake (V̇o2peak). Pearson correlations and partial corrections with 2000 bootstraps were used to compare ACFT scores (raw, composite, gender-neutral composite, and z-scores) with laboratory results. Significant associations were identified as 95% confidence intervals, not including zero. The results indicated that V̇o2peak (r = 0.61, [0.08-0.84]), body fat percentage (r = -0.4, [-0.72 to -0.06]), and relative peak power (r = 0.38, [0.02-0.68]) were associated with the total ACFT composite score when partialled by sex. All laboratory tests, except the movement screening, showed meaningful associations with total ACFT z-scores and gender-neutral ACFT scores (r > 0.54). However, most relationships were eliminated when partialled out by sex, which may be due to a low sample size of women. This suggests the current scoring structure utilized for men is representative of aerobic and anaerobic fitness parameters and may be able to discriminate performance levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005117\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005117","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

[摘要]Dobbs, WC, Almonroeder, TG, Carpenter, M, Schmitt, RE, Jacobson, AK, Luedke, JA, Roberts, BM, Jagim, AR.陆军作战体能测试评分结构与预备役军官训练团学员体能实验室测量的关系。陆军作战体能测试(ACFT)评估美国陆军的有氧和无氧体能能力。本研究的目的是评估原始和复合ACFT评分与基于实验室的健身测量之间的关联。19名预备役军官训练团学员在实验室进行了一系列体能测试。测试包括运动筛选(融合),反运动跳跃,以及在便携式力板上最大等距大腿中部拉力,以确定力量和力量。温盖特测试包括最大循环30秒来确定峰值和平均功率。在另外一天,学员们在电动跑步机上完成了身体组成和分级运动测试,以确定峰值摄氧量(vo2峰值)。使用Pearson相关性和2000个bootstrap的部分修正来比较ACFT分数(原始,合成,性别中立合成和z分数)与实验室结果。显著关联以95%置信区间确定,不包括零。结果表明,按性别分割时,V / o2峰值(r = 0.61,[0.08 ~ 0.84])、体脂率(r = -0.4,[-0.72 ~ -0.06])和相对峰值功率(r = 0.38,[0.02 ~ 0.68])与ACFT综合总分相关。除运动筛查外,所有实验室测试均显示与ACFT总z分数和性别中立ACFT分数有意义的关联(r > 0.54)。然而,当按性别划分时,大多数关系都被排除了,这可能是由于女性的样本量小。这表明,目前用于男性的评分结构是有氧和无氧健身参数的代表,可能能够区分表现水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relationships Between the Army Combat Fitness Test Scoring Structure and Laboratory Measurements of Physical Fitness in Reserve Officer Training Corps Cadets.

Abstract: Dobbs, WC, Almonroeder, TG, Carpenter, M, Schmitt, RE, Jacobson, AK, Luedke, JA, Roberts, BM, and Jagim, AR. Relationships between the Army Combat Fitness Test scoring structure and laboratory measurements of physical fitness in reserve officer training corps cadets. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-The Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) assesses aerobic and anaerobic fitness capabilities in the U.S. Army. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between raw and composite ACFT scores and laboratory-based measurements of fitness. Nineteen Reserve Officers' Training Corp cadets performed a battery of laboratory-based fitness testing. Tests included a movement screening (Fusionetics), countermovement jumps, and maximal isometric mid-thigh pulls on portable force plates to determine power and strength. A Wingate test involving maximal cycling for 30 seconds was used to determine peak and mean power. On a separate day, cadets completed body composition and a graded exercise test on a motorized treadmill to determine peak oxygen uptake (V̇o2peak). Pearson correlations and partial corrections with 2000 bootstraps were used to compare ACFT scores (raw, composite, gender-neutral composite, and z-scores) with laboratory results. Significant associations were identified as 95% confidence intervals, not including zero. The results indicated that V̇o2peak (r = 0.61, [0.08-0.84]), body fat percentage (r = -0.4, [-0.72 to -0.06]), and relative peak power (r = 0.38, [0.02-0.68]) were associated with the total ACFT composite score when partialled by sex. All laboratory tests, except the movement screening, showed meaningful associations with total ACFT z-scores and gender-neutral ACFT scores (r > 0.54). However, most relationships were eliminated when partialled out by sex, which may be due to a low sample size of women. This suggests the current scoring structure utilized for men is representative of aerobic and anaerobic fitness parameters and may be able to discriminate performance levels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信