在野外消防服中饮用能量饮料和咖啡因当量饮料后的疲劳热应变。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Nathan E Bartman, Jennifer L Temple, Hayden W Hess, Deanna Colburn, David Hostler
{"title":"在野外消防服中饮用能量饮料和咖啡因当量饮料后的疲劳热应变。","authors":"Nathan E Bartman, Jennifer L Temple, Hayden W Hess, Deanna Colburn, David Hostler","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Bartman, NE, Temple, JL, Hess, HW, Colburn, D, and Hostler, D. Exertional heat strain after an energy drink and caffeine-equivalent beverage in wildland firefighting garments. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-Caffeine is widely consumed for its stimulant properties and potential ergogenic benefits. Wildland firefighters consume caffeine, but caffeinated energy drinks (ED) are discouraged. The purpose of this investigation was to assess physiologic and perceptual strain walking in wildland firefighting garments after consuming an ED or another equally caffeinated beverage (CAF). Twelve subjects {age (mean [95% confidence interval]): 27 (23-32) years, height: 173 (169-177) cm, mass: 76 (70-83) kg, V̇o2max: 43 (36-50) ml·kg-1·min-1} walked on a treadmill 90 min at 40-50% V̇o2max in 30° C, 80% RH conditions after consuming ED or CAF (200 mg caffeine). Significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Peak core temperature (CAF: 39.1° C [38.9-39.3° C]; ED: 39.1° C [38.8-39.4° C], p = 0.94), physiologic strain index (CAF: 8.5 [7.9-9.2] score; ED: 8.5 [7.7-9.4] score, p = 0.87), and perceptual strain index (CAF: 7.9 [6.7-9.0] score; ED: 8.0 [6.8-9.1] score, p = 0.75) were not different between conditions. There were no differences in sweat rate (CAF: 18 [10-26] mL·min-1; ED: 19 [14-24] mL·min-1, p = 0.66), peak heart rate (CAF: 175 [167-184] b·min-1; ED: 177 [168-186] b·min-1, p = 0.86), perceived exertion (CAF: 8 [6-9] rating; ED: 8 [7-8] rating, p = 0.68), and fatigue (CAF: 7 [6-9] rating; ED: 7 [5-8] rating, p = 0.07). Consuming ED did not worsen physiologic or perceptual strain compared with consuming caffeine alone. For regular caffeine users, an ED may be an acceptable alternative caffeine source for wildland firefighters hiking in hot conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exertional Heat Strain After an Energy Drink and Caffeine-Equivalent Beverage in Wildland Firefighting Garments.\",\"authors\":\"Nathan E Bartman, Jennifer L Temple, Hayden W Hess, Deanna Colburn, David Hostler\",\"doi\":\"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Bartman, NE, Temple, JL, Hess, HW, Colburn, D, and Hostler, D. Exertional heat strain after an energy drink and caffeine-equivalent beverage in wildland firefighting garments. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-Caffeine is widely consumed for its stimulant properties and potential ergogenic benefits. Wildland firefighters consume caffeine, but caffeinated energy drinks (ED) are discouraged. The purpose of this investigation was to assess physiologic and perceptual strain walking in wildland firefighting garments after consuming an ED or another equally caffeinated beverage (CAF). Twelve subjects {age (mean [95% confidence interval]): 27 (23-32) years, height: 173 (169-177) cm, mass: 76 (70-83) kg, V̇o2max: 43 (36-50) ml·kg-1·min-1} walked on a treadmill 90 min at 40-50% V̇o2max in 30° C, 80% RH conditions after consuming ED or CAF (200 mg caffeine). Significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Peak core temperature (CAF: 39.1° C [38.9-39.3° C]; ED: 39.1° C [38.8-39.4° C], p = 0.94), physiologic strain index (CAF: 8.5 [7.9-9.2] score; ED: 8.5 [7.7-9.4] score, p = 0.87), and perceptual strain index (CAF: 7.9 [6.7-9.0] score; ED: 8.0 [6.8-9.1] score, p = 0.75) were not different between conditions. There were no differences in sweat rate (CAF: 18 [10-26] mL·min-1; ED: 19 [14-24] mL·min-1, p = 0.66), peak heart rate (CAF: 175 [167-184] b·min-1; ED: 177 [168-186] b·min-1, p = 0.86), perceived exertion (CAF: 8 [6-9] rating; ED: 8 [7-8] rating, p = 0.68), and fatigue (CAF: 7 [6-9] rating; ED: 7 [5-8] rating, p = 0.07). Consuming ED did not worsen physiologic or perceptual strain compared with consuming caffeine alone. For regular caffeine users, an ED may be an acceptable alternative caffeine source for wildland firefighters hiking in hot conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005138\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005138","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:Bartman, NE, Temple, JL, Hess, HW, Colburn, D, and Hostler, D.在野外消防服中饮用能量饮料和咖啡因当量饮料后的用力热应变。咖啡因因其刺激特性和潜在的人体健康益处而被广泛使用。野外消防员会摄入咖啡因,但不鼓励饮用含咖啡因的能量饮料。本研究的目的是评估在饮用ED或另一种同样含咖啡因的饮料(CAF)后,穿着野外消防服行走的生理和知觉压力。12名受试者{年龄(平均值[95%可信区间]):27(23-32)岁,身高:173 (169-177)cm,体重:76 (70-83)kg, vo2max: 43 (36-50) ml·kg-1·min-1},在30°C, 80% RH条件下,消耗ED或CAF (200 mg咖啡因)后,以40-50%的vo2max在跑步机上行走90分钟。p≤0.05为显著性。峰值核心温度(CAF: 39.1°C[38.9-39.3°C];ED: 39.1°C[38.8 ~ 39.4°C], p = 0.94),生理应变指数(CAF: 8.5[7.9 ~ 9.2]分;ED: 8.5[7.7-9.4]分,p = 0.87),感知应变指数(CAF: 7.9[6.7-9.0]分;ED: 8.0[6.8 ~ 9.1]分,p = 0.75)。排汗率无差异(CAF: 18 [10-26] mL·min-1;ED: 19 [14-24] mL·min-1, p = 0.66),峰值心率(CAF: 175 [167-184] b·min-1;ED: 177 [168-186] b·min-1, p = 0.86),感觉劳累(CAF: 8[6-9]评分;ED: 8[7-8]评分,p = 0.68),疲劳(CAF: 7[6-9]评分;ED: 7[5-8]评级,p = 0.07)。与单独摄入咖啡因相比,摄入ED不会加重生理或知觉压力。对于经常使用咖啡因的人来说,ED可能是在炎热条件下徒步旅行的野外消防员可以接受的替代咖啡因来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exertional Heat Strain After an Energy Drink and Caffeine-Equivalent Beverage in Wildland Firefighting Garments.

Abstract: Bartman, NE, Temple, JL, Hess, HW, Colburn, D, and Hostler, D. Exertional heat strain after an energy drink and caffeine-equivalent beverage in wildland firefighting garments. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-Caffeine is widely consumed for its stimulant properties and potential ergogenic benefits. Wildland firefighters consume caffeine, but caffeinated energy drinks (ED) are discouraged. The purpose of this investigation was to assess physiologic and perceptual strain walking in wildland firefighting garments after consuming an ED or another equally caffeinated beverage (CAF). Twelve subjects {age (mean [95% confidence interval]): 27 (23-32) years, height: 173 (169-177) cm, mass: 76 (70-83) kg, V̇o2max: 43 (36-50) ml·kg-1·min-1} walked on a treadmill 90 min at 40-50% V̇o2max in 30° C, 80% RH conditions after consuming ED or CAF (200 mg caffeine). Significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Peak core temperature (CAF: 39.1° C [38.9-39.3° C]; ED: 39.1° C [38.8-39.4° C], p = 0.94), physiologic strain index (CAF: 8.5 [7.9-9.2] score; ED: 8.5 [7.7-9.4] score, p = 0.87), and perceptual strain index (CAF: 7.9 [6.7-9.0] score; ED: 8.0 [6.8-9.1] score, p = 0.75) were not different between conditions. There were no differences in sweat rate (CAF: 18 [10-26] mL·min-1; ED: 19 [14-24] mL·min-1, p = 0.66), peak heart rate (CAF: 175 [167-184] b·min-1; ED: 177 [168-186] b·min-1, p = 0.86), perceived exertion (CAF: 8 [6-9] rating; ED: 8 [7-8] rating, p = 0.68), and fatigue (CAF: 7 [6-9] rating; ED: 7 [5-8] rating, p = 0.07). Consuming ED did not worsen physiologic or perceptual strain compared with consuming caffeine alone. For regular caffeine users, an ED may be an acceptable alternative caffeine source for wildland firefighters hiking in hot conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信