Fucile口腔运动刺激方案对早产儿喂养表现的影响:系统回顾和meta分析。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Golnoosh Golmohammadi, Mozhgan Asadi, Kowsar Baghban, Farhad Sakhai, Faezeh Asadollahpour
{"title":"Fucile口腔运动刺激方案对早产儿喂养表现的影响:系统回顾和meta分析。","authors":"Golnoosh Golmohammadi, Mozhgan Asadi, Kowsar Baghban, Farhad Sakhai, Faezeh Asadollahpour","doi":"10.1089/bfm.2025.0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Full oral feeding (FOF) is a critical milestone in preterm infants, often delayed because of immature feeding coordination. The Fucile oral motor stimulation protocol aims to address these challenges and enhance feeding progression. To evaluate the effectiveness of the Fucile oral motor stimulation protocol in reducing the transition time to FOF, shortening hospital stays, and improving feeding-related outcomes in preterm infants. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42022369514). Databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and CINAHL (1990-2024), were searched. Randomized controlled trials comparing the Fucile protocol with control interventions in preterm infants (<37 weeks of gestation) were included. Outcomes included transition time to FOF, hospital stay length, weight at discharge, and milk transfer rate. Risk of bias (RoB 2) and evidence certainty (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) were evaluated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Nineteen trials (1,031 infants) showed that the Fucile protocol significantly reduced transition time to FOF (mean difference [MD]: -5.77 days; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -6.64 to -4.90) and hospital stay duration (MD: -6.47 days; 95% CI: -8.41 to -4.53) with moderate-certainty evidence. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The Fucile protocol accelerates feeding milestones and reduces hospital stays for preterm infants, providing moderate-certainty evidence to support its clinical use. However, methodological limitations, including small sample sizes and risk of bias, underline the need for larger, high-quality trials to confirm these findings and refine clinical guidelines. These results suggest the potential of integrating oral motor stimulation into neonatal intensive care unit practices to enhance feeding outcomes and optimize care for preterm infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":9142,"journal":{"name":"Breastfeeding Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Fucile Oral Motor Stimulation Protocol on Feeding Performance in Preterm Infants: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Golnoosh Golmohammadi, Mozhgan Asadi, Kowsar Baghban, Farhad Sakhai, Faezeh Asadollahpour\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/bfm.2025.0031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Full oral feeding (FOF) is a critical milestone in preterm infants, often delayed because of immature feeding coordination. The Fucile oral motor stimulation protocol aims to address these challenges and enhance feeding progression. To evaluate the effectiveness of the Fucile oral motor stimulation protocol in reducing the transition time to FOF, shortening hospital stays, and improving feeding-related outcomes in preterm infants. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42022369514). Databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and CINAHL (1990-2024), were searched. Randomized controlled trials comparing the Fucile protocol with control interventions in preterm infants (<37 weeks of gestation) were included. Outcomes included transition time to FOF, hospital stay length, weight at discharge, and milk transfer rate. Risk of bias (RoB 2) and evidence certainty (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) were evaluated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Nineteen trials (1,031 infants) showed that the Fucile protocol significantly reduced transition time to FOF (mean difference [MD]: -5.77 days; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -6.64 to -4.90) and hospital stay duration (MD: -6.47 days; 95% CI: -8.41 to -4.53) with moderate-certainty evidence. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The Fucile protocol accelerates feeding milestones and reduces hospital stays for preterm infants, providing moderate-certainty evidence to support its clinical use. However, methodological limitations, including small sample sizes and risk of bias, underline the need for larger, high-quality trials to confirm these findings and refine clinical guidelines. These results suggest the potential of integrating oral motor stimulation into neonatal intensive care unit practices to enhance feeding outcomes and optimize care for preterm infants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breastfeeding Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breastfeeding Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2025.0031\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breastfeeding Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2025.0031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:完全口服喂养(FOF)是早产儿的一个重要里程碑,通常由于喂养协调不成熟而延迟。Fucile口腔运动刺激方案旨在解决这些挑战并促进进食进展。评估fuile口腔运动刺激方案在减少早产儿向FOF过渡时间、缩短住院时间和改善喂养相关结局方面的有效性。方法:根据PRISMA指南(PROSPERO: CRD42022369514)进行系统评价和荟萃分析。检索数据库包括PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、CENTRAL和CINAHL(1990-2024)。比较Fucile方案与对照干预措施对早产儿的影响的随机对照试验(结果:19项试验(1031名婴儿)显示,Fucile方案显著缩短了向FOF过渡的时间(平均差[MD]: -5.77天;95%置信区间[CI]: -6.64至-4.90)和住院时间(MD: -6.47天;95% CI: -8.41至-4.53),证据具有中等确定性。结论:Fucile方案加速了早产儿的喂养里程碑并减少了住院时间,为支持其临床应用提供了中等确定性的证据。然而,方法学的局限性,包括小样本量和偏倚风险,强调需要更大规模、高质量的试验来证实这些发现并完善临床指南。这些结果表明,将口腔运动刺激纳入新生儿重症监护病房实践,以提高喂养结果和优化早产儿护理的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Fucile Oral Motor Stimulation Protocol on Feeding Performance in Preterm Infants: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Full oral feeding (FOF) is a critical milestone in preterm infants, often delayed because of immature feeding coordination. The Fucile oral motor stimulation protocol aims to address these challenges and enhance feeding progression. To evaluate the effectiveness of the Fucile oral motor stimulation protocol in reducing the transition time to FOF, shortening hospital stays, and improving feeding-related outcomes in preterm infants. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42022369514). Databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and CINAHL (1990-2024), were searched. Randomized controlled trials comparing the Fucile protocol with control interventions in preterm infants (<37 weeks of gestation) were included. Outcomes included transition time to FOF, hospital stay length, weight at discharge, and milk transfer rate. Risk of bias (RoB 2) and evidence certainty (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) were evaluated. Results: Nineteen trials (1,031 infants) showed that the Fucile protocol significantly reduced transition time to FOF (mean difference [MD]: -5.77 days; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -6.64 to -4.90) and hospital stay duration (MD: -6.47 days; 95% CI: -8.41 to -4.53) with moderate-certainty evidence. Conclusion: The Fucile protocol accelerates feeding milestones and reduces hospital stays for preterm infants, providing moderate-certainty evidence to support its clinical use. However, methodological limitations, including small sample sizes and risk of bias, underline the need for larger, high-quality trials to confirm these findings and refine clinical guidelines. These results suggest the potential of integrating oral motor stimulation into neonatal intensive care unit practices to enhance feeding outcomes and optimize care for preterm infants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Breastfeeding Medicine
Breastfeeding Medicine OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Breastfeeding Medicine provides unparalleled peer-reviewed research, protocols, and clinical applications to ensure optimal care for mother and infant. The Journal answers the growing demand for evidence-based research and explores the immediate and long-term outcomes of breastfeeding, including its epidemiologic, physiologic, and psychological benefits. It is the exclusive source of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine protocols. Breastfeeding Medicine coverage includes: Breastfeeding recommendations and protocols Health consequences of artificial feeding Physiology of lactation and biochemistry of breast milk Optimal nutrition for the breastfeeding mother Breastfeeding indications and contraindications Managing breastfeeding discomfort, pain, and other complications Breastfeeding the premature or sick infant Breastfeeding in the chronically ill mother Management of the breastfeeding mother on medication Infectious disease transmission through breast milk and breastfeeding The collection and storage of human milk and human milk banking Measuring the impact of being a “baby-friendly” hospital Cultural competence and cultural sensitivity International public health issues including social and economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信