念珠菌眼内炎和脉络膜视网膜炎的诊断和治疗。

IF 8.5 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Nitipong Permpalung, Sarah Sedik, Peter G Pappas, Martin Hoenigl, Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner
{"title":"念珠菌眼内炎和脉络膜视网膜炎的诊断和治疗。","authors":"Nitipong Permpalung, Sarah Sedik, Peter G Pappas, Martin Hoenigl, Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.05.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Candida endophthalmitis (CE) and chorioretinitis are uncommon but potentially devastating complications of candidemia, associated with significant risks of vision loss and long-term morbidity. Effective management relies on timely diagnosis and targeted antifungal therapy. However, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches are hindered by inconsistent guidelines, limited evidence, and variations in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review synthesizes current knowledge on CE and chorioretinitis to provide a comprehensive framework for clinicians. It addresses diagnostic challenges, including ophthalmoscopy, imaging, and microbiological diagnostics, and therapeutic strategies such as systemic and intravitreal antifungal therapies, surgical interventions, and serial ophthalmic evaluations.</p><p><strong>Sources: </strong>An extensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, with a focus on epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnostics, treatment, and outcomes. Guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America, European Confederation for Medical Mycology, and American Academy of Ophthalmology were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>The prevalence of CE among patients with candidemia has increased from 1.8% in the pre-echinocandin era to 2.1% after the introduction of echinocandins. Diagnosis relies primarily on indirect ophthalmoscopy, the reference standard for retinal visualization. In selected cases, optical coherence tomography or fundus photography may support lesion assessment. Microbiological confirmation via vitreous sampling remains definitive but is often limited by low organism burden. Emerging diagnostics-such as clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-based fungal DNA assays-have shown promise. Although artificial intelligence-assisted imaging tools are established in other retinal diseases, they have not yet been validated for Candida ocular infections. Fluconazole and voriconazole remain first-line systemic therapies, with intravitreal injections and vitrectomy reserved for severe cases.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Improving outcomes in CE requires harmonized screening protocols, timely access to ophthalmologic care, and multidisciplinary collaboration. Future research should aim to refine diagnostic algorithms, define optimal treatment durations, clarify the role of emerging diagnostics, and leverage telemedicine and imaging technologies to improve early detection and longitudinal monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnosis and management of Candida endophthalmitis and chorioretinitis.\",\"authors\":\"Nitipong Permpalung, Sarah Sedik, Peter G Pappas, Martin Hoenigl, Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.05.028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Candida endophthalmitis (CE) and chorioretinitis are uncommon but potentially devastating complications of candidemia, associated with significant risks of vision loss and long-term morbidity. Effective management relies on timely diagnosis and targeted antifungal therapy. However, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches are hindered by inconsistent guidelines, limited evidence, and variations in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review synthesizes current knowledge on CE and chorioretinitis to provide a comprehensive framework for clinicians. It addresses diagnostic challenges, including ophthalmoscopy, imaging, and microbiological diagnostics, and therapeutic strategies such as systemic and intravitreal antifungal therapies, surgical interventions, and serial ophthalmic evaluations.</p><p><strong>Sources: </strong>An extensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, with a focus on epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnostics, treatment, and outcomes. Guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America, European Confederation for Medical Mycology, and American Academy of Ophthalmology were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>The prevalence of CE among patients with candidemia has increased from 1.8% in the pre-echinocandin era to 2.1% after the introduction of echinocandins. Diagnosis relies primarily on indirect ophthalmoscopy, the reference standard for retinal visualization. In selected cases, optical coherence tomography or fundus photography may support lesion assessment. Microbiological confirmation via vitreous sampling remains definitive but is often limited by low organism burden. Emerging diagnostics-such as clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-based fungal DNA assays-have shown promise. Although artificial intelligence-assisted imaging tools are established in other retinal diseases, they have not yet been validated for Candida ocular infections. Fluconazole and voriconazole remain first-line systemic therapies, with intravitreal injections and vitrectomy reserved for severe cases.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Improving outcomes in CE requires harmonized screening protocols, timely access to ophthalmologic care, and multidisciplinary collaboration. Future research should aim to refine diagnostic algorithms, define optimal treatment durations, clarify the role of emerging diagnostics, and leverage telemedicine and imaging technologies to improve early detection and longitudinal monitoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.05.028\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.05.028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:念珠菌眼内炎和绒毛膜视网膜炎是念珠菌病的罕见并发症,但具有潜在的破坏性,与视力丧失和长期发病率的显著风险相关。有效的治疗依赖于及时诊断和靶向抗真菌治疗。然而,诊断和治疗方法受到不一致的指南、有限的证据和临床实践变化的阻碍。目的:本文综述了念珠菌眼内炎和脉络膜视网膜炎的最新知识,为临床医生提供一个全面的框架。它解决了诊断方面的挑战,包括眼科镜检查、成像和微生物诊断,以及治疗策略,如全身和玻璃体内抗真菌治疗、手术干预和一系列眼科评估。资料来源:使用PubMed、Embase和Scopus进行了广泛的文献检索,重点是流行病学、发病机制、诊断、治疗和结果。本文回顾了美国传染病学会(IDSA)、欧洲医学真菌学联合会(ECMM)和美国眼科学会(AAO)的指南。内容:珠孢菌病患者的CE患病率从棘白菌素应用前的1.2%上升到棘白菌素应用后的2.1%。诊断主要依靠间接眼科检查,这是视网膜可视化的金标准。在某些情况下,光学相干断层扫描或眼底摄影可以支持病变评估。通过玻璃体取样进行微生物学确认仍然是确定的,但往往受到微生物负荷低的限制。新兴的诊断技术——比如基于crispr的真菌DNA检测——已经显示出了希望。虽然人工智能辅助成像工具在其他视网膜疾病中已经得到了很好的应用,但它们尚未在念珠菌眼部感染中得到验证。氟康唑和伏立康唑仍然是一线全身治疗,严重病例保留玻璃体注射和玻璃体切除术。意义:改善念珠菌眼内炎的预后需要统一的筛查方案,及时获得眼科护理和多学科合作。未来的研究应致力于确定最佳治疗时间,明确新兴诊断方法的作用,并利用远程医疗和成像技术来改善早期检测和纵向监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnosis and management of Candida endophthalmitis and chorioretinitis.

Background: Candida endophthalmitis (CE) and chorioretinitis are uncommon but potentially devastating complications of candidemia, associated with significant risks of vision loss and long-term morbidity. Effective management relies on timely diagnosis and targeted antifungal therapy. However, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches are hindered by inconsistent guidelines, limited evidence, and variations in clinical practice.

Objectives: This review synthesizes current knowledge on CE and chorioretinitis to provide a comprehensive framework for clinicians. It addresses diagnostic challenges, including ophthalmoscopy, imaging, and microbiological diagnostics, and therapeutic strategies such as systemic and intravitreal antifungal therapies, surgical interventions, and serial ophthalmic evaluations.

Sources: An extensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, with a focus on epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnostics, treatment, and outcomes. Guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America, European Confederation for Medical Mycology, and American Academy of Ophthalmology were reviewed.

Content: The prevalence of CE among patients with candidemia has increased from 1.8% in the pre-echinocandin era to 2.1% after the introduction of echinocandins. Diagnosis relies primarily on indirect ophthalmoscopy, the reference standard for retinal visualization. In selected cases, optical coherence tomography or fundus photography may support lesion assessment. Microbiological confirmation via vitreous sampling remains definitive but is often limited by low organism burden. Emerging diagnostics-such as clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-based fungal DNA assays-have shown promise. Although artificial intelligence-assisted imaging tools are established in other retinal diseases, they have not yet been validated for Candida ocular infections. Fluconazole and voriconazole remain first-line systemic therapies, with intravitreal injections and vitrectomy reserved for severe cases.

Implications: Improving outcomes in CE requires harmonized screening protocols, timely access to ophthalmologic care, and multidisciplinary collaboration. Future research should aim to refine diagnostic algorithms, define optimal treatment durations, clarify the role of emerging diagnostics, and leverage telemedicine and imaging technologies to improve early detection and longitudinal monitoring.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
441
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信