腹腔镜后腹膜部分肾切除术中附着性肾周脂肪预测因素的评价。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Samet Senel, Antonios Koudonas, Fatih Sandikci, Jens Rassweiler
{"title":"腹腔镜后腹膜部分肾切除术中附着性肾周脂肪预测因素的评价。","authors":"Samet Senel, Antonios Koudonas, Fatih Sandikci, Jens Rassweiler","doi":"10.1186/s12894-025-01826-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adherent perinephric fat (APF) represents a clinical situation, which increases the complexity of renal surgery. We aimed to elucidate the common characteristics of patients with APF and to evaluate the extent of outcome differentiation depending on the presence of APF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We made a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent laparoscopic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy for a localized renal tumor at our institution from May 2010 to January 2022. 238 patients were included in this study. Demographic, intraoperative, postoperative data and characteristics and comorbidities of all patients were evaluated. Radiographic data (tumor size, localization, side, exophytic rate, perinephric fat density [PFD]) were determined from preoperative contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography imaging studies. Adherent perinephric fat was classified intraoperatively by the operating surgeon. The patients were divided into two groups as the APF group and the non-APF group and predictors causing APF were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were higher in the APF group, but the difference between intraoperative complication rates, operation duration and amount of bleeding were statistically significant. (11.6% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.033; 130 vs. 120 min, p = 0.024; 60 vs. 30 cc, p = 0.016, respectively). The most common complications were conversion to open surgery due to failure of dissection of the tumor and bleeding requiring intraoperative transfusion in the groups. On multivariable analysis using stepwise regression model, we identified male gender (OR = 3.328; 95% Cl = 1.552-7.133; p = 0.002), PFD>-100.4 Hounsfield Unit (HU) (OR = 3.24; 95% Cl = 1.549-6.777; p = 0.002) and presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) (OR = 2.513; 95% Cl = 1.192-5.299; p = 0.015), as predictor of APF.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Male gender, presence of DM and PFD>-100.4 HU are predictors of APF. This endpoint is promising for application in gaining knowledge preoperatively about the dissection difficulty level.</p>","PeriodicalId":9285,"journal":{"name":"BMC Urology","volume":"25 1","pages":"141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12121113/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of factors predicting adherent perinephric fat in laparoscopic retroperitoenal partial nephrectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Samet Senel, Antonios Koudonas, Fatih Sandikci, Jens Rassweiler\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12894-025-01826-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adherent perinephric fat (APF) represents a clinical situation, which increases the complexity of renal surgery. We aimed to elucidate the common characteristics of patients with APF and to evaluate the extent of outcome differentiation depending on the presence of APF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We made a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent laparoscopic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy for a localized renal tumor at our institution from May 2010 to January 2022. 238 patients were included in this study. Demographic, intraoperative, postoperative data and characteristics and comorbidities of all patients were evaluated. Radiographic data (tumor size, localization, side, exophytic rate, perinephric fat density [PFD]) were determined from preoperative contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography imaging studies. Adherent perinephric fat was classified intraoperatively by the operating surgeon. The patients were divided into two groups as the APF group and the non-APF group and predictors causing APF were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were higher in the APF group, but the difference between intraoperative complication rates, operation duration and amount of bleeding were statistically significant. (11.6% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.033; 130 vs. 120 min, p = 0.024; 60 vs. 30 cc, p = 0.016, respectively). The most common complications were conversion to open surgery due to failure of dissection of the tumor and bleeding requiring intraoperative transfusion in the groups. On multivariable analysis using stepwise regression model, we identified male gender (OR = 3.328; 95% Cl = 1.552-7.133; p = 0.002), PFD>-100.4 Hounsfield Unit (HU) (OR = 3.24; 95% Cl = 1.549-6.777; p = 0.002) and presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) (OR = 2.513; 95% Cl = 1.192-5.299; p = 0.015), as predictor of APF.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Male gender, presence of DM and PFD>-100.4 HU are predictors of APF. This endpoint is promising for application in gaining knowledge preoperatively about the dissection difficulty level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Urology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12121113/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-025-01826-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-025-01826-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:附着性肾周脂肪(APF)代表了一种临床情况,它增加了肾脏手术的复杂性。我们的目的是阐明APF患者的共同特征,并评估取决于APF存在的结果分化程度。方法:我们对2010年5月至2022年1月在我院接受腹腔镜腹膜后部分肾切除术治疗局限性肾肿瘤的前瞻性数据库进行回顾性分析。238例患者纳入本研究。对所有患者的人口学、术中、术后数据、特征和合并症进行评估。影像学资料(肿瘤大小、定位、侧边、外生率、肾周脂肪密度[PFD])通过术前增强腹部计算机断层扫描成像研究确定。术中由外科医生对附着性肾周脂肪进行分类。将患者分为APF组和非APF组,并探讨引起APF的预测因素。结果:APF组术中、术后并发症发生率均高于APF组,但术中并发症发生率、手术时间、出血量差异均有统计学意义。(11.6% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.033;130分钟vs 120分钟,p = 0.024;60比30 cc, p = 0.016)。最常见的并发症是由于肿瘤解剖失败而转为开放手术和组中出血需要术中输血。采用逐步回归模型进行多变量分析,我们确定了男性性别(OR = 3.328;95% Cl = 1.552-7.133;p = 0.002), PFD > -100.4 Hounsfield单位(胡)(OR = 3.24;95% Cl = 1.549-6.777;p = 0.002)和是否存在糖尿病(DM) (OR = 2.513;95% Cl = 1.192 ~ 5.299;p = 0.015),作为APF的预测因子。结论:男性、DM、PFD bb0 ~ 100.4 HU是APF的预测因素。这一终点有望应用于术前获得关于解剖难度的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of factors predicting adherent perinephric fat in laparoscopic retroperitoenal partial nephrectomy.

Background: Adherent perinephric fat (APF) represents a clinical situation, which increases the complexity of renal surgery. We aimed to elucidate the common characteristics of patients with APF and to evaluate the extent of outcome differentiation depending on the presence of APF.

Methods: We made a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent laparoscopic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy for a localized renal tumor at our institution from May 2010 to January 2022. 238 patients were included in this study. Demographic, intraoperative, postoperative data and characteristics and comorbidities of all patients were evaluated. Radiographic data (tumor size, localization, side, exophytic rate, perinephric fat density [PFD]) were determined from preoperative contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography imaging studies. Adherent perinephric fat was classified intraoperatively by the operating surgeon. The patients were divided into two groups as the APF group and the non-APF group and predictors causing APF were investigated.

Results: Intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were higher in the APF group, but the difference between intraoperative complication rates, operation duration and amount of bleeding were statistically significant. (11.6% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.033; 130 vs. 120 min, p = 0.024; 60 vs. 30 cc, p = 0.016, respectively). The most common complications were conversion to open surgery due to failure of dissection of the tumor and bleeding requiring intraoperative transfusion in the groups. On multivariable analysis using stepwise regression model, we identified male gender (OR = 3.328; 95% Cl = 1.552-7.133; p = 0.002), PFD>-100.4 Hounsfield Unit (HU) (OR = 3.24; 95% Cl = 1.549-6.777; p = 0.002) and presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) (OR = 2.513; 95% Cl = 1.192-5.299; p = 0.015), as predictor of APF.

Conclusion: Male gender, presence of DM and PFD>-100.4 HU are predictors of APF. This endpoint is promising for application in gaining knowledge preoperatively about the dissection difficulty level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Urology
BMC Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Urology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of urological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The journal considers manuscripts in the following broad subject-specific sections of urology: Endourology and technology Epidemiology and health outcomes Pediatric urology Pre-clinical and basic research Reconstructive urology Sexual function and fertility Urological imaging Urological oncology Voiding dysfunction Case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信