{"title":"用三种不同的口腔内扫描仪评估种植体支撑整体锆单冠的边缘和内部配合度:体外研究。","authors":"Mohamed E Shoeeb, Manal Rh Abu-Eittah","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study assessed the vertical marginal and internal fit of a single monolithic zirconia crown supported by an implant fabricated digitally from three different intraoral scanners (IOSs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 30 models of implant-supported single monolithic zirconia 3Y-TPZ crown invested in epoxy resin were classified into two groups: 15 models for the marginal fit test and 15 for the internal fit test, which, based on the IOS that was employed, was then split into three subgroups (<i>n</i> = 5). A stereomicroscope with a 20× magnification was used to investigate vertical marginal fit. The replica technique was used to examine the samples' internal fit. The two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's honestly significant difference test (α = 0.05) were used to tabulate and statistically analyze the data, and <i>p</i> < 0.05 was used to determine whether the values were significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The calculated marginal gap results (µm) of samples fabricated with the Prime scanner was (44.4 ± 3.21 µm), followed by 3Shape scanner (52.7 ± 2.70 µm), and the highest detected gap was in samples fabricated and scanned by Omnicam scanner (62.8 ± 2.11 µm) at <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05. The detected internal fit of samples manufactured by the Prime scanner was (89.07 ± 4.22 µm) followed by the 3Shape scanner (97.24 ± 5.74 µm), and the least accurate (highest internal gap) was detected in samples scanned and fabricated by Omnicam scanner (120.41 ± 25.10 µm) at <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The IOSs showed a significant difference in accuracy, as the Prime scanner showed the best marginal and internal fit results followed by 3Shape. The least accurate was Omnicam scanners.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This study postulated that the success of implants supported by fixed single restoration depends on multiple factors. The marginal and internal fit are governing factors that lead to a successful long-life implant-supported single crown restoration. How to cite this article: Shoeeb ME, Abu-Eittah MRH. Assessment of Marginal and Internal Fit of Implant-supported Monolithic Zirconium Single Crown Fabricated from Three Different Intraoral Scanners: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(2):169-177.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"26 2","pages":"169-177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Marginal and Internal Fit of Implant-supported Monolithic Zirconium Single Crown Fabricated from Three Different Intraoral Scanners: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed E Shoeeb, Manal Rh Abu-Eittah\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study assessed the vertical marginal and internal fit of a single monolithic zirconia crown supported by an implant fabricated digitally from three different intraoral scanners (IOSs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 30 models of implant-supported single monolithic zirconia 3Y-TPZ crown invested in epoxy resin were classified into two groups: 15 models for the marginal fit test and 15 for the internal fit test, which, based on the IOS that was employed, was then split into three subgroups (<i>n</i> = 5). A stereomicroscope with a 20× magnification was used to investigate vertical marginal fit. The replica technique was used to examine the samples' internal fit. The two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's honestly significant difference test (α = 0.05) were used to tabulate and statistically analyze the data, and <i>p</i> < 0.05 was used to determine whether the values were significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The calculated marginal gap results (µm) of samples fabricated with the Prime scanner was (44.4 ± 3.21 µm), followed by 3Shape scanner (52.7 ± 2.70 µm), and the highest detected gap was in samples fabricated and scanned by Omnicam scanner (62.8 ± 2.11 µm) at <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05. The detected internal fit of samples manufactured by the Prime scanner was (89.07 ± 4.22 µm) followed by the 3Shape scanner (97.24 ± 5.74 µm), and the least accurate (highest internal gap) was detected in samples scanned and fabricated by Omnicam scanner (120.41 ± 25.10 µm) at <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The IOSs showed a significant difference in accuracy, as the Prime scanner showed the best marginal and internal fit results followed by 3Shape. The least accurate was Omnicam scanners.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This study postulated that the success of implants supported by fixed single restoration depends on multiple factors. The marginal and internal fit are governing factors that lead to a successful long-life implant-supported single crown restoration. How to cite this article: Shoeeb ME, Abu-Eittah MRH. Assessment of Marginal and Internal Fit of Implant-supported Monolithic Zirconium Single Crown Fabricated from Three Different Intraoral Scanners: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(2):169-177.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"169-177\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3829\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of Marginal and Internal Fit of Implant-supported Monolithic Zirconium Single Crown Fabricated from Three Different Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study.
Aim: This study assessed the vertical marginal and internal fit of a single monolithic zirconia crown supported by an implant fabricated digitally from three different intraoral scanners (IOSs).
Materials and methods: A total of 30 models of implant-supported single monolithic zirconia 3Y-TPZ crown invested in epoxy resin were classified into two groups: 15 models for the marginal fit test and 15 for the internal fit test, which, based on the IOS that was employed, was then split into three subgroups (n = 5). A stereomicroscope with a 20× magnification was used to investigate vertical marginal fit. The replica technique was used to examine the samples' internal fit. The two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's honestly significant difference test (α = 0.05) were used to tabulate and statistically analyze the data, and p < 0.05 was used to determine whether the values were significant.
Results: The calculated marginal gap results (µm) of samples fabricated with the Prime scanner was (44.4 ± 3.21 µm), followed by 3Shape scanner (52.7 ± 2.70 µm), and the highest detected gap was in samples fabricated and scanned by Omnicam scanner (62.8 ± 2.11 µm) at p ≤ 0.05. The detected internal fit of samples manufactured by the Prime scanner was (89.07 ± 4.22 µm) followed by the 3Shape scanner (97.24 ± 5.74 µm), and the least accurate (highest internal gap) was detected in samples scanned and fabricated by Omnicam scanner (120.41 ± 25.10 µm) at p ≤ 0.05.
Conclusion: The IOSs showed a significant difference in accuracy, as the Prime scanner showed the best marginal and internal fit results followed by 3Shape. The least accurate was Omnicam scanners.
Clinical significance: This study postulated that the success of implants supported by fixed single restoration depends on multiple factors. The marginal and internal fit are governing factors that lead to a successful long-life implant-supported single crown restoration. How to cite this article: Shoeeb ME, Abu-Eittah MRH. Assessment of Marginal and Internal Fit of Implant-supported Monolithic Zirconium Single Crown Fabricated from Three Different Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(2):169-177.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.