用三种不同的口腔内扫描仪评估种植体支撑整体锆单冠的边缘和内部配合度:体外研究。

Q3 Dentistry
Mohamed E Shoeeb, Manal Rh Abu-Eittah
{"title":"用三种不同的口腔内扫描仪评估种植体支撑整体锆单冠的边缘和内部配合度:体外研究。","authors":"Mohamed E Shoeeb, Manal Rh Abu-Eittah","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study assessed the vertical marginal and internal fit of a single monolithic zirconia crown supported by an implant fabricated digitally from three different intraoral scanners (IOSs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 30 models of implant-supported single monolithic zirconia 3Y-TPZ crown invested in epoxy resin were classified into two groups: 15 models for the marginal fit test and 15 for the internal fit test, which, based on the IOS that was employed, was then split into three subgroups (<i>n</i> = 5). A stereomicroscope with a 20× magnification was used to investigate vertical marginal fit. The replica technique was used to examine the samples' internal fit. The two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's honestly significant difference test (α = 0.05) were used to tabulate and statistically analyze the data, and <i>p</i> < 0.05 was used to determine whether the values were significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The calculated marginal gap results (µm) of samples fabricated with the Prime scanner was (44.4 ± 3.21 µm), followed by 3Shape scanner (52.7 ± 2.70 µm), and the highest detected gap was in samples fabricated and scanned by Omnicam scanner (62.8 ± 2.11 µm) at <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05. The detected internal fit of samples manufactured by the Prime scanner was (89.07 ± 4.22 µm) followed by the 3Shape scanner (97.24 ± 5.74 µm), and the least accurate (highest internal gap) was detected in samples scanned and fabricated by Omnicam scanner (120.41 ± 25.10 µm) at <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The IOSs showed a significant difference in accuracy, as the Prime scanner showed the best marginal and internal fit results followed by 3Shape. The least accurate was Omnicam scanners.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This study postulated that the success of implants supported by fixed single restoration depends on multiple factors. The marginal and internal fit are governing factors that lead to a successful long-life implant-supported single crown restoration. How to cite this article: Shoeeb ME, Abu-Eittah MRH. Assessment of Marginal and Internal Fit of Implant-supported Monolithic Zirconium Single Crown Fabricated from Three Different Intraoral Scanners: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(2):169-177.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"26 2","pages":"169-177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Marginal and Internal Fit of Implant-supported Monolithic Zirconium Single Crown Fabricated from Three Different Intraoral Scanners: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed E Shoeeb, Manal Rh Abu-Eittah\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study assessed the vertical marginal and internal fit of a single monolithic zirconia crown supported by an implant fabricated digitally from three different intraoral scanners (IOSs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 30 models of implant-supported single monolithic zirconia 3Y-TPZ crown invested in epoxy resin were classified into two groups: 15 models for the marginal fit test and 15 for the internal fit test, which, based on the IOS that was employed, was then split into three subgroups (<i>n</i> = 5). A stereomicroscope with a 20× magnification was used to investigate vertical marginal fit. The replica technique was used to examine the samples' internal fit. The two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's honestly significant difference test (α = 0.05) were used to tabulate and statistically analyze the data, and <i>p</i> < 0.05 was used to determine whether the values were significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The calculated marginal gap results (µm) of samples fabricated with the Prime scanner was (44.4 ± 3.21 µm), followed by 3Shape scanner (52.7 ± 2.70 µm), and the highest detected gap was in samples fabricated and scanned by Omnicam scanner (62.8 ± 2.11 µm) at <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05. The detected internal fit of samples manufactured by the Prime scanner was (89.07 ± 4.22 µm) followed by the 3Shape scanner (97.24 ± 5.74 µm), and the least accurate (highest internal gap) was detected in samples scanned and fabricated by Omnicam scanner (120.41 ± 25.10 µm) at <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The IOSs showed a significant difference in accuracy, as the Prime scanner showed the best marginal and internal fit results followed by 3Shape. The least accurate was Omnicam scanners.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This study postulated that the success of implants supported by fixed single restoration depends on multiple factors. The marginal and internal fit are governing factors that lead to a successful long-life implant-supported single crown restoration. How to cite this article: Shoeeb ME, Abu-Eittah MRH. Assessment of Marginal and Internal Fit of Implant-supported Monolithic Zirconium Single Crown Fabricated from Three Different Intraoral Scanners: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(2):169-177.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"169-177\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3829\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究评估了由三种不同的口内扫描仪(ios)数字制作的种植体支持的单个单片氧化锆冠的垂直边缘和内部配合。材料与方法:将30个种植体支持的单片氧化锆3Y-TPZ全冠环氧树脂充填模型分为两组:15个模型进行边缘拟合检验,15个模型进行内部拟合检验,再根据所采用的IOS分为3个亚组(n = 5)。采用20倍体视显微镜观察垂直边缘拟合。复制技术用于检查样品的内部拟合。采用双向方差分析和Tukey's诚实显著性差异检验(α = 0.05)对数据进行制表和统计分析,以p < 0.05判断数据是否显著。结果:Prime扫描仪加工样品计算出的边际间隙值(µm)为(44.4±3.21µm), 3Shape扫描仪次之(52.7±2.70µm), Omnicam扫描仪加工扫描样品检测到的间隙值最高(62.8±2.11µm), p≤0.05。Prime扫描仪测得的样品内配合度为(89.07±4.22µm), 3Shape扫描仪测得的样品内配合度为(97.24±5.74µm), Omnicam扫描仪测得的样品内配合度最低(120.41±25.10µm), p≤0.05。结论:iss的准确性有显著性差异,Prime扫描仪的边缘和内部拟合效果最好,3Shape次之。准确度最低的是Omnicam扫描仪。临床意义:本研究认为单根固定修复种植体的成功与否取决于多种因素。边缘配合和内部配合是决定种植体支持单冠修复成功与否的重要因素。如何引用本文:Shoeeb ME, Abu-Eittah MRH。用三种不同的口腔内扫描仪评估种植体支撑整体锆单冠的边缘和内部配合度:体外研究。[J]现代医学学报,2015;26(2):169-177。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Marginal and Internal Fit of Implant-supported Monolithic Zirconium Single Crown Fabricated from Three Different Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study.

Aim: This study assessed the vertical marginal and internal fit of a single monolithic zirconia crown supported by an implant fabricated digitally from three different intraoral scanners (IOSs).

Materials and methods: A total of 30 models of implant-supported single monolithic zirconia 3Y-TPZ crown invested in epoxy resin were classified into two groups: 15 models for the marginal fit test and 15 for the internal fit test, which, based on the IOS that was employed, was then split into three subgroups (n = 5). A stereomicroscope with a 20× magnification was used to investigate vertical marginal fit. The replica technique was used to examine the samples' internal fit. The two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's honestly significant difference test (α = 0.05) were used to tabulate and statistically analyze the data, and p < 0.05 was used to determine whether the values were significant.

Results: The calculated marginal gap results (µm) of samples fabricated with the Prime scanner was (44.4 ± 3.21 µm), followed by 3Shape scanner (52.7 ± 2.70 µm), and the highest detected gap was in samples fabricated and scanned by Omnicam scanner (62.8 ± 2.11 µm) at p ≤ 0.05. The detected internal fit of samples manufactured by the Prime scanner was (89.07 ± 4.22 µm) followed by the 3Shape scanner (97.24 ± 5.74 µm), and the least accurate (highest internal gap) was detected in samples scanned and fabricated by Omnicam scanner (120.41 ± 25.10 µm) at p ≤ 0.05.

Conclusion: The IOSs showed a significant difference in accuracy, as the Prime scanner showed the best marginal and internal fit results followed by 3Shape. The least accurate was Omnicam scanners.

Clinical significance: This study postulated that the success of implants supported by fixed single restoration depends on multiple factors. The marginal and internal fit are governing factors that lead to a successful long-life implant-supported single crown restoration. How to cite this article: Shoeeb ME, Abu-Eittah MRH. Assessment of Marginal and Internal Fit of Implant-supported Monolithic Zirconium Single Crown Fabricated from Three Different Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2025;26(2):169-177.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信