用Rasch分析验证冠心病患者“主观运动认知危险综合征”筛查工具的有效性。

IF 3.3 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Frontiers in aging Pub Date : 2025-05-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fragi.2025.1505847
Yiyi Chai, Yanrong Gu, Xiaomin Wu, Yini Wang, Ping Lin, Qingfang Ye, Ling Li
{"title":"用Rasch分析验证冠心病患者“主观运动认知危险综合征”筛查工具的有效性。","authors":"Yiyi Chai, Yanrong Gu, Xiaomin Wu, Yini Wang, Ping Lin, Qingfang Ye, Ling Li","doi":"10.3389/fragi.2025.1505847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Subjective motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR-S) is a well-established screening tool that has been validated for objective motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR-O) and predicted risk of incident dementia. MCR is associated with cardiovascular factors and coronary artery disease (CAD). MCR-S is crucial for remote cognitive screening but has only been validated in community settings so far. Our study aimed to validate a Chinese version of the MCR-S in CAD patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Chinese version of the MCR-S was obtained through a standardized forward-backward translation and cultural adaptation. 338 CAD patients were recruited. Traditional analysis based on classical test theory and Rasch analysis based on latent trait theory were performed on the MCR-S for validation. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was applied to determine the discriminative ability of MCR-S for the MCR-O in CAD patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MCR-S met the unidimensionality, lack of local dependency or disordered thresholds, and good fit value for each item of the Rasch model, the item-person map shows that the item's estimate of capacity is appropriate. MCR-S has good content validity, criterion-related validity, and test-retest reliability. An optimal cut-score of 4.6 on the MCR-S score was determined to have good sensitivity (79.2%) and specificity (71.3%) for MCR-O in CAD patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Chinese version of MCR-S meets the requirements of the Rasch model and has good validity in CAD patients. The validated MCR-S cutoff can support long-term monitoring and early intervention for CAD patients at risk of MCR-O.</p>","PeriodicalId":73061,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in aging","volume":"6 ","pages":"1505847"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12119596/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chinese validation of \\\"subjective motoric cognitive risk syndrome\\\" screening tool in patients with coronary artery disease using Rasch analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yiyi Chai, Yanrong Gu, Xiaomin Wu, Yini Wang, Ping Lin, Qingfang Ye, Ling Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fragi.2025.1505847\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Subjective motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR-S) is a well-established screening tool that has been validated for objective motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR-O) and predicted risk of incident dementia. MCR is associated with cardiovascular factors and coronary artery disease (CAD). MCR-S is crucial for remote cognitive screening but has only been validated in community settings so far. Our study aimed to validate a Chinese version of the MCR-S in CAD patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Chinese version of the MCR-S was obtained through a standardized forward-backward translation and cultural adaptation. 338 CAD patients were recruited. Traditional analysis based on classical test theory and Rasch analysis based on latent trait theory were performed on the MCR-S for validation. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was applied to determine the discriminative ability of MCR-S for the MCR-O in CAD patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MCR-S met the unidimensionality, lack of local dependency or disordered thresholds, and good fit value for each item of the Rasch model, the item-person map shows that the item's estimate of capacity is appropriate. MCR-S has good content validity, criterion-related validity, and test-retest reliability. An optimal cut-score of 4.6 on the MCR-S score was determined to have good sensitivity (79.2%) and specificity (71.3%) for MCR-O in CAD patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Chinese version of MCR-S meets the requirements of the Rasch model and has good validity in CAD patients. The validated MCR-S cutoff can support long-term monitoring and early intervention for CAD patients at risk of MCR-O.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in aging\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"1505847\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12119596/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fragi.2025.1505847\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fragi.2025.1505847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:主观运动认知风险综合征(MCR-S)是一种成熟的筛查工具,已被验证为客观运动认知风险综合征(MCR-O)和预测发生痴呆的风险。MCR与心血管因素和冠状动脉疾病(CAD)有关。MCR-S对远程认知筛查至关重要,但迄今为止仅在社区环境中得到验证。我们的研究旨在验证CAD患者的中文版MCR-S。方法:通过标准化的前后翻译和文化适应获得MCR-S的中文版。招募了338例CAD患者。采用基于经典测试理论的传统分析和基于潜在特质理论的Rasch分析对MCR-S进行验证。采用受试者工作特征分析确定MCR-S对CAD患者MCR-O的鉴别能力。结果:MCR-S满足Rasch模型各项目的单维性,缺乏局部依赖或无序阈值,拟合值较好,项目-人图显示项目对容量的估计是适当的。MCR-S具有良好的内容效度、效标相关效度和重测信度。MCR-S评分4.6的最佳切割分被确定为对CAD患者的MCR-O具有良好的敏感性(79.2%)和特异性(71.3%)。结论:中文版MCR-S符合Rasch模型的要求,在CAD患者中具有良好的效度。经过验证的MCR-S截止值可以支持有MCR-O风险的CAD患者的长期监测和早期干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chinese validation of "subjective motoric cognitive risk syndrome" screening tool in patients with coronary artery disease using Rasch analysis.

Objective: Subjective motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR-S) is a well-established screening tool that has been validated for objective motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR-O) and predicted risk of incident dementia. MCR is associated with cardiovascular factors and coronary artery disease (CAD). MCR-S is crucial for remote cognitive screening but has only been validated in community settings so far. Our study aimed to validate a Chinese version of the MCR-S in CAD patients.

Method: The Chinese version of the MCR-S was obtained through a standardized forward-backward translation and cultural adaptation. 338 CAD patients were recruited. Traditional analysis based on classical test theory and Rasch analysis based on latent trait theory were performed on the MCR-S for validation. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was applied to determine the discriminative ability of MCR-S for the MCR-O in CAD patients.

Results: The MCR-S met the unidimensionality, lack of local dependency or disordered thresholds, and good fit value for each item of the Rasch model, the item-person map shows that the item's estimate of capacity is appropriate. MCR-S has good content validity, criterion-related validity, and test-retest reliability. An optimal cut-score of 4.6 on the MCR-S score was determined to have good sensitivity (79.2%) and specificity (71.3%) for MCR-O in CAD patients.

Conclusion: The Chinese version of MCR-S meets the requirements of the Rasch model and has good validity in CAD patients. The validated MCR-S cutoff can support long-term monitoring and early intervention for CAD patients at risk of MCR-O.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信