反身起跳高度和一次最大后蹲重复是否与负重前后踢腿的峰值力有关?

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Vladan Oláh, Vít Třebický, Jan Maleček, Vladimír Michalička, Jacek Wąsik, Michal Vágner
{"title":"反身起跳高度和一次最大后蹲重复是否与负重前后踢腿的峰值力有关?","authors":"Vladan Oláh, Vít Třebický, Jan Maleček, Vladimír Michalička, Jacek Wąsik, Michal Vágner","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Oláh, V, Třebický, V, Maleček, J, Michalička, V, Wąsik, J, and Vágner, M. Is countermovement jump height and one repetition maximum back squat associated with the peak force of a front kick with and without carried load? J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-The front kick is a fundamental technique used in self-defense and hand to hand combat. This study aimed to test whether front kick performance, both with and without a 30-kg carried load, can be effectively estimated or tracked through commonly available testing procedures such as the countermovement jumps (CMJ) and one repetition maximum back squat (1RM BS). In 2 testing sessions, 21 male participants (mean age = 22.7 years, SD = 1.9) performed 1RM BS, 5 front kicks peak force (FK) without and with 30-kg carried load (FK30), and 3 CMJ without and with 30-kg carried load (CMJ30). A force plate measured the peak force (N) of the FK and FK30 and the height (cm) of the CMJ and CMJ30. Statistically significant correlations were found between CMJ and FK (r = 0.55 [0.225-1], p = 0.005) and CMJ and 1RM BS (r = 0.54 [0.219-1, p = 0.005]). Carried load reduced both CMJ height by 61% (d = 3.35 [2.543-∞], p < 0.001) and FK peak force by 23% (d = 1.33 [0.828-∞], p < 0.001), compared without load condition. A regression model using 1RM BS and CMJ explained 31.5% of FK variance, with only the height of CMJ being statistically significantly associated, β = 0.626, p = 0.015. The study demonstrates that although there is a relationship between explosive power and maximum strengths, FK is more related to CMJ height than 1RM BS. From a practical standpoint, the study suggests that explosive power shows a better association with the FK than the maximal strength. Thus, training programs focused on lower limb explosive power could allow athletes and military personnel to achieve higher FK. Combat sports trainers and hand-to-hand combat instructors may thus consider accordingly updating their training schemes, emphasizing plyometrics and other explosive training methods for enhancing the peak force of kicks.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Countermovement Jump Height and One Repetition Maximum Back Squat Associated With the Peak Force of a Front Kick With and Without Carried Load?\",\"authors\":\"Vladan Oláh, Vít Třebický, Jan Maleček, Vladimír Michalička, Jacek Wąsik, Michal Vágner\",\"doi\":\"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Oláh, V, Třebický, V, Maleček, J, Michalička, V, Wąsik, J, and Vágner, M. Is countermovement jump height and one repetition maximum back squat associated with the peak force of a front kick with and without carried load? J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-The front kick is a fundamental technique used in self-defense and hand to hand combat. This study aimed to test whether front kick performance, both with and without a 30-kg carried load, can be effectively estimated or tracked through commonly available testing procedures such as the countermovement jumps (CMJ) and one repetition maximum back squat (1RM BS). In 2 testing sessions, 21 male participants (mean age = 22.7 years, SD = 1.9) performed 1RM BS, 5 front kicks peak force (FK) without and with 30-kg carried load (FK30), and 3 CMJ without and with 30-kg carried load (CMJ30). A force plate measured the peak force (N) of the FK and FK30 and the height (cm) of the CMJ and CMJ30. Statistically significant correlations were found between CMJ and FK (r = 0.55 [0.225-1], p = 0.005) and CMJ and 1RM BS (r = 0.54 [0.219-1, p = 0.005]). Carried load reduced both CMJ height by 61% (d = 3.35 [2.543-∞], p < 0.001) and FK peak force by 23% (d = 1.33 [0.828-∞], p < 0.001), compared without load condition. A regression model using 1RM BS and CMJ explained 31.5% of FK variance, with only the height of CMJ being statistically significantly associated, β = 0.626, p = 0.015. The study demonstrates that although there is a relationship between explosive power and maximum strengths, FK is more related to CMJ height than 1RM BS. From a practical standpoint, the study suggests that explosive power shows a better association with the FK than the maximal strength. Thus, training programs focused on lower limb explosive power could allow athletes and military personnel to achieve higher FK. Combat sports trainers and hand-to-hand combat instructors may thus consider accordingly updating their training schemes, emphasizing plyometrics and other explosive training methods for enhancing the peak force of kicks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005128\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005128","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:Oláh, V, Třebický, V, male ek, J, michali ka, V, Wąsik, J, Vágner, M.反动作跳跃高度和一次最大后蹲重复是否与负重前后踢腿的峰值力有关?J力量训练XX(X): 000-000, 2025-前踢是自卫和肉搏战中使用的基本技术。本研究旨在测试是否可以通过常用的测试程序,如反动作跳跃(CMJ)和一次最大后蹲(1RM BS),有效地估计或跟踪有或没有30公斤负重的前踢性能。在2个测试中,21名男性参与者(平均年龄22.7岁,SD = 1.9)进行了1个rm BS, 5个前踢峰值力(FK),无30公斤负重(FK30), 3个CMJ,无30公斤负重(CMJ30)。测力板测量了FK和FK30的峰值力(N)以及CMJ和CMJ30的高度(cm)。CMJ与FK (r = 0.55 [0.225-1], p = 0.005)、CMJ与1RM BS (r = 0.54 [0.219-1, p = 0.005])具有统计学意义。与无负载相比,负重使CMJ高度降低61% (d = 3.35[2.543-∞],p < 0.001), FK峰值力降低23% (d = 1.33[0.828-∞],p < 0.001)。使用1RM BS和CMJ的回归模型解释了31.5%的FK方差,只有CMJ的高度具有统计学意义,β = 0.626, p = 0.015。研究表明,虽然爆发力与最大强度存在关系,但FK与CMJ高度的关系大于1RM BS。从实际的角度来看,该研究表明,爆发力比最大力量与FK的关系更好。因此,专注于下肢爆发力的训练计划可以让运动员和军事人员获得更高的FK。因此,格斗运动教练和徒手格斗教练可能会考虑相应地更新他们的训练计划,强调增强式训练和其他爆发力训练方法,以提高踢腿的峰值力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Countermovement Jump Height and One Repetition Maximum Back Squat Associated With the Peak Force of a Front Kick With and Without Carried Load?

Abstract: Oláh, V, Třebický, V, Maleček, J, Michalička, V, Wąsik, J, and Vágner, M. Is countermovement jump height and one repetition maximum back squat associated with the peak force of a front kick with and without carried load? J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-The front kick is a fundamental technique used in self-defense and hand to hand combat. This study aimed to test whether front kick performance, both with and without a 30-kg carried load, can be effectively estimated or tracked through commonly available testing procedures such as the countermovement jumps (CMJ) and one repetition maximum back squat (1RM BS). In 2 testing sessions, 21 male participants (mean age = 22.7 years, SD = 1.9) performed 1RM BS, 5 front kicks peak force (FK) without and with 30-kg carried load (FK30), and 3 CMJ without and with 30-kg carried load (CMJ30). A force plate measured the peak force (N) of the FK and FK30 and the height (cm) of the CMJ and CMJ30. Statistically significant correlations were found between CMJ and FK (r = 0.55 [0.225-1], p = 0.005) and CMJ and 1RM BS (r = 0.54 [0.219-1, p = 0.005]). Carried load reduced both CMJ height by 61% (d = 3.35 [2.543-∞], p < 0.001) and FK peak force by 23% (d = 1.33 [0.828-∞], p < 0.001), compared without load condition. A regression model using 1RM BS and CMJ explained 31.5% of FK variance, with only the height of CMJ being statistically significantly associated, β = 0.626, p = 0.015. The study demonstrates that although there is a relationship between explosive power and maximum strengths, FK is more related to CMJ height than 1RM BS. From a practical standpoint, the study suggests that explosive power shows a better association with the FK than the maximal strength. Thus, training programs focused on lower limb explosive power could allow athletes and military personnel to achieve higher FK. Combat sports trainers and hand-to-hand combat instructors may thus consider accordingly updating their training schemes, emphasizing plyometrics and other explosive training methods for enhancing the peak force of kicks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信