经验性万古霉素治疗腹腔感染的财务和临床毒性:一项队列研究。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Laura M Ebbitt, Jeremy D VanHoose, Samantha Manci, Aric Schadler, Abigail Leonhard, Jitesh A Patel
{"title":"经验性万古霉素治疗腹腔感染的财务和临床毒性:一项队列研究。","authors":"Laura M Ebbitt, Jeremy D VanHoose, Samantha Manci, Aric Schadler, Abigail Leonhard, Jitesh A Patel","doi":"10.1089/sur.2024.269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Vancomycin for intra-abdominal infections (IAI) should be reserved for healthcare-acquired infections, history of multiple interventions, or methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA). The MRSA incidence is low; however, fear of missing MRSA leads to overutilization. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This single-center retrospective cohort study evaluated the cost and risks of empiric vancomycin for IAI. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of MRSA-positive culture and surveillance testing. Secondary outcomes included acute kidney injury (AKI) incidence, progression to dialysis, direct costs of vancomycin overutilization, length of stay, and 30-day mortality. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 1,045 patients with IAI were identified and 491 (47%) received at least one dose of vancomycin. Thirty patients (2.9%) grew MRSA. Of those who grew MRSA, 21 (70%) were MRSA positive on the surveillance multi-drug resistance (MDR) culture or by polymerase chain reaction during hospitalization. There were no deaths within the MRSA group. AKI developed in 351 (33.6%) patients during their hospitalization, with 49.6% occurring within 48 hours of vancomycin administration. Of the 65 patients (6.9%) who required dialysis, 27 patients (42%) received vancomycin. The cost of unnecessary doses equated to $21,655 and $188,643.84 for vancomycin levels. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Given the low MRSA culture incidence, it is reasonable to avoid vancomycin as empiric treatment for those being admitted for IAI alone to reduce the risk of AKI and reduce healthcare costs. Vancomycin should be limited mainly to those with a positive MRSA culture with consideration of vancomycin in those at highest MRSA risk such as a history of MRSA or known MRSA colonization.</p>","PeriodicalId":22109,"journal":{"name":"Surgical infections","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Financial and Clinical Toxicity of Empiric Vancomycin for Intra-Abdominal Infections: A Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Laura M Ebbitt, Jeremy D VanHoose, Samantha Manci, Aric Schadler, Abigail Leonhard, Jitesh A Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/sur.2024.269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Vancomycin for intra-abdominal infections (IAI) should be reserved for healthcare-acquired infections, history of multiple interventions, or methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA). The MRSA incidence is low; however, fear of missing MRSA leads to overutilization. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This single-center retrospective cohort study evaluated the cost and risks of empiric vancomycin for IAI. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of MRSA-positive culture and surveillance testing. Secondary outcomes included acute kidney injury (AKI) incidence, progression to dialysis, direct costs of vancomycin overutilization, length of stay, and 30-day mortality. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 1,045 patients with IAI were identified and 491 (47%) received at least one dose of vancomycin. Thirty patients (2.9%) grew MRSA. Of those who grew MRSA, 21 (70%) were MRSA positive on the surveillance multi-drug resistance (MDR) culture or by polymerase chain reaction during hospitalization. There were no deaths within the MRSA group. AKI developed in 351 (33.6%) patients during their hospitalization, with 49.6% occurring within 48 hours of vancomycin administration. Of the 65 patients (6.9%) who required dialysis, 27 patients (42%) received vancomycin. The cost of unnecessary doses equated to $21,655 and $188,643.84 for vancomycin levels. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Given the low MRSA culture incidence, it is reasonable to avoid vancomycin as empiric treatment for those being admitted for IAI alone to reduce the risk of AKI and reduce healthcare costs. Vancomycin should be limited mainly to those with a positive MRSA culture with consideration of vancomycin in those at highest MRSA risk such as a history of MRSA or known MRSA colonization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical infections\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical infections\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2024.269\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical infections","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2024.269","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:万古霉素用于腹腔内感染(IAI)应保留用于医疗获得性感染、多次干预史或耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)。MRSA发病率低;然而,害怕错过MRSA导致过度使用。方法:本单中心回顾性队列研究评估经验性万古霉素治疗IAI的成本和风险。主要目的是确定mrsa阳性培养和监测试验的发生率。次要结局包括急性肾损伤(AKI)发生率、透析进展、过度使用万古霉素的直接成本、住院时间和30天死亡率。结果:共有1045例IAI患者被确定,其中491例(47%)接受了至少一剂万古霉素治疗。30例(2.9%)出现MRSA生长。在MRSA生长的患者中,21例(70%)住院期间多药耐药(MDR)监测培养或聚合酶链反应均为MRSA阳性。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌组中没有死亡病例。351例(33.6%)患者在住院期间发生AKI,其中49.6%发生在万古霉素给药后48小时内。在65名需要透析的患者(6.9%)中,27名患者(42%)接受了万古霉素治疗。不必要剂量的费用相当于21,655美元和万古霉素水平的188,643.84美元。结论:考虑到MRSA培养发生率较低,单纯因IAI入院的患者应避免使用万古霉素作为经验性治疗,以降低AKI的风险,降低医疗费用。万古霉素应主要局限于MRSA培养阳性的患者,同时考虑万古霉素适用于MRSA风险最高的人群,如有MRSA病史或已知MRSA定植的人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Financial and Clinical Toxicity of Empiric Vancomycin for Intra-Abdominal Infections: A Cohort Study.

Background: Vancomycin for intra-abdominal infections (IAI) should be reserved for healthcare-acquired infections, history of multiple interventions, or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The MRSA incidence is low; however, fear of missing MRSA leads to overutilization. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study evaluated the cost and risks of empiric vancomycin for IAI. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of MRSA-positive culture and surveillance testing. Secondary outcomes included acute kidney injury (AKI) incidence, progression to dialysis, direct costs of vancomycin overutilization, length of stay, and 30-day mortality. Results: A total of 1,045 patients with IAI were identified and 491 (47%) received at least one dose of vancomycin. Thirty patients (2.9%) grew MRSA. Of those who grew MRSA, 21 (70%) were MRSA positive on the surveillance multi-drug resistance (MDR) culture or by polymerase chain reaction during hospitalization. There were no deaths within the MRSA group. AKI developed in 351 (33.6%) patients during their hospitalization, with 49.6% occurring within 48 hours of vancomycin administration. Of the 65 patients (6.9%) who required dialysis, 27 patients (42%) received vancomycin. The cost of unnecessary doses equated to $21,655 and $188,643.84 for vancomycin levels. Conclusion: Given the low MRSA culture incidence, it is reasonable to avoid vancomycin as empiric treatment for those being admitted for IAI alone to reduce the risk of AKI and reduce healthcare costs. Vancomycin should be limited mainly to those with a positive MRSA culture with consideration of vancomycin in those at highest MRSA risk such as a history of MRSA or known MRSA colonization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical infections
Surgical infections INFECTIOUS DISEASES-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Infections provides comprehensive and authoritative information on the biology, prevention, and management of post-operative infections. Original articles cover the latest advancements, new therapeutic management strategies, and translational research that is being applied to improve clinical outcomes and successfully treat post-operative infections. Surgical Infections coverage includes: -Peritonitis and intra-abdominal infections- Surgical site infections- Pneumonia and other nosocomial infections- Cellular and humoral immunity- Biology of the host response- Organ dysfunction syndromes- Antibiotic use- Resistant and opportunistic pathogens- Epidemiology and prevention- The operating room environment- Diagnostic studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信