拉伸对跑步经济性的急性和慢性影响:meta分析的系统回顾。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Konstantin Warneke, Maximilian Zechner, Stanislav D Siegel, Daniel Jochum, Leefke Brunssen, Andreas Konrad
{"title":"拉伸对跑步经济性的急性和慢性影响:meta分析的系统回顾。","authors":"Konstantin Warneke, Maximilian Zechner, Stanislav D Siegel, Daniel Jochum, Leefke Brunssen, Andreas Konrad","doi":"10.1186/s40798-025-00859-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Running economy (RE) determines the performance of endurance athletes. While stretching has been practised for decades, and is still one common integral component of warm-up routine, muscle stretching is also associated with decreased stiffness. For RE energy storage in the tendons which is accompanied with stiffness is of crucial importance. In turn, avoidance of pre-running stretching was frequently recommended. Although some studies supported this recommendation, the evidence is controversial. Nevertheless, yet, no systematic review on the effects of stretching on RE with effect size (ES) quantification was performed. Consequently, with this systematic review with meta-analysis, we aim to provide the first overview on this topic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In adherence to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we meta-analyzed effect sizes from three databases using PICOS guidelines on stretching effects on RE in healthy participants using robust variance estimation. Heterogeneity was reduced using subgroup analyses while meta-regression evaluated whether running velocity potentially moderates results. Risk of Bias was assessed using the PEDro scale, certainty of evidence was classified via GRADE working group criteria. The study protocol was registered in Open Science Framework https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MA8D4 ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, low certainty of evidence pooled from 15 studies with a total of 181 participants indicated that stretching did not significantly moderate RE acutely (p = 0.21-0.65), neither in general, nor were there any stretching types (dynamic, static and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation) that affected this result. Due to the limited number of chronic studies found in the literature, long-term stretching effects were exclusively evaluated qualitatively. Meaningful heterogeneity and reduced methodological quality (PEDro Score: 4.88, fair) contributed to certainty of evidence downgrading.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In contrast to common beliefs that stretching decreased stiffness parameters and would therefore hamper RE, current evidence does not support any effect of stretching on RE in running athletes. However, several flaws such as no investigation of the underlying mechanisms (e.g., stiffness), small sample sizes, determining RE at different velocities, and the implementation of unreasonable stretching durations strongly biased conclusions. Especially on chronic effects there is a large demand for improved evidence, including underlying mechanisms investigation. Yet, it seems unreasonable to avoid pre-running stretching to prevent RE decreases.</p>","PeriodicalId":21788,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine - Open","volume":"11 1","pages":"61"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12122984/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute and Chronic Effects of Stretching on Running Economy: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Konstantin Warneke, Maximilian Zechner, Stanislav D Siegel, Daniel Jochum, Leefke Brunssen, Andreas Konrad\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40798-025-00859-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Running economy (RE) determines the performance of endurance athletes. While stretching has been practised for decades, and is still one common integral component of warm-up routine, muscle stretching is also associated with decreased stiffness. For RE energy storage in the tendons which is accompanied with stiffness is of crucial importance. In turn, avoidance of pre-running stretching was frequently recommended. Although some studies supported this recommendation, the evidence is controversial. Nevertheless, yet, no systematic review on the effects of stretching on RE with effect size (ES) quantification was performed. Consequently, with this systematic review with meta-analysis, we aim to provide the first overview on this topic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In adherence to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we meta-analyzed effect sizes from three databases using PICOS guidelines on stretching effects on RE in healthy participants using robust variance estimation. Heterogeneity was reduced using subgroup analyses while meta-regression evaluated whether running velocity potentially moderates results. Risk of Bias was assessed using the PEDro scale, certainty of evidence was classified via GRADE working group criteria. The study protocol was registered in Open Science Framework https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MA8D4 ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, low certainty of evidence pooled from 15 studies with a total of 181 participants indicated that stretching did not significantly moderate RE acutely (p = 0.21-0.65), neither in general, nor were there any stretching types (dynamic, static and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation) that affected this result. Due to the limited number of chronic studies found in the literature, long-term stretching effects were exclusively evaluated qualitatively. Meaningful heterogeneity and reduced methodological quality (PEDro Score: 4.88, fair) contributed to certainty of evidence downgrading.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In contrast to common beliefs that stretching decreased stiffness parameters and would therefore hamper RE, current evidence does not support any effect of stretching on RE in running athletes. However, several flaws such as no investigation of the underlying mechanisms (e.g., stiffness), small sample sizes, determining RE at different velocities, and the implementation of unreasonable stretching durations strongly biased conclusions. Especially on chronic effects there is a large demand for improved evidence, including underlying mechanisms investigation. Yet, it seems unreasonable to avoid pre-running stretching to prevent RE decreases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Medicine - Open\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12122984/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Medicine - Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-025-00859-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine - Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-025-00859-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:跑步经济性(RE)决定耐力运动员的成绩。虽然拉伸已经练习了几十年,并且仍然是热身常规的一个常见组成部分,肌肉拉伸也与降低僵硬有关。对于再生能源来说,肌腱的能量储存是至关重要的,它伴随着刚度。反过来,经常建议避免跑步前拉伸。尽管一些研究支持这一建议,但证据是有争议的。然而,没有系统评价拉伸对RE的影响,并进行效应量(ES)量化。因此,通过荟萃分析的系统综述,我们的目标是提供关于该主题的第一个概述。方法:遵循PRISMA 2020指南,我们使用稳健方差估计,从三个数据库中使用PICOS指南对健康参与者拉伸对RE的影响进行meta分析。使用亚组分析减少异质性,而元回归评估跑步速度是否可能调节结果。偏倚风险采用PEDro量表进行评估,证据的确定性根据GRADE工作组标准进行分类。研究方案已在开放科学框架(https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MA8D4)中注册。结果:总体而言,来自15项研究共181名参与者的低确定性证据表明,拉伸不会显著缓解急性RE (p = 0.21-0.65),一般情况下,也没有任何拉伸类型(动态、静态和本体感觉神经肌肉促进)影响这一结果。由于文献中发现的慢性研究数量有限,长期拉伸效果仅定性评估。有意义的异质性和降低的方法学质量(PEDro评分:4.88,公平)导致证据降级的确定性。结论:与通常认为拉伸会降低刚度参数从而阻碍RE的观点相反,目前的证据并不支持拉伸对跑步运动员的RE有任何影响。然而,一些缺陷,如没有调查潜在的机制(例如,刚度),样本量小,确定不同速度下的RE,以及实施不合理的拉伸持续时间,严重影响了结论。特别是在慢性效应方面,对改进证据的需求很大,包括对潜在机制的调查。然而,避免跑步前拉伸以防止RE下降似乎是不合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acute and Chronic Effects of Stretching on Running Economy: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Background: Running economy (RE) determines the performance of endurance athletes. While stretching has been practised for decades, and is still one common integral component of warm-up routine, muscle stretching is also associated with decreased stiffness. For RE energy storage in the tendons which is accompanied with stiffness is of crucial importance. In turn, avoidance of pre-running stretching was frequently recommended. Although some studies supported this recommendation, the evidence is controversial. Nevertheless, yet, no systematic review on the effects of stretching on RE with effect size (ES) quantification was performed. Consequently, with this systematic review with meta-analysis, we aim to provide the first overview on this topic.

Methods: In adherence to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we meta-analyzed effect sizes from three databases using PICOS guidelines on stretching effects on RE in healthy participants using robust variance estimation. Heterogeneity was reduced using subgroup analyses while meta-regression evaluated whether running velocity potentially moderates results. Risk of Bias was assessed using the PEDro scale, certainty of evidence was classified via GRADE working group criteria. The study protocol was registered in Open Science Framework https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MA8D4 ).

Results: Overall, low certainty of evidence pooled from 15 studies with a total of 181 participants indicated that stretching did not significantly moderate RE acutely (p = 0.21-0.65), neither in general, nor were there any stretching types (dynamic, static and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation) that affected this result. Due to the limited number of chronic studies found in the literature, long-term stretching effects were exclusively evaluated qualitatively. Meaningful heterogeneity and reduced methodological quality (PEDro Score: 4.88, fair) contributed to certainty of evidence downgrading.

Conclusions: In contrast to common beliefs that stretching decreased stiffness parameters and would therefore hamper RE, current evidence does not support any effect of stretching on RE in running athletes. However, several flaws such as no investigation of the underlying mechanisms (e.g., stiffness), small sample sizes, determining RE at different velocities, and the implementation of unreasonable stretching durations strongly biased conclusions. Especially on chronic effects there is a large demand for improved evidence, including underlying mechanisms investigation. Yet, it seems unreasonable to avoid pre-running stretching to prevent RE decreases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Medicine - Open
Sports Medicine - Open SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
142
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信