Victor V Feofilaktov, Daniel Heil, Evgeny B Myakinchenko, Daniel M Smith, Andrey S Kruchkov
{"title":"在夏季大型自行车比赛中,优秀的越野滑雪运动员比两项运动员有更好的生理适应能力。","authors":"Victor V Feofilaktov, Daniel Heil, Evgeny B Myakinchenko, Daniel M Smith, Andrey S Kruchkov","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Feofilaktov, VV, Heil, D, Myakinchenko, EB, Smith, DM, and Kruchkov, AS. Elite cross-country skiers develop greater physiological adaptations than biathletes in summer macrocycle. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-The study aimed to compare changes in aerobic, anaerobic, body composition, and training load parameters during a 6-month macrocycle in elite cross-country skiers (XC) and biathletes (BI). Twenty-six physiological and 8 training load parameters were analyzed retrospectively every month throughout a 6-month summer macrocycle for 32 elite male XC and 41 BI during 7 consecutive years. During the macrocycle, XC demonstrated lower body fat (6.7 ± 1.7 vs. 7.5 ± 1.5 kg, p < 0.001) and higher muscle mass (39.7 ± 3.0 vs. 38.5 ± 3.6 kg, p < 0.001) compared with BI. In addition, XC exhibited superior aerobic capacities at ventilatory threshold (VT), including oxygen pulse, oxygen uptake, power output, stroke volume, maximum oxygen uptake (V̇o2max), and cardiac output, and maximum rate and power output for 10-second Wingate double poling (all p < 0.001). Both XC and BI showed simultaneous improvements in aerobic and anaerobic capacities, peaking during the competition period. The most consistent improvements observed throughout the macrocycle were in the upper-body power output at VT and V̇o2max (correlation with the number of training days r = 0.3-0.4, p < 0.05). Cross-country skiers engaged in significantly higher volumes of low-intensity training (LIT), total strength training, and sport-specific training (SST) compared with BI (all p < 0.001). Conversely, BI had higher volume of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in the final 4 months of the macrocycle. In conclusion, differences in training volumes (LIT, SST, and total strength) likely contributed to superior adaptations observed in XC. The study found that physiological adaptations were delayed rather than concurrent throughout the macrocycle.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elite Cross-Country Skiers Develop Greater Physiological Adaptations Than Biathletes in Summer Macrocycle.\",\"authors\":\"Victor V Feofilaktov, Daniel Heil, Evgeny B Myakinchenko, Daniel M Smith, Andrey S Kruchkov\",\"doi\":\"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Feofilaktov, VV, Heil, D, Myakinchenko, EB, Smith, DM, and Kruchkov, AS. Elite cross-country skiers develop greater physiological adaptations than biathletes in summer macrocycle. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-The study aimed to compare changes in aerobic, anaerobic, body composition, and training load parameters during a 6-month macrocycle in elite cross-country skiers (XC) and biathletes (BI). Twenty-six physiological and 8 training load parameters were analyzed retrospectively every month throughout a 6-month summer macrocycle for 32 elite male XC and 41 BI during 7 consecutive years. During the macrocycle, XC demonstrated lower body fat (6.7 ± 1.7 vs. 7.5 ± 1.5 kg, p < 0.001) and higher muscle mass (39.7 ± 3.0 vs. 38.5 ± 3.6 kg, p < 0.001) compared with BI. In addition, XC exhibited superior aerobic capacities at ventilatory threshold (VT), including oxygen pulse, oxygen uptake, power output, stroke volume, maximum oxygen uptake (V̇o2max), and cardiac output, and maximum rate and power output for 10-second Wingate double poling (all p < 0.001). Both XC and BI showed simultaneous improvements in aerobic and anaerobic capacities, peaking during the competition period. The most consistent improvements observed throughout the macrocycle were in the upper-body power output at VT and V̇o2max (correlation with the number of training days r = 0.3-0.4, p < 0.05). Cross-country skiers engaged in significantly higher volumes of low-intensity training (LIT), total strength training, and sport-specific training (SST) compared with BI (all p < 0.001). Conversely, BI had higher volume of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in the final 4 months of the macrocycle. In conclusion, differences in training volumes (LIT, SST, and total strength) likely contributed to superior adaptations observed in XC. The study found that physiological adaptations were delayed rather than concurrent throughout the macrocycle.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005108\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005108","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Elite Cross-Country Skiers Develop Greater Physiological Adaptations Than Biathletes in Summer Macrocycle.
Abstract: Feofilaktov, VV, Heil, D, Myakinchenko, EB, Smith, DM, and Kruchkov, AS. Elite cross-country skiers develop greater physiological adaptations than biathletes in summer macrocycle. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2025-The study aimed to compare changes in aerobic, anaerobic, body composition, and training load parameters during a 6-month macrocycle in elite cross-country skiers (XC) and biathletes (BI). Twenty-six physiological and 8 training load parameters were analyzed retrospectively every month throughout a 6-month summer macrocycle for 32 elite male XC and 41 BI during 7 consecutive years. During the macrocycle, XC demonstrated lower body fat (6.7 ± 1.7 vs. 7.5 ± 1.5 kg, p < 0.001) and higher muscle mass (39.7 ± 3.0 vs. 38.5 ± 3.6 kg, p < 0.001) compared with BI. In addition, XC exhibited superior aerobic capacities at ventilatory threshold (VT), including oxygen pulse, oxygen uptake, power output, stroke volume, maximum oxygen uptake (V̇o2max), and cardiac output, and maximum rate and power output for 10-second Wingate double poling (all p < 0.001). Both XC and BI showed simultaneous improvements in aerobic and anaerobic capacities, peaking during the competition period. The most consistent improvements observed throughout the macrocycle were in the upper-body power output at VT and V̇o2max (correlation with the number of training days r = 0.3-0.4, p < 0.05). Cross-country skiers engaged in significantly higher volumes of low-intensity training (LIT), total strength training, and sport-specific training (SST) compared with BI (all p < 0.001). Conversely, BI had higher volume of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in the final 4 months of the macrocycle. In conclusion, differences in training volumes (LIT, SST, and total strength) likely contributed to superior adaptations observed in XC. The study found that physiological adaptations were delayed rather than concurrent throughout the macrocycle.
期刊介绍:
The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.