Maria Alva, Sarahfaye Dolman, Slaven Sikirica, Paul Kolm, Katherine Andrade, Zugui Zhang, William S Weintraub
{"title":"心力衰竭诊断后的生活质量:美国人口水平的趋势","authors":"Maria Alva, Sarahfaye Dolman, Slaven Sikirica, Paul Kolm, Katherine Andrade, Zugui Zhang, William S Weintraub","doi":"10.1186/s12955-025-02372-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with heart failure (HF) experience various symptoms making both diagnosis and disease burden estimates challenging. While HF-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are widely used, their focus on clinical cohorts limits their generalizability. Preference-based measures like the EQ-5D enable standardized health-related quality of life (HRQoL) comparisons across conditions, supporting resource allocation decisions. The CDC's Healthy Days (HD) Survey-a simple two-question tool that can be mapped to the EQ-5D-offers a broader approach to tracking HRQoL but remains underutilized in HF populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a nationally representative U.S. sample, we mapped HD Survey responses to EQ-5D utility scores to compare HRQoL between individuals with and without HF and examined changes in HRQoL over time. We assessed whether HD-derived scores align with HF-specific utility measures to support population-level health monitoring.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with HF report significantly more physically unhealthy days (8.46 vs. 3.42) and mentally unhealthy days (5.42 vs. 3.86) compared to those without HF. HF respondents are, on average, 20 years older than those without HF, consistent with HF's prevalence in older adults. The likelihood of an HF diagnosis is similar for men and women but higher among non-Hispanic whites and blacks than Hispanics and other races. Those with HF are more likely to have health insurance. Adjusting for age, sex, race, and insurance, mean EQ-5D utility scores for individuals with and without HF are 0.785 (95% CI: 0.714-0.825) and 0.840 (95% CI: 0.827-0.851), respectively. Utility scores for HF patients remain significantly lower than those without HF up to 10 years post-diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HF reduces HRQoL by 6.55%, surpassing the clinically significant threshold of a 1-2% decrement. These findings highlight the potential of the HD Survey to inform public health monitoring and underscore the need for tailored interventions to address HRQoL deficits in HF populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12980,"journal":{"name":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","volume":"23 1","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12123777/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of life post heart failure diagnosis: population-level trends in the U.S.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Alva, Sarahfaye Dolman, Slaven Sikirica, Paul Kolm, Katherine Andrade, Zugui Zhang, William S Weintraub\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12955-025-02372-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with heart failure (HF) experience various symptoms making both diagnosis and disease burden estimates challenging. While HF-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are widely used, their focus on clinical cohorts limits their generalizability. Preference-based measures like the EQ-5D enable standardized health-related quality of life (HRQoL) comparisons across conditions, supporting resource allocation decisions. The CDC's Healthy Days (HD) Survey-a simple two-question tool that can be mapped to the EQ-5D-offers a broader approach to tracking HRQoL but remains underutilized in HF populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a nationally representative U.S. sample, we mapped HD Survey responses to EQ-5D utility scores to compare HRQoL between individuals with and without HF and examined changes in HRQoL over time. We assessed whether HD-derived scores align with HF-specific utility measures to support population-level health monitoring.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with HF report significantly more physically unhealthy days (8.46 vs. 3.42) and mentally unhealthy days (5.42 vs. 3.86) compared to those without HF. HF respondents are, on average, 20 years older than those without HF, consistent with HF's prevalence in older adults. The likelihood of an HF diagnosis is similar for men and women but higher among non-Hispanic whites and blacks than Hispanics and other races. Those with HF are more likely to have health insurance. Adjusting for age, sex, race, and insurance, mean EQ-5D utility scores for individuals with and without HF are 0.785 (95% CI: 0.714-0.825) and 0.840 (95% CI: 0.827-0.851), respectively. Utility scores for HF patients remain significantly lower than those without HF up to 10 years post-diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HF reduces HRQoL by 6.55%, surpassing the clinically significant threshold of a 1-2% decrement. These findings highlight the potential of the HD Survey to inform public health monitoring and underscore the need for tailored interventions to address HRQoL deficits in HF populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12123777/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-025-02372-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-025-02372-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:心力衰竭(HF)患者会出现各种症状,这使得诊断和疾病负担估计具有挑战性。虽然高频特异性患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)被广泛使用,但它们对临床队列的关注限制了它们的普遍性。像EQ-5D这样基于偏好的测量方法能够在不同条件下进行标准化的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)比较,从而支持资源分配决策。疾病预防控制中心的健康日(HD)调查——一个简单的两个问题的工具,可以映射到eq - 5d——提供了一个更广泛的方法来跟踪HRQoL,但在心衰人群中仍未得到充分利用。方法:使用具有全国代表性的美国样本,我们将HD调查反应与EQ-5D效用评分进行映射,以比较有HF和没有HF的个体的HRQoL,并检查HRQoL随时间的变化。我们评估了hd衍生评分是否与支持人群水平健康监测的hf特定效用措施相一致。结果:与无HF患者相比,HF患者报告的身体不健康天数(8.46 vs. 3.42)和精神不健康天数(5.42 vs. 3.86)显著增加。HF应答者的平均年龄比无HF应答者大20岁,这与HF在老年人中的患病率一致。HF诊断的可能性在男性和女性中相似,但在非西班牙裔白人和黑人中高于西班牙裔和其他种族。心衰患者更有可能拥有医疗保险。调整年龄、性别、种族和保险后,有和没有HF个体的EQ-5D效用平均得分分别为0.785 (95% CI: 0.714-0.825)和0.840 (95% CI: 0.827-0.851)。心衰患者的效用评分在诊断后10年内仍明显低于非心衰患者。结论:HF使HRQoL降低6.55%,超过了1-2%的临床意义阈值。这些发现突出了心衰调查为公共卫生监测提供信息的潜力,并强调需要采取针对性的干预措施来解决心衰人群的HRQoL不足问题。
Quality of life post heart failure diagnosis: population-level trends in the U.S.
Background: Individuals with heart failure (HF) experience various symptoms making both diagnosis and disease burden estimates challenging. While HF-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are widely used, their focus on clinical cohorts limits their generalizability. Preference-based measures like the EQ-5D enable standardized health-related quality of life (HRQoL) comparisons across conditions, supporting resource allocation decisions. The CDC's Healthy Days (HD) Survey-a simple two-question tool that can be mapped to the EQ-5D-offers a broader approach to tracking HRQoL but remains underutilized in HF populations.
Methods: Using a nationally representative U.S. sample, we mapped HD Survey responses to EQ-5D utility scores to compare HRQoL between individuals with and without HF and examined changes in HRQoL over time. We assessed whether HD-derived scores align with HF-specific utility measures to support population-level health monitoring.
Results: Individuals with HF report significantly more physically unhealthy days (8.46 vs. 3.42) and mentally unhealthy days (5.42 vs. 3.86) compared to those without HF. HF respondents are, on average, 20 years older than those without HF, consistent with HF's prevalence in older adults. The likelihood of an HF diagnosis is similar for men and women but higher among non-Hispanic whites and blacks than Hispanics and other races. Those with HF are more likely to have health insurance. Adjusting for age, sex, race, and insurance, mean EQ-5D utility scores for individuals with and without HF are 0.785 (95% CI: 0.714-0.825) and 0.840 (95% CI: 0.827-0.851), respectively. Utility scores for HF patients remain significantly lower than those without HF up to 10 years post-diagnosis.
Conclusion: HF reduces HRQoL by 6.55%, surpassing the clinically significant threshold of a 1-2% decrement. These findings highlight the potential of the HD Survey to inform public health monitoring and underscore the need for tailored interventions to address HRQoL deficits in HF populations.
期刊介绍:
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain.
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes considers original manuscripts on the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) assessment for evaluation of medical and psychosocial interventions. It also considers approaches and studies on psychometric properties of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures, including cultural validation of instruments if they provide information about the impact of interventions. The journal publishes study protocols and reviews summarising the present state of knowledge concerning a particular aspect of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures. Reviews should generally follow systematic review methodology. Comments on articles and letters to the editor are welcome.