Sera Lortye, Joanne P Will, Loes A Marquenie, Nick M Lommerse, Nathalie Faber, Anna E Goudriaan, Arnoud Arntz, Marleen M de Waal
{"title":"长时间暴露、眼动脱敏和再加工或图像重新书写治疗同时发生物质使用障碍患者创伤后应激障碍的有效性:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Sera Lortye, Joanne P Will, Loes A Marquenie, Nick M Lommerse, Nathalie Faber, Anna E Goudriaan, Arnoud Arntz, Marleen M de Waal","doi":"10.1111/add.70097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use disorder (SUD) are highly co-occurring and evidence for the optimal ways of treating PTSD in SUD patients is mixed. Our aim was to compare three different PTSD treatments, each added simultaneously to SUD treatment, with SUD treatment alone in patients with co-occurring SUD-PTSD. These PTSD treatments were: Prolonged Exposure (PE), Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) and Imagery Rescripting (ImRs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A single-blind 4-arm randomized controlled trial with follow-up at 3 months.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two addiction treatment centers in the Netherlands, providing intra- and extramural care.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>209 patients with SUD and co-morbid PTSD were included [mean age 37.5 (standard deviation, SD = 11.99), female sex = 46.4%, mean Clinically Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) score = 37.35 (SD = 9.28)].</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants were randomized to either simultaneous SUD + PE (n = 53), SUD + EMDR (n = 50), SUD + ImRs (n = 55) or to SUD treatment only (n = 51), with the active PTSD treatments consisting of 12 sessions each within 3 months. Standard protocols were used.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The primary outcome was clinician-administered PTSD symptom severity as measured by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (CAPS-5) at 3 month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included loss of PTSD diagnosis, full remission of PSTD and SUD-severity, also recorded at 3 months.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Compared with SUD only, the mean differences in CAPS-5 score were B = -5.41 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 10.88, 0.05, P = 0.052] for SUD + PE, B = -7.97 (95% CI = -13.57, -2.37, P = 0.006) for SUD + EMDR and B = -10.03 (95% CI = -15.29, -4.77, P < 0.001) for SUD + ImRs. When adjusted for baseline covariates, mean differences were B = -5.81 (95% CI = -11.48, -0.15, P = 0.044) for SUD + PE, B = -8.85 (95% CI = -14.60, -3.10, P = 0.003) for SUD + EMDR and B = -10.75 (95% CI = -15.94, -5.56, P = <0.001) for SUD + ImRs. No between-group differences in SUD outcomes were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among people with co-occurring substance use disorder (SUD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), trauma-focused PTSD treatment as add-on to SUD treatment appears to be effective in decreasing PTSD severity compared with manualized SUD only treatment and does not appear to increase SUD severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of treating post-traumatic stress disorder in patients with co-occurring substance use disorder with prolonged exposure, eye movement desensitization and reprocessing or imagery rescripting: A randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sera Lortye, Joanne P Will, Loes A Marquenie, Nick M Lommerse, Nathalie Faber, Anna E Goudriaan, Arnoud Arntz, Marleen M de Waal\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/add.70097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use disorder (SUD) are highly co-occurring and evidence for the optimal ways of treating PTSD in SUD patients is mixed. Our aim was to compare three different PTSD treatments, each added simultaneously to SUD treatment, with SUD treatment alone in patients with co-occurring SUD-PTSD. These PTSD treatments were: Prolonged Exposure (PE), Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) and Imagery Rescripting (ImRs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A single-blind 4-arm randomized controlled trial with follow-up at 3 months.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two addiction treatment centers in the Netherlands, providing intra- and extramural care.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>209 patients with SUD and co-morbid PTSD were included [mean age 37.5 (standard deviation, SD = 11.99), female sex = 46.4%, mean Clinically Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) score = 37.35 (SD = 9.28)].</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants were randomized to either simultaneous SUD + PE (n = 53), SUD + EMDR (n = 50), SUD + ImRs (n = 55) or to SUD treatment only (n = 51), with the active PTSD treatments consisting of 12 sessions each within 3 months. Standard protocols were used.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The primary outcome was clinician-administered PTSD symptom severity as measured by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (CAPS-5) at 3 month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included loss of PTSD diagnosis, full remission of PSTD and SUD-severity, also recorded at 3 months.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Compared with SUD only, the mean differences in CAPS-5 score were B = -5.41 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 10.88, 0.05, P = 0.052] for SUD + PE, B = -7.97 (95% CI = -13.57, -2.37, P = 0.006) for SUD + EMDR and B = -10.03 (95% CI = -15.29, -4.77, P < 0.001) for SUD + ImRs. When adjusted for baseline covariates, mean differences were B = -5.81 (95% CI = -11.48, -0.15, P = 0.044) for SUD + PE, B = -8.85 (95% CI = -14.60, -3.10, P = 0.003) for SUD + EMDR and B = -10.75 (95% CI = -15.94, -5.56, P = <0.001) for SUD + ImRs. No between-group differences in SUD outcomes were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among people with co-occurring substance use disorder (SUD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), trauma-focused PTSD treatment as add-on to SUD treatment appears to be effective in decreasing PTSD severity compared with manualized SUD only treatment and does not appear to increase SUD severity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addiction\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addiction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70097\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70097","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和物质使用障碍(SUD)是高度共存的,治疗PTSD在SUD患者中的最佳方法的证据是混合的。我们的目的是比较三种不同的PTSD治疗方法,每种治疗方法同时添加SUD治疗,与合并SUD-PTSD患者单独使用SUD治疗。这些创伤后应激障碍治疗包括:长时间暴露(PE)、眼动脱敏和再处理(EMDR)和图像改写(ImRs)。设计:单盲4组随机对照试验,随访3个月。设置:两个成瘾治疗中心在荷兰,提供内部和外部护理。研究对象:209例合并PTSD合并SUD患者[平均年龄37.5(标准差,SD = 11.99),女性= 46.4%,临床给药PTSD量表(CAPS)平均得分= 37.35 (SD = 9.28)]。干预措施:参与者被随机分为同时接受SUD + PE (n = 53)、SUD + EMDR (n = 50)、SUD + ImRs (n = 55)或仅接受SUD治疗(n = 51),其中积极的PTSD治疗在3个月内包括12次治疗。采用标准方案。测量:主要结果是临床给药的PTSD症状严重程度,通过精神障碍诊断与统计手册第五版(CAPS-5)在3个月的随访中测量。次要结局包括PTSD诊断丧失、PTSD完全缓解和sud严重程度,也在3个月时记录。结果:与单纯SUD相比,SUD + PE组CAPS-5评分的平均差异为B = -5.41[95%可信区间(CI) = 10.88, 0.05, P = 0.052], SUD + EMDR组cap -5评分的平均差异为B = -7.97 (95% CI = -13.57, -2.37, P = 0.006),而SUD + EMDR组cap -5评分的平均差异为B = -10.03 (95% CI = -15.29, -4.77, P)。在同时患有物质使用障碍(SUD)和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的人群中,创伤为重点的PTSD治疗作为SUD治疗的附加治疗,与单独的SUD治疗相比,似乎有效地降低了PTSD的严重程度,并且似乎没有增加SUD的严重程度。
Effectiveness of treating post-traumatic stress disorder in patients with co-occurring substance use disorder with prolonged exposure, eye movement desensitization and reprocessing or imagery rescripting: A randomized controlled trial.
Background and aims: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use disorder (SUD) are highly co-occurring and evidence for the optimal ways of treating PTSD in SUD patients is mixed. Our aim was to compare three different PTSD treatments, each added simultaneously to SUD treatment, with SUD treatment alone in patients with co-occurring SUD-PTSD. These PTSD treatments were: Prolonged Exposure (PE), Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) and Imagery Rescripting (ImRs).
Design: A single-blind 4-arm randomized controlled trial with follow-up at 3 months.
Setting: Two addiction treatment centers in the Netherlands, providing intra- and extramural care.
Participants: 209 patients with SUD and co-morbid PTSD were included [mean age 37.5 (standard deviation, SD = 11.99), female sex = 46.4%, mean Clinically Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) score = 37.35 (SD = 9.28)].
Interventions: Participants were randomized to either simultaneous SUD + PE (n = 53), SUD + EMDR (n = 50), SUD + ImRs (n = 55) or to SUD treatment only (n = 51), with the active PTSD treatments consisting of 12 sessions each within 3 months. Standard protocols were used.
Measurements: The primary outcome was clinician-administered PTSD symptom severity as measured by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (CAPS-5) at 3 month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included loss of PTSD diagnosis, full remission of PSTD and SUD-severity, also recorded at 3 months.
Findings: Compared with SUD only, the mean differences in CAPS-5 score were B = -5.41 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 10.88, 0.05, P = 0.052] for SUD + PE, B = -7.97 (95% CI = -13.57, -2.37, P = 0.006) for SUD + EMDR and B = -10.03 (95% CI = -15.29, -4.77, P < 0.001) for SUD + ImRs. When adjusted for baseline covariates, mean differences were B = -5.81 (95% CI = -11.48, -0.15, P = 0.044) for SUD + PE, B = -8.85 (95% CI = -14.60, -3.10, P = 0.003) for SUD + EMDR and B = -10.75 (95% CI = -15.94, -5.56, P = <0.001) for SUD + ImRs. No between-group differences in SUD outcomes were found.
Conclusions: Among people with co-occurring substance use disorder (SUD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), trauma-focused PTSD treatment as add-on to SUD treatment appears to be effective in decreasing PTSD severity compared with manualized SUD only treatment and does not appear to increase SUD severity.
期刊介绍:
Addiction publishes peer-reviewed research reports on pharmacological and behavioural addictions, bringing together research conducted within many different disciplines.
Its goal is to serve international and interdisciplinary scientific and clinical communication, to strengthen links between science and policy, and to stimulate and enhance the quality of debate. We seek submissions that are not only technically competent but are also original and contain information or ideas of fresh interest to our international readership. We seek to serve low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries as well as more economically developed countries.
Addiction’s scope spans human experimental, epidemiological, social science, historical, clinical and policy research relating to addiction, primarily but not exclusively in the areas of psychoactive substance use and/or gambling. In addition to original research, the journal features editorials, commentaries, reviews, letters, and book reviews.