气动雾化ICP-MS单颗粒和单细胞分析:样品导入系统的比较。

IF 6.1 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Talanta Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-22 DOI:10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128372
Andrés Suárez Priede, Mario Corte-Rodríguez, Hannes Gödde, María Montes Bayón, Jörg Bettmer
{"title":"气动雾化ICP-MS单颗粒和单细胞分析:样品导入系统的比较。","authors":"Andrés Suárez Priede, Mario Corte-Rodríguez, Hannes Gödde, María Montes Bayón, Jörg Bettmer","doi":"10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) operated in the single particle (sp) and singe cell (sc) modes belongs to the methods of elemental analysis that has significantly grown during the last years. Its contribution to the characterisation of nanomaterials and cell populations has opened new avenues and possibilities in many different disciplines. In this context, pneumatic nebulisation plays a pivotal role since it is still the preferable sample introduction system in ICP-MS. Reliable quantitative data are only accessible with known transport efficiency (TE) of the small objects, so that the determination of this parameter is extremely critical. In this study, we investigated various combinations of commercially available nebulizers and spray chambers for testing their performance in sp- and sc-ICP-MS. Two configurations made use of high sample flow rates of 0.4 mL/min with a \"traditional\" cyclonic spray chamber, and another four combinations employed spray chambers especially designed for total consumption used at optimum flow rates of 10 μL/min (Cytospray and HE-SIS). Achievable sensitivities were significantly better for the high consumption set-ups (about 5-fold). Transport efficiencies determined by the particle number method were evaluated by the use of three different model suspensions: i) 30 nm standard gold nanoparticles LGCQC5050, ii) europium-loaded polystyrene beads, and iii) selenized yeast SELM-1. Significant differences between the three suspensions were observed obtaining results up to 90 % for certain configurations. In fact, these differences imply that for different approaches (sp- or sc-ICP-MS) a suitable calibrant has to be used for the accurate determination of the transport efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":435,"journal":{"name":"Talanta","volume":"295 ","pages":"128372"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single particle and single cell analysis by ICP-MS with pneumatic nebulisation: Comparing sample introduction systems.\",\"authors\":\"Andrés Suárez Priede, Mario Corte-Rodríguez, Hannes Gödde, María Montes Bayón, Jörg Bettmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) operated in the single particle (sp) and singe cell (sc) modes belongs to the methods of elemental analysis that has significantly grown during the last years. Its contribution to the characterisation of nanomaterials and cell populations has opened new avenues and possibilities in many different disciplines. In this context, pneumatic nebulisation plays a pivotal role since it is still the preferable sample introduction system in ICP-MS. Reliable quantitative data are only accessible with known transport efficiency (TE) of the small objects, so that the determination of this parameter is extremely critical. In this study, we investigated various combinations of commercially available nebulizers and spray chambers for testing their performance in sp- and sc-ICP-MS. Two configurations made use of high sample flow rates of 0.4 mL/min with a \\\"traditional\\\" cyclonic spray chamber, and another four combinations employed spray chambers especially designed for total consumption used at optimum flow rates of 10 μL/min (Cytospray and HE-SIS). Achievable sensitivities were significantly better for the high consumption set-ups (about 5-fold). Transport efficiencies determined by the particle number method were evaluated by the use of three different model suspensions: i) 30 nm standard gold nanoparticles LGCQC5050, ii) europium-loaded polystyrene beads, and iii) selenized yeast SELM-1. Significant differences between the three suspensions were observed obtaining results up to 90 % for certain configurations. In fact, these differences imply that for different approaches (sp- or sc-ICP-MS) a suitable calibrant has to be used for the accurate determination of the transport efficiency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Talanta\",\"volume\":\"295 \",\"pages\":\"128372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Talanta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128372\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Talanta","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128372","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在单粒子(sp)和单细胞(sc)模式下工作的电感耦合等离子体质谱(ICP-MS)属于近年来显著增长的元素分析方法。它对纳米材料和细胞群表征的贡献为许多不同学科开辟了新的途径和可能性。在这种情况下,气动雾化起着关键作用,因为它仍然是ICP-MS中优选的样品导入系统。只有已知小物体的传输效率(TE)才能获得可靠的定量数据,因此该参数的确定至关重要。在这项研究中,我们研究了市售雾化器和喷雾室的各种组合,以测试它们在sp-和sc-ICP-MS中的性能。两种配置使用“传统”旋风喷雾室的高样品流量为0.4 mL/min,另外四种组合使用专门设计的喷雾室,用于总消耗,最佳流量为10 μL/min (Cytospray和HE-SIS)。对于高消耗设置(约5倍),可实现的灵敏度明显更好。通过使用三种不同的模型悬浮液来评估颗粒数法确定的传输效率:i) 30 nm标准金纳米颗粒LGCQC5050, ii)载铕聚苯乙烯珠,iii)硒化酵母SELM-1。观察到三种悬浮液之间的显着差异,在某些配置中获得高达90%的结果。事实上,这些差异意味着对于不同的方法(sp-或sc-ICP-MS),必须使用合适的校准剂来准确测定传输效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single particle and single cell analysis by ICP-MS with pneumatic nebulisation: Comparing sample introduction systems.

Inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) operated in the single particle (sp) and singe cell (sc) modes belongs to the methods of elemental analysis that has significantly grown during the last years. Its contribution to the characterisation of nanomaterials and cell populations has opened new avenues and possibilities in many different disciplines. In this context, pneumatic nebulisation plays a pivotal role since it is still the preferable sample introduction system in ICP-MS. Reliable quantitative data are only accessible with known transport efficiency (TE) of the small objects, so that the determination of this parameter is extremely critical. In this study, we investigated various combinations of commercially available nebulizers and spray chambers for testing their performance in sp- and sc-ICP-MS. Two configurations made use of high sample flow rates of 0.4 mL/min with a "traditional" cyclonic spray chamber, and another four combinations employed spray chambers especially designed for total consumption used at optimum flow rates of 10 μL/min (Cytospray and HE-SIS). Achievable sensitivities were significantly better for the high consumption set-ups (about 5-fold). Transport efficiencies determined by the particle number method were evaluated by the use of three different model suspensions: i) 30 nm standard gold nanoparticles LGCQC5050, ii) europium-loaded polystyrene beads, and iii) selenized yeast SELM-1. Significant differences between the three suspensions were observed obtaining results up to 90 % for certain configurations. In fact, these differences imply that for different approaches (sp- or sc-ICP-MS) a suitable calibrant has to be used for the accurate determination of the transport efficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Talanta
Talanta 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
4.90%
发文量
861
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Talanta provides a forum for the publication of original research papers, short communications, and critical reviews in all branches of pure and applied analytical chemistry. Papers are evaluated based on established guidelines, including the fundamental nature of the study, scientific novelty, substantial improvement or advantage over existing technology or methods, and demonstrated analytical applicability. Original research papers on fundamental studies, and on novel sensor and instrumentation developments, are encouraged. Novel or improved applications in areas such as clinical and biological chemistry, environmental analysis, geochemistry, materials science and engineering, and analytical platforms for omics development are welcome. Analytical performance of methods should be determined, including interference and matrix effects, and methods should be validated by comparison with a standard method, or analysis of a certified reference material. Simple spiking recoveries may not be sufficient. The developed method should especially comprise information on selectivity, sensitivity, detection limits, accuracy, and reliability. However, applying official validation or robustness studies to a routine method or technique does not necessarily constitute novelty. Proper statistical treatment of the data should be provided. Relevant literature should be cited, including related publications by the authors, and authors should discuss how their proposed methodology compares with previously reported methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信