土壤深度:高山生态系统生产力的不同驱动因素

IF 6.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Shanshan Qi, Gangsheng Wang, Wanyu Li, Daifeng Xiang, Shuhao Zhou, Zehao Lv
{"title":"土壤深度:高山生态系统生产力的不同驱动因素","authors":"Shanshan Qi,&nbsp;Gangsheng Wang,&nbsp;Wanyu Li,&nbsp;Daifeng Xiang,&nbsp;Shuhao Zhou,&nbsp;Zehao Lv","doi":"10.1111/geb.70071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Deep soils (&gt; 30 cm) store considerable amounts of carbon and are often assumed to be less responsive to warming than topsoil. However, recent evidence indicates that deep soils are more sensitive to climate change in alpine grasslands, yet their influence on ecosystem productivity is not well understood. Here, we tested the key environmental drivers, particularly the roles of deep soil moisture and temperature, of alpine ecosystem productivity across different vegetation types and plant growth constraints.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>The Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP), the Earth's Third Pole.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>2003–2021.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>Sedge, grass and forbs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We introduced the plant growth limitation index (GLI) to classify alpine sites as either energy- or water-limited sites, using solar radiation and soil moisture as proxies for energy and water availability. We employed the random forest models to quantify dominant environmental drivers of gross primary productivity (GPP) and net ecosystem productivity (NEP) at 14 alpine sites across four vegetation types (alpine meadow, steppe, wetland and shrub) on the QTP.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We identified divergent drivers of ecosystem productivity varying with soil depth and GLI classifications. In water-limited sites, productivity was more responsive to soil variables than to radiation, with deep soil temperature and moisture exerting greater influence than their surface counterparts. In contrast, energy-limited sites were primarily driven by topsoil temperature and radiation, with deep soil moisture remaining more influential than topsoil moisture. In alpine wetlands, deep soil temperature emerged as the dominant driver.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We advance the concept of plant growth constraints by introducing deep soil moisture as a key regulator, demonstrating its direct controls on alpine vegetation productivity. Our findings challenge previous studies that focused solely on topsoil, offering new insights into the interactions between productivity and environmental drivers in alpine ecosystems. This improved understanding supports more accurate projections of carbon sequestration under global change.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"34 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soil Depth Matters: Divergent Drivers of Ecosystem Productivity in Alpine Ecosystems\",\"authors\":\"Shanshan Qi,&nbsp;Gangsheng Wang,&nbsp;Wanyu Li,&nbsp;Daifeng Xiang,&nbsp;Shuhao Zhou,&nbsp;Zehao Lv\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/geb.70071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Deep soils (&gt; 30 cm) store considerable amounts of carbon and are often assumed to be less responsive to warming than topsoil. However, recent evidence indicates that deep soils are more sensitive to climate change in alpine grasslands, yet their influence on ecosystem productivity is not well understood. Here, we tested the key environmental drivers, particularly the roles of deep soil moisture and temperature, of alpine ecosystem productivity across different vegetation types and plant growth constraints.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP), the Earth's Third Pole.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Time Period</h3>\\n \\n <p>2003–2021.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\\n \\n <p>Sedge, grass and forbs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We introduced the plant growth limitation index (GLI) to classify alpine sites as either energy- or water-limited sites, using solar radiation and soil moisture as proxies for energy and water availability. We employed the random forest models to quantify dominant environmental drivers of gross primary productivity (GPP) and net ecosystem productivity (NEP) at 14 alpine sites across four vegetation types (alpine meadow, steppe, wetland and shrub) on the QTP.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We identified divergent drivers of ecosystem productivity varying with soil depth and GLI classifications. In water-limited sites, productivity was more responsive to soil variables than to radiation, with deep soil temperature and moisture exerting greater influence than their surface counterparts. In contrast, energy-limited sites were primarily driven by topsoil temperature and radiation, with deep soil moisture remaining more influential than topsoil moisture. In alpine wetlands, deep soil temperature emerged as the dominant driver.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>We advance the concept of plant growth constraints by introducing deep soil moisture as a key regulator, demonstrating its direct controls on alpine vegetation productivity. Our findings challenge previous studies that focused solely on topsoil, offering new insights into the interactions between productivity and environmental drivers in alpine ecosystems. This improved understanding supports more accurate projections of carbon sequestration under global change.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"volume\":\"34 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Ecology and Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70071\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70071","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:深层土壤(30厘米)储存了大量的碳,通常被认为比表层土壤对变暖的反应要小。然而,最近的证据表明,高寒草原深层土壤对气候变化更为敏感,但其对生态系统生产力的影响尚不清楚。在此,我们测试了不同植被类型和植物生长限制下高寒生态系统生产力的关键环境驱动因素,特别是深层土壤湿度和温度的作用。地理位置:青藏高原,地球的第三极。时间范围2003-2021年。主要分类群研究莎草、禾本科及草本植物。方法采用植物生长限制指数(GLI),利用太阳辐射和土壤湿度作为能量和水分可用性指标,对高寒地区的能量和水分可用性进行分类。采用随机森林模型,对青藏高原4种植被类型(高寒草甸、草原、湿地和灌丛)的14个高寒样地的总初级生产力(GPP)和净生态系统生产力(NEP)的主导环境驱动因子进行了量化。结果生态系统生产力的驱动因素随土壤深度和GLI分类的不同而不同。在水分有限的地点,生产力对土壤变量的响应大于辐射,深层土壤温度和湿度的影响大于表层土壤温度和湿度的影响。相比之下,能量有限的场地主要受表土温度和辐射驱动,深层土壤湿度的影响仍然大于表土湿度。在高寒湿地中,深层土壤温度成为主要驱动因素。我们提出了植物生长约束的概念,引入了深层土壤水分作为一个关键的调节因子,证明了它对高寒植被生产力的直接控制。我们的发现挑战了以往仅关注表土的研究,为高山生态系统中生产力和环境驱动因素之间的相互作用提供了新的见解。这一改进的认识有助于更准确地预测全球变化下的碳固存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Soil Depth Matters: Divergent Drivers of Ecosystem Productivity in Alpine Ecosystems

Aim

Deep soils (> 30 cm) store considerable amounts of carbon and are often assumed to be less responsive to warming than topsoil. However, recent evidence indicates that deep soils are more sensitive to climate change in alpine grasslands, yet their influence on ecosystem productivity is not well understood. Here, we tested the key environmental drivers, particularly the roles of deep soil moisture and temperature, of alpine ecosystem productivity across different vegetation types and plant growth constraints.

Location

The Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP), the Earth's Third Pole.

Time Period

2003–2021.

Major Taxa Studied

Sedge, grass and forbs.

Methods

We introduced the plant growth limitation index (GLI) to classify alpine sites as either energy- or water-limited sites, using solar radiation and soil moisture as proxies for energy and water availability. We employed the random forest models to quantify dominant environmental drivers of gross primary productivity (GPP) and net ecosystem productivity (NEP) at 14 alpine sites across four vegetation types (alpine meadow, steppe, wetland and shrub) on the QTP.

Results

We identified divergent drivers of ecosystem productivity varying with soil depth and GLI classifications. In water-limited sites, productivity was more responsive to soil variables than to radiation, with deep soil temperature and moisture exerting greater influence than their surface counterparts. In contrast, energy-limited sites were primarily driven by topsoil temperature and radiation, with deep soil moisture remaining more influential than topsoil moisture. In alpine wetlands, deep soil temperature emerged as the dominant driver.

Main Conclusions

We advance the concept of plant growth constraints by introducing deep soil moisture as a key regulator, demonstrating its direct controls on alpine vegetation productivity. Our findings challenge previous studies that focused solely on topsoil, offering new insights into the interactions between productivity and environmental drivers in alpine ecosystems. This improved understanding supports more accurate projections of carbon sequestration under global change.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Global Ecology and Biogeography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信