基于个性化差异隐私指数机制的社会关系隐私保护

IF 4.5 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS
Jiawei Shen;Junfeng Tian;Ziyuan Wang;Qi Zhu
{"title":"基于个性化差异隐私指数机制的社会关系隐私保护","authors":"Jiawei Shen;Junfeng Tian;Ziyuan Wang;Qi Zhu","doi":"10.1109/TCSS.2024.3508744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Presently, the majority of social networking platforms tend to outsource the analysis of social relationship data to third-party companies. Existing methods, which generally aim to protect social relationships by erasing friendship links or introducing uniform noise into datasets, do not take into account the risk of inference attacks or the actual privacy needs of users. To address these concerns, we present a novel method, named exponential mechanism of personalized difference privacy (EPDP), for preserving the privacy of social relationships, based on the EPDP. We develop specific social relationship indices to group friendship links and divided these links into distinct privacy levels, each with a unique privacy budget. Then, we select representative elements from each group using sampling and the exponential mechanism to generalize the original datasets, ensuring compliance with personalized difference privacy principles. Metrics for privacy and utility assessment are devised to evaluate method performance. Experimental results reveal that EPDP offers superior utility compared to uniform differential privacy (UDP) and provides better privacy protection than the state-of-the-art. Moreover, we explore the impact of various parameters on data utility. This article marks the pioneering effort to introduce a privacy-preserving method based on the exponential mechanism for the safeguarding of social relationships.","PeriodicalId":13044,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems","volume":"12 3","pages":"1164-1180"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preserving Social Relationship Privacy via the Exponential Mechanism of Personalized Differential Privacy\",\"authors\":\"Jiawei Shen;Junfeng Tian;Ziyuan Wang;Qi Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TCSS.2024.3508744\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Presently, the majority of social networking platforms tend to outsource the analysis of social relationship data to third-party companies. Existing methods, which generally aim to protect social relationships by erasing friendship links or introducing uniform noise into datasets, do not take into account the risk of inference attacks or the actual privacy needs of users. To address these concerns, we present a novel method, named exponential mechanism of personalized difference privacy (EPDP), for preserving the privacy of social relationships, based on the EPDP. We develop specific social relationship indices to group friendship links and divided these links into distinct privacy levels, each with a unique privacy budget. Then, we select representative elements from each group using sampling and the exponential mechanism to generalize the original datasets, ensuring compliance with personalized difference privacy principles. Metrics for privacy and utility assessment are devised to evaluate method performance. Experimental results reveal that EPDP offers superior utility compared to uniform differential privacy (UDP) and provides better privacy protection than the state-of-the-art. Moreover, we explore the impact of various parameters on data utility. This article marks the pioneering effort to introduce a privacy-preserving method based on the exponential mechanism for the safeguarding of social relationships.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"1164-1180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10789188/\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10789188/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,大多数社交网络平台倾向于将社交关系数据的分析外包给第三方公司。现有的方法通常旨在通过消除友谊链接或在数据集中引入均匀噪声来保护社会关系,但没有考虑到推理攻击的风险或用户的实际隐私需求。为了解决这些问题,我们提出了一种基于个性化差异隐私指数机制(EPDP)的社会关系隐私保护方法。我们开发了特定的社会关系指数来对友谊链接进行分组,并将这些链接划分为不同的隐私级别,每个级别都有独特的隐私预算。然后,我们利用抽样和指数机制从每组中选择具有代表性的元素,对原始数据集进行泛化,确保符合个性化差异隐私原则。设计了隐私和效用评估的度量来评估方法的性能。实验结果表明,与统一差分隐私(UDP)相比,EPDP提供了优越的实用性,并提供了比最先进的隐私保护。此外,我们还探讨了各种参数对数据效用的影响。本文开创性地引入了一种基于指数机制的隐私保护方法来保护社会关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preserving Social Relationship Privacy via the Exponential Mechanism of Personalized Differential Privacy
Presently, the majority of social networking platforms tend to outsource the analysis of social relationship data to third-party companies. Existing methods, which generally aim to protect social relationships by erasing friendship links or introducing uniform noise into datasets, do not take into account the risk of inference attacks or the actual privacy needs of users. To address these concerns, we present a novel method, named exponential mechanism of personalized difference privacy (EPDP), for preserving the privacy of social relationships, based on the EPDP. We develop specific social relationship indices to group friendship links and divided these links into distinct privacy levels, each with a unique privacy budget. Then, we select representative elements from each group using sampling and the exponential mechanism to generalize the original datasets, ensuring compliance with personalized difference privacy principles. Metrics for privacy and utility assessment are devised to evaluate method performance. Experimental results reveal that EPDP offers superior utility compared to uniform differential privacy (UDP) and provides better privacy protection than the state-of-the-art. Moreover, we explore the impact of various parameters on data utility. This article marks the pioneering effort to introduce a privacy-preserving method based on the exponential mechanism for the safeguarding of social relationships.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems
IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
316
期刊介绍: IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems focuses on such topics as modeling, simulation, analysis and understanding of social systems from the quantitative and/or computational perspective. "Systems" include man-man, man-machine and machine-machine organizations and adversarial situations as well as social media structures and their dynamics. More specifically, the proposed transactions publishes articles on modeling the dynamics of social systems, methodologies for incorporating and representing socio-cultural and behavioral aspects in computational modeling, analysis of social system behavior and structure, and paradigms for social systems modeling and simulation. The journal also features articles on social network dynamics, social intelligence and cognition, social systems design and architectures, socio-cultural modeling and representation, and computational behavior modeling, and their applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信