限制参与结核病疫苗试验的干扰素释放试验阳性受试者的样本量效率

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Frank Cobelens , Puck T. Pelzer , Gavin J. Churchyard , Alberto Garcia-Basteiro , Mark Hatherill , Philip C. Hill , Leonardo Martinez , Richard G. White
{"title":"限制参与结核病疫苗试验的干扰素释放试验阳性受试者的样本量效率","authors":"Frank Cobelens ,&nbsp;Puck T. Pelzer ,&nbsp;Gavin J. Churchyard ,&nbsp;Alberto Garcia-Basteiro ,&nbsp;Mark Hatherill ,&nbsp;Philip C. Hill ,&nbsp;Leonardo Martinez ,&nbsp;Richard G. White","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>A common approach to reducing sample sizes for late-stage tuberculosis vaccine trials is to restrict enrolment to interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA)-positive participants to maximize tuberculosis case accrual. The efficiency gain, if any, from this screening strategy is unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We estimated the age specific IGRA positivity prevalence for transmission levels generally considered in tuberculosis vaccine trials (annual risk of tuberculosis infection [ARTI] 2–6 %) and calculated the expected tuberculosis incidence at each age by IGRA status, using a difference equation model. We modelled scenarios that assumed constant or increasing ARTI during adolescence and differing levels of partial protection afforded by previous <em>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</em> infection. We then estimated sample size requirements for tuberculosis vaccine trials enrolling only IGRA-positive participants or participants without prior IGRA testing (‘Mixed’ trial). We assumed participants were 15–44 years at enrolment and followed-up for 3 years.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Estimated tuberculosis incidence was 4.7 times higher in IGRA-positive compared to IGRA-negative participants at age 15 years, but 0.9 times lower at age 44 years (assuming ARTI 4 %). This age-cohort effect was exacerbated when assuming partial protection and attenuated when assuming increasing ARTI during adolescence. In a model that included both these assumptions, the sample size required for a Mixed trial compared to that for an IGRA-positive participants-only trial was 124 % larger at 2 % ARTI, 36 % larger at 4 % ARTI but only 8 % larger at 6 % ARTI. Prioritizing enrolment of participants aged 15–29 years improved sample size efficiency for an IGRA-positive participants-only trial. These results were largely unaffected by our model assumptions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In late-stage tuberculosis vaccine trials among adults and adolescents, pre-enrolment screening by IGRA testing provides a large sample size efficiency when <em>M. tuberculosis</em> transmission levels are relatively low, but modest or no sample size benefits at high transmission levels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 127301"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sample size efficiency of restricting participation in tuberculosis vaccine trials to interferon-gamma release assay-positive participants\",\"authors\":\"Frank Cobelens ,&nbsp;Puck T. Pelzer ,&nbsp;Gavin J. Churchyard ,&nbsp;Alberto Garcia-Basteiro ,&nbsp;Mark Hatherill ,&nbsp;Philip C. Hill ,&nbsp;Leonardo Martinez ,&nbsp;Richard G. White\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>A common approach to reducing sample sizes for late-stage tuberculosis vaccine trials is to restrict enrolment to interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA)-positive participants to maximize tuberculosis case accrual. The efficiency gain, if any, from this screening strategy is unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We estimated the age specific IGRA positivity prevalence for transmission levels generally considered in tuberculosis vaccine trials (annual risk of tuberculosis infection [ARTI] 2–6 %) and calculated the expected tuberculosis incidence at each age by IGRA status, using a difference equation model. We modelled scenarios that assumed constant or increasing ARTI during adolescence and differing levels of partial protection afforded by previous <em>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</em> infection. We then estimated sample size requirements for tuberculosis vaccine trials enrolling only IGRA-positive participants or participants without prior IGRA testing (‘Mixed’ trial). We assumed participants were 15–44 years at enrolment and followed-up for 3 years.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Estimated tuberculosis incidence was 4.7 times higher in IGRA-positive compared to IGRA-negative participants at age 15 years, but 0.9 times lower at age 44 years (assuming ARTI 4 %). This age-cohort effect was exacerbated when assuming partial protection and attenuated when assuming increasing ARTI during adolescence. In a model that included both these assumptions, the sample size required for a Mixed trial compared to that for an IGRA-positive participants-only trial was 124 % larger at 2 % ARTI, 36 % larger at 4 % ARTI but only 8 % larger at 6 % ARTI. Prioritizing enrolment of participants aged 15–29 years improved sample size efficiency for an IGRA-positive participants-only trial. These results were largely unaffected by our model assumptions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In late-stage tuberculosis vaccine trials among adults and adolescents, pre-enrolment screening by IGRA testing provides a large sample size efficiency when <em>M. tuberculosis</em> transmission levels are relatively low, but modest or no sample size benefits at high transmission levels.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vaccine\",\"volume\":\"61 \",\"pages\":\"Article 127301\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vaccine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X25005985\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X25005985","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:减少晚期结核病疫苗试验样本量的一种常用方法是将入组限制在干扰素- γ释放试验(IGRA)阳性的参与者中,以最大限度地增加结核病病例。这种筛选策略的效率增益(如果有的话)是未知的。方法采用差分方程模型估计结核疫苗试验中通常考虑的IGRA传播水平的年龄特异性阳性流行率(结核感染的年风险[ARTI] 2 - 6%),并根据IGRA状态计算每个年龄的预期结核病发病率。我们模拟了假设青少年时期ARTI持续或增加以及先前结核分枝杆菌感染提供的不同程度的部分保护的情景。然后,我们估计了仅纳入IGRA阳性受试者或未事先进行IGRA检测的受试者(“混合”试验)的结核病疫苗试验的样本量要求。我们假设参与者入组时年龄为15-44岁,随访3年。结果在15岁时,igra阳性受试者的估计结核病发病率是igra阴性受试者的4.7倍,而在44岁时(假设ARTI为4%),估计结核病发病率是igra阴性受试者的0.9倍。当假设部分保护时,这种年龄队列效应加剧,当假设青春期ARTI增加时,这种效应减弱。在包含这两种假设的模型中,混合试验所需的样本量与仅igra阳性参与者的试验相比,在2% ARTI时增加124%,在4% ARTI时增加36%,而在6% ARTI时仅增加8%。优先招募年龄在15-29岁的参与者提高了igra阳性受试者试验的样本量效率。这些结果在很大程度上不受我们模型假设的影响。结论在成人和青少年的晚期结核病疫苗试验中,IGRA检测的入组前筛查在结核分枝杆菌传播水平相对较低时提供了大样本量的效率,但在高传播水平时,样本量的效益有限或没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sample size efficiency of restricting participation in tuberculosis vaccine trials to interferon-gamma release assay-positive participants

Background

A common approach to reducing sample sizes for late-stage tuberculosis vaccine trials is to restrict enrolment to interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA)-positive participants to maximize tuberculosis case accrual. The efficiency gain, if any, from this screening strategy is unknown.

Methods

We estimated the age specific IGRA positivity prevalence for transmission levels generally considered in tuberculosis vaccine trials (annual risk of tuberculosis infection [ARTI] 2–6 %) and calculated the expected tuberculosis incidence at each age by IGRA status, using a difference equation model. We modelled scenarios that assumed constant or increasing ARTI during adolescence and differing levels of partial protection afforded by previous Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. We then estimated sample size requirements for tuberculosis vaccine trials enrolling only IGRA-positive participants or participants without prior IGRA testing (‘Mixed’ trial). We assumed participants were 15–44 years at enrolment and followed-up for 3 years.

Results

Estimated tuberculosis incidence was 4.7 times higher in IGRA-positive compared to IGRA-negative participants at age 15 years, but 0.9 times lower at age 44 years (assuming ARTI 4 %). This age-cohort effect was exacerbated when assuming partial protection and attenuated when assuming increasing ARTI during adolescence. In a model that included both these assumptions, the sample size required for a Mixed trial compared to that for an IGRA-positive participants-only trial was 124 % larger at 2 % ARTI, 36 % larger at 4 % ARTI but only 8 % larger at 6 % ARTI. Prioritizing enrolment of participants aged 15–29 years improved sample size efficiency for an IGRA-positive participants-only trial. These results were largely unaffected by our model assumptions.

Conclusion

In late-stage tuberculosis vaccine trials among adults and adolescents, pre-enrolment screening by IGRA testing provides a large sample size efficiency when M. tuberculosis transmission levels are relatively low, but modest or no sample size benefits at high transmission levels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信