“对不起,我不能牺牲我的生活质量”:英国的特权阶层几乎不愿意改变高碳生活方式

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Sophie Duncan , Annika Hjelmskog , Esther K. Papies
{"title":"“对不起,我不能牺牲我的生活质量”:英国的特权阶层几乎不愿意改变高碳生活方式","authors":"Sophie Duncan ,&nbsp;Annika Hjelmskog ,&nbsp;Esther K. Papies","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Changing high‑carbon lifestyles of individuals with high socioeconomic status (SES) is an important step toward reducing greenhouse gas emissions and ensuring social justice within climate change mitigation. However, shifting high‑carbon lifestyles may present a challenge, especially when many high‑carbon behaviours (such as frequent flying and car ownership) are used to signal status within individuals' social networks. Here, we report the findings of a pre-registered online mixed-methods study in the UK (<em>N</em> = 511) that examined the associations of descriptive norms about high‑carbon behaviours with policy support and with the likelihood to voluntarily reduce these behaviours for climate change mitigation. Contrary to our hypotheses, we found no meaningful association of descriptive norms with increased policy support, nor with decreased likelihood of voluntarily shifting behaviour. Participants showed moderate reluctance toward changing high‑carbon behaviours through voluntary or policy action but showed a slight preference for voluntary action that ran contrary to our initial predictions. This was mirrored within thematic analysis of our open-ended questions that revealed two main themes: (1) The desire for personal choice, which includes the option of not changing one's behaviour, and (2) High‑carbon lifestyles increase happiness. Overall, our findings suggest that individuals with high SES are unlikely to reduce lifestyle-related emissions, or support policy to this effect, when it requires them to make direct changes to high‑carbon behaviours. To change high‑carbon lifestyles of individuals with high SES, citizens should be supported in envisioning and creating pathways for sufficiency-focused lower-carbon lifestyles that can be desirable <em>and</em> fulfilling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 104114"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“I can't compromise the quality of my life I'm sorry”: Privileged individuals in the United Kingdom show little willingness to change high-carbon lifestyles\",\"authors\":\"Sophie Duncan ,&nbsp;Annika Hjelmskog ,&nbsp;Esther K. Papies\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Changing high‑carbon lifestyles of individuals with high socioeconomic status (SES) is an important step toward reducing greenhouse gas emissions and ensuring social justice within climate change mitigation. However, shifting high‑carbon lifestyles may present a challenge, especially when many high‑carbon behaviours (such as frequent flying and car ownership) are used to signal status within individuals' social networks. Here, we report the findings of a pre-registered online mixed-methods study in the UK (<em>N</em> = 511) that examined the associations of descriptive norms about high‑carbon behaviours with policy support and with the likelihood to voluntarily reduce these behaviours for climate change mitigation. Contrary to our hypotheses, we found no meaningful association of descriptive norms with increased policy support, nor with decreased likelihood of voluntarily shifting behaviour. Participants showed moderate reluctance toward changing high‑carbon behaviours through voluntary or policy action but showed a slight preference for voluntary action that ran contrary to our initial predictions. This was mirrored within thematic analysis of our open-ended questions that revealed two main themes: (1) The desire for personal choice, which includes the option of not changing one's behaviour, and (2) High‑carbon lifestyles increase happiness. Overall, our findings suggest that individuals with high SES are unlikely to reduce lifestyle-related emissions, or support policy to this effect, when it requires them to make direct changes to high‑carbon behaviours. To change high‑carbon lifestyles of individuals with high SES, citizens should be supported in envisioning and creating pathways for sufficiency-focused lower-carbon lifestyles that can be desirable <em>and</em> fulfilling.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"126 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625001951\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625001951","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

改变高社会经济地位个人的高碳生活方式是减少温室气体排放和在减缓气候变化过程中确保社会公正的重要一步。然而,转变高碳生活方式可能会带来挑战,特别是当许多高碳行为(如频繁飞行和拥有汽车)被用来表明个人在社交网络中的地位时。在这里,我们报告了英国一项预先注册的在线混合方法研究的结果(N = 511),该研究检查了关于高碳行为的描述性规范与政策支持以及自愿减少这些行为以减缓气候变化的可能性之间的关系。与我们的假设相反,我们发现描述性规范与政策支持的增加没有意义的联系,也没有减少自愿改变行为的可能性。参与者对通过自愿或政策行动改变高碳行为表现出适度的不情愿,但对自愿行动表现出轻微的偏好,这与我们最初的预测相反。这反映在我们开放式问题的主题分析中,揭示了两个主要主题:(1)对个人选择的渴望,其中包括不改变自己行为的选择;(2)高碳生活方式会增加幸福感。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,当需要他们直接改变高碳行为时,高SES的个人不太可能减少与生活方式相关的排放,也不太可能支持这方面的政策。为了改变高社会经济地位个体的高碳生活方式,应该支持公民设想和创造以充足为重点的低碳生活方式,这是可取的和令人满意的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“I can't compromise the quality of my life I'm sorry”: Privileged individuals in the United Kingdom show little willingness to change high-carbon lifestyles
Changing high‑carbon lifestyles of individuals with high socioeconomic status (SES) is an important step toward reducing greenhouse gas emissions and ensuring social justice within climate change mitigation. However, shifting high‑carbon lifestyles may present a challenge, especially when many high‑carbon behaviours (such as frequent flying and car ownership) are used to signal status within individuals' social networks. Here, we report the findings of a pre-registered online mixed-methods study in the UK (N = 511) that examined the associations of descriptive norms about high‑carbon behaviours with policy support and with the likelihood to voluntarily reduce these behaviours for climate change mitigation. Contrary to our hypotheses, we found no meaningful association of descriptive norms with increased policy support, nor with decreased likelihood of voluntarily shifting behaviour. Participants showed moderate reluctance toward changing high‑carbon behaviours through voluntary or policy action but showed a slight preference for voluntary action that ran contrary to our initial predictions. This was mirrored within thematic analysis of our open-ended questions that revealed two main themes: (1) The desire for personal choice, which includes the option of not changing one's behaviour, and (2) High‑carbon lifestyles increase happiness. Overall, our findings suggest that individuals with high SES are unlikely to reduce lifestyle-related emissions, or support policy to this effect, when it requires them to make direct changes to high‑carbon behaviours. To change high‑carbon lifestyles of individuals with high SES, citizens should be supported in envisioning and creating pathways for sufficiency-focused lower-carbon lifestyles that can be desirable and fulfilling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信