{"title":"各种手术入路治疗胫骨平台后外侧骨折的网络荟萃分析","authors":"Peng Jiang , Wenjie Chen , Liang'en Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to systematically compare the clinical efficacy and safety of different surgical approaches in the treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau fractures. Specifically, it evaluated operative time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, postoperative knee function, and complication rates, to provide evidence-based guidance for clinical surgical approach selection.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in seven major databases—CNKI, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, VIP, and EMBASE—from their inception to May 2025. Controlled studies comparing different surgical approaches for posterolateral tibial plateau fractures were included. Primary outcomes were operative time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, postoperative Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee scores, and incidence of postoperative complications. A network meta-analysis was performed using Stata 16.0. A network diagram and league table were generated to present both direct and indirect comparisons among surgical approaches. Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve (SUCRA) values were used to rank the interventions. Study quality was assessed using the MINORS scale. Inconsistency testing and publication bias analysis were also conducted to ensure robustness of the results.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 26 studies involving 1864 patients and seven surgical approaches were included. The network meta-analysis showed that the Modified Extended Anterolateral Approach (MEALA) ranked highest across all primary outcomes: operative time (SUCRA: 97.8 %), intraoperative blood loss (94.9 %), fracture healing time (95.0 %), postoperative HSS score (98.2 %), and complication rate (78.5 %). Additionally, the Transfibular Head Approach (TFHA) demonstrated advantages in minimizing intraoperative blood loss and controlling complications. No significant inconsistency or publication bias was detected based on node-splitting analysis and funnel plot assessment, indicating robust results.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The Modified Extended Anterolateral Approach demonstrates superior overall performance in the treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau fractures, particularly in reducing operative time, minimizing intraoperative trauma, and enhancing postoperative functional recovery. The Transfibular Head Approach also shows potential benefits in complication management. Surgical approach selection should be individualized based on fracture morphology and surgeon experience. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 8","pages":"Article 112457"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Network meta-analysis of various surgical approaches for the treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau fractures\",\"authors\":\"Peng Jiang , Wenjie Chen , Liang'en Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to systematically compare the clinical efficacy and safety of different surgical approaches in the treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau fractures. Specifically, it evaluated operative time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, postoperative knee function, and complication rates, to provide evidence-based guidance for clinical surgical approach selection.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in seven major databases—CNKI, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, VIP, and EMBASE—from their inception to May 2025. Controlled studies comparing different surgical approaches for posterolateral tibial plateau fractures were included. Primary outcomes were operative time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, postoperative Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee scores, and incidence of postoperative complications. A network meta-analysis was performed using Stata 16.0. A network diagram and league table were generated to present both direct and indirect comparisons among surgical approaches. Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve (SUCRA) values were used to rank the interventions. Study quality was assessed using the MINORS scale. Inconsistency testing and publication bias analysis were also conducted to ensure robustness of the results.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 26 studies involving 1864 patients and seven surgical approaches were included. The network meta-analysis showed that the Modified Extended Anterolateral Approach (MEALA) ranked highest across all primary outcomes: operative time (SUCRA: 97.8 %), intraoperative blood loss (94.9 %), fracture healing time (95.0 %), postoperative HSS score (98.2 %), and complication rate (78.5 %). Additionally, the Transfibular Head Approach (TFHA) demonstrated advantages in minimizing intraoperative blood loss and controlling complications. No significant inconsistency or publication bias was detected based on node-splitting analysis and funnel plot assessment, indicating robust results.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The Modified Extended Anterolateral Approach demonstrates superior overall performance in the treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau fractures, particularly in reducing operative time, minimizing intraoperative trauma, and enhancing postoperative functional recovery. The Transfibular Head Approach also shows potential benefits in complication management. Surgical approach selection should be individualized based on fracture morphology and surgeon experience. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate these findings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"volume\":\"56 8\",\"pages\":\"Article 112457\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325003183\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325003183","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的系统比较不同手术入路治疗胫骨平台后外侧骨折的临床疗效和安全性。具体而言,评估手术时间、术中出血量、骨折愈合时间、术后膝关节功能、并发症发生率,为临床手术入路选择提供循证指导。方法对中国知网(cnki)、PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、Scopus、VIP、embase等7个主要数据库自其建立至2025年5月进行综合文献检索。对照研究比较了胫骨平台后外侧骨折的不同手术入路。主要结局为手术时间、术中出血量、骨折愈合时间、术后特殊外科医院(HSS)膝关节评分和术后并发症发生率。使用Stata 16.0进行网络meta分析。生成网络图和排名表,以显示手术入路之间的直接和间接比较。采用累积排序曲线下曲面(SUCRA)值对干预措施进行排序。使用未成年人量表评估研究质量。还进行了不一致检验和发表偏倚分析,以确保结果的稳健性。结果共纳入26项研究,涉及1864例患者和7种手术入路。网络meta分析显示,改良扩展前外侧入路(MEALA)在所有主要结果中均排名最高:手术时间(SUCRA: 97.8%)、术中出血量(94.9%)、骨折愈合时间(95.0%)、术后HSS评分(98.2%)和并发症发生率(78.5%)。此外,经腓骨头入路(TFHA)在减少术中出血量和控制并发症方面具有优势。基于节点分裂分析和漏斗图评估,未发现显著的不一致或发表偏倚,表明结果稳健性。结论改良扩展前外侧入路在治疗胫骨平台后外侧骨折方面具有较好的综合效果,特别是在缩短手术时间、减少术中创伤和增强术后功能恢复方面。经腓骨头入路在并发症处理中也显示出潜在的益处。手术入路的选择应根据骨折形态和外科医生的经验进行个体化。需要进一步的高质量随机对照试验来验证这些发现。
Network meta-analysis of various surgical approaches for the treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau fractures
Objective
This study aimed to systematically compare the clinical efficacy and safety of different surgical approaches in the treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau fractures. Specifically, it evaluated operative time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, postoperative knee function, and complication rates, to provide evidence-based guidance for clinical surgical approach selection.
Methods
A comprehensive literature search was conducted in seven major databases—CNKI, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, VIP, and EMBASE—from their inception to May 2025. Controlled studies comparing different surgical approaches for posterolateral tibial plateau fractures were included. Primary outcomes were operative time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, postoperative Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee scores, and incidence of postoperative complications. A network meta-analysis was performed using Stata 16.0. A network diagram and league table were generated to present both direct and indirect comparisons among surgical approaches. Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve (SUCRA) values were used to rank the interventions. Study quality was assessed using the MINORS scale. Inconsistency testing and publication bias analysis were also conducted to ensure robustness of the results.
Results
A total of 26 studies involving 1864 patients and seven surgical approaches were included. The network meta-analysis showed that the Modified Extended Anterolateral Approach (MEALA) ranked highest across all primary outcomes: operative time (SUCRA: 97.8 %), intraoperative blood loss (94.9 %), fracture healing time (95.0 %), postoperative HSS score (98.2 %), and complication rate (78.5 %). Additionally, the Transfibular Head Approach (TFHA) demonstrated advantages in minimizing intraoperative blood loss and controlling complications. No significant inconsistency or publication bias was detected based on node-splitting analysis and funnel plot assessment, indicating robust results.
Conclusion
The Modified Extended Anterolateral Approach demonstrates superior overall performance in the treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau fractures, particularly in reducing operative time, minimizing intraoperative trauma, and enhancing postoperative functional recovery. The Transfibular Head Approach also shows potential benefits in complication management. Surgical approach selection should be individualized based on fracture morphology and surgeon experience. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate these findings.
期刊介绍:
Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.