基于多不饱和脂肪酸的营养流量定量评估表明,无论水坝如何,高质量的藻类都支持水生食物网

IF 3.8 1区 地球科学 Q1 LIMNOLOGY
Juan Huang, Fen Guo, Martin J. Kainz, Stuart E. Bunn, Xiaoguang Ouyang, Feilong Li, Qingping Du, Yuan Zhang
{"title":"基于多不饱和脂肪酸的营养流量定量评估表明,无论水坝如何,高质量的藻类都支持水生食物网","authors":"Juan Huang, Fen Guo, Martin J. Kainz, Stuart E. Bunn, Xiaoguang Ouyang, Feilong Li, Qingping Du, Yuan Zhang","doi":"10.1002/lno.70100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High‐quality, yet less abundant, food sources sustain river food webs. However, the impacts of dams on these sources and their nutritional contributions to aquatic animals are not well understood. A substantial knowledge gap exists in understanding the quantitative contribution of basal food sources, such as periphyton, to aquatic animal diets and their role in supporting aquatic animals. This study fills this gap by using long‐chain polyunsaturated fatty acids as biomarkers to quantify the dietary contributions of periphyton, submerged leaves, and macrophytes to macroinvertebrates and fish in dammed rivers. Our results showed that periphyton contributed more to the lipid diets of macroinvertebrates and fish than submerged leaves and macrophytes, regardless of dams, and was a high‐quality food source supporting aquatic food webs. The dietary contribution of periphyton to macroinvertebrates decreased at the downstream sites of small dams compared to the upstream sites, while the contribution of leaves and macrophytes increased due to dam‐induced changes in periphyton nutritional quality. The nutritional quality of periphyton correlated positively with its contribution to invertebrate grazers and filterers, while its contribution to fish varied depending on the feeding strategies of fish species. Our findings underscore periphyton as a high‐quality dietary source in dammed river ecosystems and suggest that improving its nutritional quality enhances its contribution to the lipid diets of macroinvertebrates and fish.","PeriodicalId":18143,"journal":{"name":"Limnology and Oceanography","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative assessment of trophic flow based on polyunsaturated fatty acids reveals that high‐quality algae support aquatic food webs irrespective of dams\",\"authors\":\"Juan Huang, Fen Guo, Martin J. Kainz, Stuart E. Bunn, Xiaoguang Ouyang, Feilong Li, Qingping Du, Yuan Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lno.70100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"High‐quality, yet less abundant, food sources sustain river food webs. However, the impacts of dams on these sources and their nutritional contributions to aquatic animals are not well understood. A substantial knowledge gap exists in understanding the quantitative contribution of basal food sources, such as periphyton, to aquatic animal diets and their role in supporting aquatic animals. This study fills this gap by using long‐chain polyunsaturated fatty acids as biomarkers to quantify the dietary contributions of periphyton, submerged leaves, and macrophytes to macroinvertebrates and fish in dammed rivers. Our results showed that periphyton contributed more to the lipid diets of macroinvertebrates and fish than submerged leaves and macrophytes, regardless of dams, and was a high‐quality food source supporting aquatic food webs. The dietary contribution of periphyton to macroinvertebrates decreased at the downstream sites of small dams compared to the upstream sites, while the contribution of leaves and macrophytes increased due to dam‐induced changes in periphyton nutritional quality. The nutritional quality of periphyton correlated positively with its contribution to invertebrate grazers and filterers, while its contribution to fish varied depending on the feeding strategies of fish species. Our findings underscore periphyton as a high‐quality dietary source in dammed river ecosystems and suggest that improving its nutritional quality enhances its contribution to the lipid diets of macroinvertebrates and fish.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Limnology and Oceanography\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Limnology and Oceanography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.70100\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LIMNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Limnology and Oceanography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.70100","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LIMNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高质量但不那么丰富的食物来源维持着河流的食物网。然而,大坝对这些水源的影响及其对水生动物的营养贡献尚不清楚。在了解基础食物来源(如水生植物)对水生动物饮食的定量贡献及其在支持水生动物方面的作用方面,存在着实质性的知识差距。本研究通过使用长链多不饱和脂肪酸作为生物标志物来量化围生植物、淹没叶和大型植物对水坝河流中大型无脊椎动物和鱼类的饮食贡献,填补了这一空白。我们的研究结果表明,无论水坝大小,浮游植物对大型无脊椎动物和鱼类的脂质饮食的贡献都大于淹没叶片和大型植物,并且是支持水生食物网的高质量食物来源。与上游相比,小坝下游的周边植物对大型无脊椎动物的膳食贡献有所减少,而叶片和大型植物的贡献则由于大坝引起的周边植物营养质量的变化而增加。周边植物的营养品质与其对无脊椎食草动物和滤食动物的贡献呈正相关,而对鱼类的贡献则因鱼类的摄食策略而异。我们的研究结果强调了周生植物在水坝河流生态系统中是一种高质量的膳食来源,并表明提高其营养质量可以增强其对大型无脊椎动物和鱼类脂质饮食的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitative assessment of trophic flow based on polyunsaturated fatty acids reveals that high‐quality algae support aquatic food webs irrespective of dams
High‐quality, yet less abundant, food sources sustain river food webs. However, the impacts of dams on these sources and their nutritional contributions to aquatic animals are not well understood. A substantial knowledge gap exists in understanding the quantitative contribution of basal food sources, such as periphyton, to aquatic animal diets and their role in supporting aquatic animals. This study fills this gap by using long‐chain polyunsaturated fatty acids as biomarkers to quantify the dietary contributions of periphyton, submerged leaves, and macrophytes to macroinvertebrates and fish in dammed rivers. Our results showed that periphyton contributed more to the lipid diets of macroinvertebrates and fish than submerged leaves and macrophytes, regardless of dams, and was a high‐quality food source supporting aquatic food webs. The dietary contribution of periphyton to macroinvertebrates decreased at the downstream sites of small dams compared to the upstream sites, while the contribution of leaves and macrophytes increased due to dam‐induced changes in periphyton nutritional quality. The nutritional quality of periphyton correlated positively with its contribution to invertebrate grazers and filterers, while its contribution to fish varied depending on the feeding strategies of fish species. Our findings underscore periphyton as a high‐quality dietary source in dammed river ecosystems and suggest that improving its nutritional quality enhances its contribution to the lipid diets of macroinvertebrates and fish.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Limnology and Oceanography
Limnology and Oceanography 地学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
254
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Limnology and Oceanography (L&O; print ISSN 0024-3590, online ISSN 1939-5590) publishes original articles, including scholarly reviews, about all aspects of limnology and oceanography. The journal''s unifying theme is the understanding of aquatic systems. Submissions are judged on the originality of their data, interpretations, and ideas, and on the degree to which they can be generalized beyond the particular aquatic system examined. Laboratory and modeling studies must demonstrate relevance to field environments; typically this means that they are bolstered by substantial "real-world" data. Few purely theoretical or purely empirical papers are accepted for review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信