较小的浮游植物大小群控制着自养群落的化学计量

IF 3.8 1区 地球科学 Q1 LIMNOLOGY
Thomas Mollica, Hanna Farnelid, Elin Lindehoff, Catherine Legrand
{"title":"较小的浮游植物大小群控制着自养群落的化学计量","authors":"Thomas Mollica, Hanna Farnelid, Elin Lindehoff, Catherine Legrand","doi":"10.1002/lno.70058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the marine environment, the prevailing paradigm is that larger organisms like diatoms are primary contributors to phytoplankton stoichiometry. Numerous studies investigated the stoichiometry of phytoplankton groups or total community but its dynamics among different size‐groups are not resolved. In exploring the influence of phytoplankton community composition and succession on seasonal stoichiometry in the Baltic Sea, our study reveals that smaller size‐groups, such as nanoplankton and picoplankton, play a more significant role than traditionally thought. During seasonal transitions in nutrient availability—from nutrient‐rich spring conditions favoring diatoms and dinoflagellates to nitrogen‐limited summer conditions favorable for cyanobacteria—the Baltic Proper exhibits marked shifts in community structure and offers a unique system to investigate stoichiometric dynamics. Our yearly sampling at an offshore station using a size‐fraction protocol unveils that the stoichiometry within larger size fractions (&gt; 20 <jats:italic>μ</jats:italic>m) does not reflect the overall community's stoichiometry. Instead, nanoplankton and picoplankton dominate nutrient cycling processes despite their smaller size. On any occasion, they represent between 55% and 90% of the biomass making them critical for nitrogen and phosphorus uptake and photosynthetic carbon fixation. These findings challenge the plankton stoichiometry paradigm and highlight the necessity to include these smaller phytoplankton groups into future climate change models to improve predictions regarding ecosystem responses to eutrophication and environmental changes.","PeriodicalId":18143,"journal":{"name":"Limnology and Oceanography","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Smaller phytoplankton size‐groups control the stoichiometry of the autotrophic community\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Mollica, Hanna Farnelid, Elin Lindehoff, Catherine Legrand\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lno.70058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the marine environment, the prevailing paradigm is that larger organisms like diatoms are primary contributors to phytoplankton stoichiometry. Numerous studies investigated the stoichiometry of phytoplankton groups or total community but its dynamics among different size‐groups are not resolved. In exploring the influence of phytoplankton community composition and succession on seasonal stoichiometry in the Baltic Sea, our study reveals that smaller size‐groups, such as nanoplankton and picoplankton, play a more significant role than traditionally thought. During seasonal transitions in nutrient availability—from nutrient‐rich spring conditions favoring diatoms and dinoflagellates to nitrogen‐limited summer conditions favorable for cyanobacteria—the Baltic Proper exhibits marked shifts in community structure and offers a unique system to investigate stoichiometric dynamics. Our yearly sampling at an offshore station using a size‐fraction protocol unveils that the stoichiometry within larger size fractions (&gt; 20 <jats:italic>μ</jats:italic>m) does not reflect the overall community's stoichiometry. Instead, nanoplankton and picoplankton dominate nutrient cycling processes despite their smaller size. On any occasion, they represent between 55% and 90% of the biomass making them critical for nitrogen and phosphorus uptake and photosynthetic carbon fixation. These findings challenge the plankton stoichiometry paradigm and highlight the necessity to include these smaller phytoplankton groups into future climate change models to improve predictions regarding ecosystem responses to eutrophication and environmental changes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Limnology and Oceanography\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Limnology and Oceanography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.70058\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LIMNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Limnology and Oceanography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.70058","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LIMNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在海洋环境中,普遍认为硅藻等较大的生物是浮游植物化学计量的主要贡献者。许多研究对浮游植物群或总群落的化学计量学进行了研究,但其在不同大小群之间的动态尚未得到解决。在探讨波罗的海浮游植物群落组成和演替对季节化学计量的影响时,我们的研究表明,纳米浮游生物和微浮游生物等较小的浮游植物群比传统认为的更重要。在养分有效性的季节性转变期间——从有利于硅藻和鞭毛藻的养分丰富的春季条件到有利于蓝藻的氮限制的夏季条件——波罗的海Proper显示出显著的群落结构变化,并提供了一个独特的系统来研究化学计量动力学。我们在海上站点使用粒径-分数协议进行年度采样,揭示了较大粒径分数(>;20 μm)不能反映群落的整体化学计量特征。相反,纳米浮游生物和微浮游生物尽管体积较小,但在营养循环过程中占主导地位。在任何情况下,它们占生物量的55%到90%,这使得它们对氮和磷的吸收和光合作用的碳固定至关重要。这些发现对浮游生物化学计量学范式提出了挑战,并强调了将这些较小的浮游植物类群纳入未来气候变化模型的必要性,以改进对生态系统对富营养化和环境变化的响应的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Smaller phytoplankton size‐groups control the stoichiometry of the autotrophic community
In the marine environment, the prevailing paradigm is that larger organisms like diatoms are primary contributors to phytoplankton stoichiometry. Numerous studies investigated the stoichiometry of phytoplankton groups or total community but its dynamics among different size‐groups are not resolved. In exploring the influence of phytoplankton community composition and succession on seasonal stoichiometry in the Baltic Sea, our study reveals that smaller size‐groups, such as nanoplankton and picoplankton, play a more significant role than traditionally thought. During seasonal transitions in nutrient availability—from nutrient‐rich spring conditions favoring diatoms and dinoflagellates to nitrogen‐limited summer conditions favorable for cyanobacteria—the Baltic Proper exhibits marked shifts in community structure and offers a unique system to investigate stoichiometric dynamics. Our yearly sampling at an offshore station using a size‐fraction protocol unveils that the stoichiometry within larger size fractions (> 20 μm) does not reflect the overall community's stoichiometry. Instead, nanoplankton and picoplankton dominate nutrient cycling processes despite their smaller size. On any occasion, they represent between 55% and 90% of the biomass making them critical for nitrogen and phosphorus uptake and photosynthetic carbon fixation. These findings challenge the plankton stoichiometry paradigm and highlight the necessity to include these smaller phytoplankton groups into future climate change models to improve predictions regarding ecosystem responses to eutrophication and environmental changes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Limnology and Oceanography
Limnology and Oceanography 地学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
254
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Limnology and Oceanography (L&O; print ISSN 0024-3590, online ISSN 1939-5590) publishes original articles, including scholarly reviews, about all aspects of limnology and oceanography. The journal''s unifying theme is the understanding of aquatic systems. Submissions are judged on the originality of their data, interpretations, and ideas, and on the degree to which they can be generalized beyond the particular aquatic system examined. Laboratory and modeling studies must demonstrate relevance to field environments; typically this means that they are bolstered by substantial "real-world" data. Few purely theoretical or purely empirical papers are accepted for review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信