一项多中心研究:胸腔穿刺后超声与胸部x线评价积液排出和肺再扩张。

Ankush Ratwani, Horiana B Grosu, Shaikh M Noor Husnain, Trinidad M Sanchez, Gulmira Yermakhanova, Jasleen Pannu, Labib G Debiane, Zachary DePew, Lonny Yarmus, Fabien Maldonado, Robert J Lentz, Otis B Rickman, David Feller-Kopman, Muhammad H Arain, Holly New, Heidi Chen, Sheau-Chiann Chen, David E Ost, Frank Dana, Leila Rezai Gharai, Mark Parker, Peter Mj Lee, Danai Khemasuwan, Ray W Shepherd, Najib M Rahman, Samira Shojaee
{"title":"一项多中心研究:胸腔穿刺后超声与胸部x线评价积液排出和肺再扩张。","authors":"Ankush Ratwani, Horiana B Grosu, Shaikh M Noor Husnain, Trinidad M Sanchez, Gulmira Yermakhanova, Jasleen Pannu, Labib G Debiane, Zachary DePew, Lonny Yarmus, Fabien Maldonado, Robert J Lentz, Otis B Rickman, David Feller-Kopman, Muhammad H Arain, Holly New, Heidi Chen, Sheau-Chiann Chen, David E Ost, Frank Dana, Leila Rezai Gharai, Mark Parker, Peter Mj Lee, Danai Khemasuwan, Ray W Shepherd, Najib M Rahman, Samira Shojaee","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202410-1095OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Post-thoracentesis chest radiography (CXR) is often used to evaluate the degree of residual fluid post-thoracentesis. Whether post-drainage ultrasound exam is comparable to CXR in the evaluation of pleural space evacuation is unknown.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>How do post-thoracentesis ultrasound and CXR compare in assessing the effectiveness of pleural space evacuation?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, multicenter study, patients with free-flowing pleural effusions with minimal to no septations requiring thoracentesis were recruited. Post-thoracentesis ultrasound was performed immediately post-procedure; CXR was performed within 4-hours post-procedure. The primary outcome was agreement on complete pleural space evacuation between ultrasound and CXR. Complete pleural space evacuation was defined as the absence of pleural fluid on anterior, mid-axillary, and posterior ultrasound views and lack of costophrenic angle blunting on CXR. Interobserver reliability was assessed via independent image reviews by two pulmonologists and two radiologists blinded to patient/procedure data, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 147 patients enrolled (February/2021 - May/2022), 145 were included in the final analysis. The median age was 64 years (56-75), and malignancy was the most frequent effusion etiology (n=49). The lung was considered trapped in 50% (n=73). A total of 826 ultrasound images were collected for blind review. The Gwet's Agreement Coefficient 1 (AC1) assessing complete pleural evacuation between ultrasound and CXR was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.83-1.00). When assessing agreement based on the pre-specified criteria of effusion size (small vs large), a substantial level of agreement was observed between ultrasound and CXR, indicated by a kappa of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.51-0.77). There was a strong agreement (kappa= 0.81 (95% CI: 0.71-0.90)) between proceduralist and blind ultrasound reviewers regarding complete pleural space evacuation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Post-thoracentesis ultrasound is an equally effective alternative to CXR in evaluating pleural space evacuation in simple pleural effusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-thoracentesis Ultrasound vs. Chest X-ray for the Evaluation of Effusion Evacuation and Lung Re-Expansion, A Multicenter Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ankush Ratwani, Horiana B Grosu, Shaikh M Noor Husnain, Trinidad M Sanchez, Gulmira Yermakhanova, Jasleen Pannu, Labib G Debiane, Zachary DePew, Lonny Yarmus, Fabien Maldonado, Robert J Lentz, Otis B Rickman, David Feller-Kopman, Muhammad H Arain, Holly New, Heidi Chen, Sheau-Chiann Chen, David E Ost, Frank Dana, Leila Rezai Gharai, Mark Parker, Peter Mj Lee, Danai Khemasuwan, Ray W Shepherd, Najib M Rahman, Samira Shojaee\",\"doi\":\"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202410-1095OC\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Post-thoracentesis chest radiography (CXR) is often used to evaluate the degree of residual fluid post-thoracentesis. Whether post-drainage ultrasound exam is comparable to CXR in the evaluation of pleural space evacuation is unknown.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>How do post-thoracentesis ultrasound and CXR compare in assessing the effectiveness of pleural space evacuation?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, multicenter study, patients with free-flowing pleural effusions with minimal to no septations requiring thoracentesis were recruited. Post-thoracentesis ultrasound was performed immediately post-procedure; CXR was performed within 4-hours post-procedure. The primary outcome was agreement on complete pleural space evacuation between ultrasound and CXR. Complete pleural space evacuation was defined as the absence of pleural fluid on anterior, mid-axillary, and posterior ultrasound views and lack of costophrenic angle blunting on CXR. Interobserver reliability was assessed via independent image reviews by two pulmonologists and two radiologists blinded to patient/procedure data, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 147 patients enrolled (February/2021 - May/2022), 145 were included in the final analysis. The median age was 64 years (56-75), and malignancy was the most frequent effusion etiology (n=49). The lung was considered trapped in 50% (n=73). A total of 826 ultrasound images were collected for blind review. The Gwet's Agreement Coefficient 1 (AC1) assessing complete pleural evacuation between ultrasound and CXR was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.83-1.00). When assessing agreement based on the pre-specified criteria of effusion size (small vs large), a substantial level of agreement was observed between ultrasound and CXR, indicated by a kappa of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.51-0.77). There was a strong agreement (kappa= 0.81 (95% CI: 0.71-0.90)) between proceduralist and blind ultrasound reviewers regarding complete pleural space evacuation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Post-thoracentesis ultrasound is an equally effective alternative to CXR in evaluating pleural space evacuation in simple pleural effusions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202410-1095OC\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202410-1095OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:胸腔穿刺后胸部x线摄影(CXR)常用于评估胸腔穿刺后积液的程度。引流后超声检查是否可与CXR评估胸膜间隙排出性尚不清楚。研究问题:胸腔穿刺后超声与CXR在评估胸腔间隙抽吸效果方面的比较如何?方法:在这项前瞻性的多中心研究中,招募了有自由流动的胸腔积液且很少或没有分隔需要胸腔穿刺的患者。术后立即行胸腔镜超声检查;术后4小时内进行CXR。主要结果是超声和CXR在胸膜间隙完全清除方面的一致。完全胸膜间隙排空定义为在前、腋中、后超声上没有胸膜积液,在x光检查上没有肋膈角钝化。观察者间的可靠性由两名肺科医生和两名不了解患者/手术数据的放射科医生通过独立的图像评价进行评估,分歧由第三名评价者解决。结果:在纳入的147例患者中(2021年2月- 2022年5月),145例患者被纳入最终分析。中位年龄为64岁(56-75岁),恶性肿瘤是最常见的积液病因(n=49)。50%患者认为肺被困住(n=73)。共收集826张超声图像进行盲检。超声和CXR之间评估完全胸膜引流的Gwet一致系数1 (AC1)为0.93 (95% CI: 0.83-1.00)。当根据预先指定的积液大小标准(小与大)评估一致性时,超声和CXR之间观察到相当程度的一致性,kappa为0.64 (95% CI: 0.51-0.77)。在程序医师和盲超声审查员之间,关于完全胸膜间隙清除有很强的一致性(kappa= 0.81 (95% CI: 0.71-0.90))。结论:胸腔穿刺后超声在评价单纯性胸腔积液胸膜间隙排出方面与CXR同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Post-thoracentesis Ultrasound vs. Chest X-ray for the Evaluation of Effusion Evacuation and Lung Re-Expansion, A Multicenter Study.

Introduction: Post-thoracentesis chest radiography (CXR) is often used to evaluate the degree of residual fluid post-thoracentesis. Whether post-drainage ultrasound exam is comparable to CXR in the evaluation of pleural space evacuation is unknown.

Research question: How do post-thoracentesis ultrasound and CXR compare in assessing the effectiveness of pleural space evacuation?

Methods: In this prospective, multicenter study, patients with free-flowing pleural effusions with minimal to no septations requiring thoracentesis were recruited. Post-thoracentesis ultrasound was performed immediately post-procedure; CXR was performed within 4-hours post-procedure. The primary outcome was agreement on complete pleural space evacuation between ultrasound and CXR. Complete pleural space evacuation was defined as the absence of pleural fluid on anterior, mid-axillary, and posterior ultrasound views and lack of costophrenic angle blunting on CXR. Interobserver reliability was assessed via independent image reviews by two pulmonologists and two radiologists blinded to patient/procedure data, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer.

Results: Of the 147 patients enrolled (February/2021 - May/2022), 145 were included in the final analysis. The median age was 64 years (56-75), and malignancy was the most frequent effusion etiology (n=49). The lung was considered trapped in 50% (n=73). A total of 826 ultrasound images were collected for blind review. The Gwet's Agreement Coefficient 1 (AC1) assessing complete pleural evacuation between ultrasound and CXR was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.83-1.00). When assessing agreement based on the pre-specified criteria of effusion size (small vs large), a substantial level of agreement was observed between ultrasound and CXR, indicated by a kappa of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.51-0.77). There was a strong agreement (kappa= 0.81 (95% CI: 0.71-0.90)) between proceduralist and blind ultrasound reviewers regarding complete pleural space evacuation.

Conclusion: Post-thoracentesis ultrasound is an equally effective alternative to CXR in evaluating pleural space evacuation in simple pleural effusions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信