Ankush Ratwani, Horiana B Grosu, Shaikh M Noor Husnain, Trinidad M Sanchez, Gulmira Yermakhanova, Jasleen Pannu, Labib G Debiane, Zachary DePew, Lonny Yarmus, Fabien Maldonado, Robert J Lentz, Otis B Rickman, David Feller-Kopman, Muhammad H Arain, Holly New, Heidi Chen, Sheau-Chiann Chen, David E Ost, Frank Dana, Leila Rezai Gharai, Mark Parker, Peter Mj Lee, Danai Khemasuwan, Ray W Shepherd, Najib M Rahman, Samira Shojaee
{"title":"一项多中心研究:胸腔穿刺后超声与胸部x线评价积液排出和肺再扩张。","authors":"Ankush Ratwani, Horiana B Grosu, Shaikh M Noor Husnain, Trinidad M Sanchez, Gulmira Yermakhanova, Jasleen Pannu, Labib G Debiane, Zachary DePew, Lonny Yarmus, Fabien Maldonado, Robert J Lentz, Otis B Rickman, David Feller-Kopman, Muhammad H Arain, Holly New, Heidi Chen, Sheau-Chiann Chen, David E Ost, Frank Dana, Leila Rezai Gharai, Mark Parker, Peter Mj Lee, Danai Khemasuwan, Ray W Shepherd, Najib M Rahman, Samira Shojaee","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202410-1095OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Post-thoracentesis chest radiography (CXR) is often used to evaluate the degree of residual fluid post-thoracentesis. Whether post-drainage ultrasound exam is comparable to CXR in the evaluation of pleural space evacuation is unknown.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>How do post-thoracentesis ultrasound and CXR compare in assessing the effectiveness of pleural space evacuation?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, multicenter study, patients with free-flowing pleural effusions with minimal to no septations requiring thoracentesis were recruited. Post-thoracentesis ultrasound was performed immediately post-procedure; CXR was performed within 4-hours post-procedure. The primary outcome was agreement on complete pleural space evacuation between ultrasound and CXR. Complete pleural space evacuation was defined as the absence of pleural fluid on anterior, mid-axillary, and posterior ultrasound views and lack of costophrenic angle blunting on CXR. Interobserver reliability was assessed via independent image reviews by two pulmonologists and two radiologists blinded to patient/procedure data, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 147 patients enrolled (February/2021 - May/2022), 145 were included in the final analysis. The median age was 64 years (56-75), and malignancy was the most frequent effusion etiology (n=49). The lung was considered trapped in 50% (n=73). A total of 826 ultrasound images were collected for blind review. The Gwet's Agreement Coefficient 1 (AC1) assessing complete pleural evacuation between ultrasound and CXR was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.83-1.00). When assessing agreement based on the pre-specified criteria of effusion size (small vs large), a substantial level of agreement was observed between ultrasound and CXR, indicated by a kappa of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.51-0.77). There was a strong agreement (kappa= 0.81 (95% CI: 0.71-0.90)) between proceduralist and blind ultrasound reviewers regarding complete pleural space evacuation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Post-thoracentesis ultrasound is an equally effective alternative to CXR in evaluating pleural space evacuation in simple pleural effusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-thoracentesis Ultrasound vs. Chest X-ray for the Evaluation of Effusion Evacuation and Lung Re-Expansion, A Multicenter Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ankush Ratwani, Horiana B Grosu, Shaikh M Noor Husnain, Trinidad M Sanchez, Gulmira Yermakhanova, Jasleen Pannu, Labib G Debiane, Zachary DePew, Lonny Yarmus, Fabien Maldonado, Robert J Lentz, Otis B Rickman, David Feller-Kopman, Muhammad H Arain, Holly New, Heidi Chen, Sheau-Chiann Chen, David E Ost, Frank Dana, Leila Rezai Gharai, Mark Parker, Peter Mj Lee, Danai Khemasuwan, Ray W Shepherd, Najib M Rahman, Samira Shojaee\",\"doi\":\"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202410-1095OC\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Post-thoracentesis chest radiography (CXR) is often used to evaluate the degree of residual fluid post-thoracentesis. Whether post-drainage ultrasound exam is comparable to CXR in the evaluation of pleural space evacuation is unknown.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>How do post-thoracentesis ultrasound and CXR compare in assessing the effectiveness of pleural space evacuation?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, multicenter study, patients with free-flowing pleural effusions with minimal to no septations requiring thoracentesis were recruited. Post-thoracentesis ultrasound was performed immediately post-procedure; CXR was performed within 4-hours post-procedure. The primary outcome was agreement on complete pleural space evacuation between ultrasound and CXR. Complete pleural space evacuation was defined as the absence of pleural fluid on anterior, mid-axillary, and posterior ultrasound views and lack of costophrenic angle blunting on CXR. Interobserver reliability was assessed via independent image reviews by two pulmonologists and two radiologists blinded to patient/procedure data, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 147 patients enrolled (February/2021 - May/2022), 145 were included in the final analysis. The median age was 64 years (56-75), and malignancy was the most frequent effusion etiology (n=49). The lung was considered trapped in 50% (n=73). A total of 826 ultrasound images were collected for blind review. The Gwet's Agreement Coefficient 1 (AC1) assessing complete pleural evacuation between ultrasound and CXR was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.83-1.00). When assessing agreement based on the pre-specified criteria of effusion size (small vs large), a substantial level of agreement was observed between ultrasound and CXR, indicated by a kappa of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.51-0.77). There was a strong agreement (kappa= 0.81 (95% CI: 0.71-0.90)) between proceduralist and blind ultrasound reviewers regarding complete pleural space evacuation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Post-thoracentesis ultrasound is an equally effective alternative to CXR in evaluating pleural space evacuation in simple pleural effusions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202410-1095OC\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202410-1095OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Post-thoracentesis Ultrasound vs. Chest X-ray for the Evaluation of Effusion Evacuation and Lung Re-Expansion, A Multicenter Study.
Introduction: Post-thoracentesis chest radiography (CXR) is often used to evaluate the degree of residual fluid post-thoracentesis. Whether post-drainage ultrasound exam is comparable to CXR in the evaluation of pleural space evacuation is unknown.
Research question: How do post-thoracentesis ultrasound and CXR compare in assessing the effectiveness of pleural space evacuation?
Methods: In this prospective, multicenter study, patients with free-flowing pleural effusions with minimal to no septations requiring thoracentesis were recruited. Post-thoracentesis ultrasound was performed immediately post-procedure; CXR was performed within 4-hours post-procedure. The primary outcome was agreement on complete pleural space evacuation between ultrasound and CXR. Complete pleural space evacuation was defined as the absence of pleural fluid on anterior, mid-axillary, and posterior ultrasound views and lack of costophrenic angle blunting on CXR. Interobserver reliability was assessed via independent image reviews by two pulmonologists and two radiologists blinded to patient/procedure data, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer.
Results: Of the 147 patients enrolled (February/2021 - May/2022), 145 were included in the final analysis. The median age was 64 years (56-75), and malignancy was the most frequent effusion etiology (n=49). The lung was considered trapped in 50% (n=73). A total of 826 ultrasound images were collected for blind review. The Gwet's Agreement Coefficient 1 (AC1) assessing complete pleural evacuation between ultrasound and CXR was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.83-1.00). When assessing agreement based on the pre-specified criteria of effusion size (small vs large), a substantial level of agreement was observed between ultrasound and CXR, indicated by a kappa of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.51-0.77). There was a strong agreement (kappa= 0.81 (95% CI: 0.71-0.90)) between proceduralist and blind ultrasound reviewers regarding complete pleural space evacuation.
Conclusion: Post-thoracentesis ultrasound is an equally effective alternative to CXR in evaluating pleural space evacuation in simple pleural effusions.