家庭在慢性危重疾病中跨时间和环境的决策经验。

Amanda C Moale, Chareeni E Kurukulasuriya, Mikhaila N Layshock, Svea Cheng, Robert M Arnold, Renee D Boss, Bryan J McVerry, Douglas B White, Judy C Chang
{"title":"家庭在慢性危重疾病中跨时间和环境的决策经验。","authors":"Amanda C Moale, Chareeni E Kurukulasuriya, Mikhaila N Layshock, Svea Cheng, Robert M Arnold, Renee D Boss, Bryan J McVerry, Douglas B White, Judy C Chang","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202412-1245OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Chronic critical illness (CCI) results in high patient morbidity and mortality and imposes substantial burdens on families as surrogate decision-makers. Prior research has predominantly focused on families' decisional needs before tracheostomy in the ICU, despite CCI unfolding over weeks to months across multiple care transitions and settings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize families' decision-making experiences and reflections along the continuum of CCI, across time and care transitions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with family decision-makers of patients who received a tracheostomy for persistent respiratory failure after an acute illness, first within two weeks to six months after tracheostomy and again weeks to months later. We analyzed data using inductive and deductive analysis methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We interviewed 23 family decision-makers of 19 patients and identified five themes. 1) Tracheostomy is most often presented as a \"needed\" procedure in the acute setting, leaving families with a sense of little choice and limited awareness of the broader, long-term care trajectory; 2) Several families felt pressured to make a certain decision or judged when their decision opposed the team's recommendation, specifically if they perceived the recommendation as misaligned with the patient's goals; 3) After tracheostomy, families accepted ongoing interventions to reach a post-acute facility, which represented hope for recovery; 4) After transitioning to a post-acute facility, families faced uncertainty about recovery expectations and made ongoing decisions focused on overcoming setbacks amidst the rollercoaster of CCI; 5) The passage of time with CCI made it increasingly difficult for families to remain physically and psychologically present, leading to a growing sense of passivity in decision-making and a loss of control over the patient's journey.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found critical problems in communication and support throughout the continuum of CCI. While the framing of tracheostomy as a \"need\" with limited deliberation about long-term implications remains problematic, our findings emphasize that tracheostomy is only one of many decisions families face throughout CCI. Our data suggest shifting the focus from ICU-based 'tracheostomy decision-making' to longitudinal decisional support that extends across time and settings, enabling ongoing reassessment and decision-making based on the patient's evolving trajectory. Word Count: 343/350 Primary Source of Funding: T32 HL 007563 (ACM).</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Families' Experiences Making Decisions across Time and Settings in Chronic Critical Illness.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda C Moale, Chareeni E Kurukulasuriya, Mikhaila N Layshock, Svea Cheng, Robert M Arnold, Renee D Boss, Bryan J McVerry, Douglas B White, Judy C Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202412-1245OC\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Chronic critical illness (CCI) results in high patient morbidity and mortality and imposes substantial burdens on families as surrogate decision-makers. Prior research has predominantly focused on families' decisional needs before tracheostomy in the ICU, despite CCI unfolding over weeks to months across multiple care transitions and settings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize families' decision-making experiences and reflections along the continuum of CCI, across time and care transitions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with family decision-makers of patients who received a tracheostomy for persistent respiratory failure after an acute illness, first within two weeks to six months after tracheostomy and again weeks to months later. We analyzed data using inductive and deductive analysis methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We interviewed 23 family decision-makers of 19 patients and identified five themes. 1) Tracheostomy is most often presented as a \\\"needed\\\" procedure in the acute setting, leaving families with a sense of little choice and limited awareness of the broader, long-term care trajectory; 2) Several families felt pressured to make a certain decision or judged when their decision opposed the team's recommendation, specifically if they perceived the recommendation as misaligned with the patient's goals; 3) After tracheostomy, families accepted ongoing interventions to reach a post-acute facility, which represented hope for recovery; 4) After transitioning to a post-acute facility, families faced uncertainty about recovery expectations and made ongoing decisions focused on overcoming setbacks amidst the rollercoaster of CCI; 5) The passage of time with CCI made it increasingly difficult for families to remain physically and psychologically present, leading to a growing sense of passivity in decision-making and a loss of control over the patient's journey.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found critical problems in communication and support throughout the continuum of CCI. While the framing of tracheostomy as a \\\"need\\\" with limited deliberation about long-term implications remains problematic, our findings emphasize that tracheostomy is only one of many decisions families face throughout CCI. Our data suggest shifting the focus from ICU-based 'tracheostomy decision-making' to longitudinal decisional support that extends across time and settings, enabling ongoing reassessment and decision-making based on the patient's evolving trajectory. Word Count: 343/350 Primary Source of Funding: T32 HL 007563 (ACM).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202412-1245OC\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202412-1245OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由:慢性危重疾病(CCI)导致患者高发病率和死亡率,并给作为替代决策者的家庭带来沉重负担。先前的研究主要集中在ICU气管切开术前的家庭决策需求,尽管CCI在多个护理转变和设置中持续数周至数月。目的:描述家庭在CCI连续过程中的决策经验和反思,跨越时间和护理过渡。方法:我们对因急性疾病后持续性呼吸衰竭而接受气管切开术的患者的家庭决策者进行了半结构化访谈,第一次访谈在气管切开术后两周至六个月内,第二次访谈在几周至几个月后。我们使用归纳和演绎分析方法分析数据。结果:我们采访了19例患者的23名家庭决策者,确定了5个主题。1)气管切开术通常在急性环境中被认为是一项“必要”的手术,这使得家庭几乎没有选择的余地,对更广泛的长期护理轨迹的认识也很有限;2)当一些家庭的决定与团队的建议相反时,特别是当他们认为该建议与患者的目标不一致时,他们会感到做出某些决定或受到评判的压力;3)气管切开术后,家庭接受持续的干预以到达急性后设施,这代表了康复的希望;4)在过渡到急性后设施后,家庭面临着恢复预期的不确定性,并做出了持续的决定,重点是克服CCI过山车中的挫折;5)随着时间的推移,CCI使家属越来越难以保持身体和心理上的存在,导致决策越来越被动,失去对患者旅程的控制。结论:我们在CCI的整个过程中发现了沟通和支持方面的关键问题。虽然将气管切开术作为一种“需要”,并对其长期影响进行有限的考虑仍然存在问题,但我们的研究结果强调,气管切开术只是CCI患者家庭面临的众多决定之一。我们的数据建议将重点从基于重症监护病房的“气管切开术决策”转移到跨越时间和环境的纵向决策支持,从而能够根据患者的发展轨迹进行持续的重新评估和决策。字数:343/350主要资金来源:T32 HL 007563 (ACM)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Families' Experiences Making Decisions across Time and Settings in Chronic Critical Illness.

Rationale: Chronic critical illness (CCI) results in high patient morbidity and mortality and imposes substantial burdens on families as surrogate decision-makers. Prior research has predominantly focused on families' decisional needs before tracheostomy in the ICU, despite CCI unfolding over weeks to months across multiple care transitions and settings.

Objective: To characterize families' decision-making experiences and reflections along the continuum of CCI, across time and care transitions.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with family decision-makers of patients who received a tracheostomy for persistent respiratory failure after an acute illness, first within two weeks to six months after tracheostomy and again weeks to months later. We analyzed data using inductive and deductive analysis methods.

Results: We interviewed 23 family decision-makers of 19 patients and identified five themes. 1) Tracheostomy is most often presented as a "needed" procedure in the acute setting, leaving families with a sense of little choice and limited awareness of the broader, long-term care trajectory; 2) Several families felt pressured to make a certain decision or judged when their decision opposed the team's recommendation, specifically if they perceived the recommendation as misaligned with the patient's goals; 3) After tracheostomy, families accepted ongoing interventions to reach a post-acute facility, which represented hope for recovery; 4) After transitioning to a post-acute facility, families faced uncertainty about recovery expectations and made ongoing decisions focused on overcoming setbacks amidst the rollercoaster of CCI; 5) The passage of time with CCI made it increasingly difficult for families to remain physically and psychologically present, leading to a growing sense of passivity in decision-making and a loss of control over the patient's journey.

Conclusions: We found critical problems in communication and support throughout the continuum of CCI. While the framing of tracheostomy as a "need" with limited deliberation about long-term implications remains problematic, our findings emphasize that tracheostomy is only one of many decisions families face throughout CCI. Our data suggest shifting the focus from ICU-based 'tracheostomy decision-making' to longitudinal decisional support that extends across time and settings, enabling ongoing reassessment and decision-making based on the patient's evolving trajectory. Word Count: 343/350 Primary Source of Funding: T32 HL 007563 (ACM).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信