乳房手术培训有哪些强制性改变?法国外科学会和国际老年学会的国际调查和建议。

IF 1.7 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Tolga Ozmen, Caroline Bouche, Megane Buttignol, Bolivar Arboleda-Osorio, Mauricio Magalhaes Costa, Henry Coudane, Darius Dian, Xishan Hao, Shigeru Imoto, Olivier Jardé, Hubert Johanet, Esther Meka, Alexander Mundinger, Ruben Orda, Vahit Ozmen, Tadeusz Pienkowski, Schlomo Schneebaum, Charlotte Vaysse, Susie Brousse, Atilla Soran, Carole Mathelin
{"title":"乳房手术培训有哪些强制性改变?法国外科学会和国际老年学会的国际调查和建议。","authors":"Tolga Ozmen, Caroline Bouche, Megane Buttignol, Bolivar Arboleda-Osorio, Mauricio Magalhaes Costa, Henry Coudane, Darius Dian, Xishan Hao, Shigeru Imoto, Olivier Jardé, Hubert Johanet, Esther Meka, Alexander Mundinger, Ruben Orda, Vahit Ozmen, Tadeusz Pienkowski, Schlomo Schneebaum, Charlotte Vaysse, Susie Brousse, Atilla Soran, Carole Mathelin","doi":"10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2025.2025-3-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Breast cancer management has significantly evolved, particularly in surgical techniques, but breast surgery training remains unstandardized worldwide. This study, promoted by the Senologic International Society (SIS) and the French National Academy of Surgery (FNAS) aimed to evaluate training variability in the world and to provide ten recommendations to improve breast surgery training.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A 32-question electronic survey was sent between July-August 2023 to the SIS and FNAS network, covering personal experience, training practices, accreditation programs, and fellowship requirements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 121 breast specialists from 42 countries participated, including mainly general surgeons (56%) and gynecologists (23%). Most respondents (66%) had over 15 years of experience, and 75% were male. While 50% reported that breast surgery fellowships were not mandatory, countries with requirements often stipulated a one or two-year experience and a minimum cases number. Multidisciplinary training was often lacking, with only half of countries requiring rotations in radiology, oncology, or pathology. Disparities in training quality and accreditation were evident, particularly in regions without formal breast surgery programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-volume centers and specialized surgeons consistently demonstrated improved outcomes, including lower mortality and recurrence rates for patients treated for breast cancer. Rising breast cancer incidence, combined with advances in surgical and multidisciplinary care, highlights the urgency for standardized training. Evidence shows that structured programs with volume thresholds, multidisciplinary approach, and modern surgical techniques improve patient survival and satisfaction. The survey underscores the need for international guidelines to ensure equitable, high-quality care. SIS and FNAS recommend a standardized breast surgery education framework with ten actionable proposals to address disparities, optimize training, and enhance global care quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":93996,"journal":{"name":"European journal of breast health","volume":" ","pages":"200-210"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12180090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Changes are Mandatory in Breast Surgery Training? An International Survey and Recommendations of the French Academy of Surgery and the Senologic International Society.\",\"authors\":\"Tolga Ozmen, Caroline Bouche, Megane Buttignol, Bolivar Arboleda-Osorio, Mauricio Magalhaes Costa, Henry Coudane, Darius Dian, Xishan Hao, Shigeru Imoto, Olivier Jardé, Hubert Johanet, Esther Meka, Alexander Mundinger, Ruben Orda, Vahit Ozmen, Tadeusz Pienkowski, Schlomo Schneebaum, Charlotte Vaysse, Susie Brousse, Atilla Soran, Carole Mathelin\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2025.2025-3-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Breast cancer management has significantly evolved, particularly in surgical techniques, but breast surgery training remains unstandardized worldwide. This study, promoted by the Senologic International Society (SIS) and the French National Academy of Surgery (FNAS) aimed to evaluate training variability in the world and to provide ten recommendations to improve breast surgery training.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A 32-question electronic survey was sent between July-August 2023 to the SIS and FNAS network, covering personal experience, training practices, accreditation programs, and fellowship requirements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 121 breast specialists from 42 countries participated, including mainly general surgeons (56%) and gynecologists (23%). Most respondents (66%) had over 15 years of experience, and 75% were male. While 50% reported that breast surgery fellowships were not mandatory, countries with requirements often stipulated a one or two-year experience and a minimum cases number. Multidisciplinary training was often lacking, with only half of countries requiring rotations in radiology, oncology, or pathology. Disparities in training quality and accreditation were evident, particularly in regions without formal breast surgery programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-volume centers and specialized surgeons consistently demonstrated improved outcomes, including lower mortality and recurrence rates for patients treated for breast cancer. Rising breast cancer incidence, combined with advances in surgical and multidisciplinary care, highlights the urgency for standardized training. Evidence shows that structured programs with volume thresholds, multidisciplinary approach, and modern surgical techniques improve patient survival and satisfaction. The survey underscores the need for international guidelines to ensure equitable, high-quality care. SIS and FNAS recommend a standardized breast surgery education framework with ten actionable proposals to address disparities, optimize training, and enhance global care quality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of breast health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"200-210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12180090/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of breast health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2025.2025-3-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of breast health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2025.2025-3-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:乳腺癌的管理有了显著的发展,特别是在手术技术方面,但乳房手术培训在世界范围内仍然不标准化。本研究由国际生理学会(SIS)和法国国家外科学会(FNAS)共同推动,旨在评估世界范围内培训的可变性,并提出十条改进乳房外科培训的建议。材料和方法:在2023年7月至8月期间向SIS和FNAS网络发送了一份包含32个问题的电子调查,涵盖个人经历、培训实践、认证计划和奖学金要求。结果:共有来自42个国家的121名乳腺专家参与,主要包括普通外科医生(56%)和妇科医生(23%)。大多数受访者(66%)有超过15年的工作经验,75%是男性。虽然50%的受访者表示,乳房手术研究金不是强制性的,但有要求的国家通常规定了一年或两年的经验和最低病例数。往往缺乏多学科培训,只有一半的国家要求在放射学、肿瘤学或病理学方面进行轮岗。培训质量和认证方面的差异很明显,特别是在没有正式乳房手术项目的地区。结论:大容量中心和专业外科医生一致证明了改善的结果,包括降低乳腺癌患者的死亡率和复发率。乳腺癌发病率的上升,加上外科和多学科护理的进步,凸显了标准化培训的紧迫性。有证据表明,采用容积阈值、多学科方法和现代外科技术的结构化方案可提高患者的生存率和满意度。调查强调需要制定国际准则,以确保公平、高质量的医疗服务。SIS和FNAS推荐了一个标准化的乳房外科教育框架,其中包含十项可操作的建议,以解决差距,优化培训,提高全球护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

What Changes are Mandatory in Breast Surgery Training? An International Survey and Recommendations of the French Academy of Surgery and the Senologic International Society.

What Changes are Mandatory in Breast Surgery Training? An International Survey and Recommendations of the French Academy of Surgery and the Senologic International Society.

What Changes are Mandatory in Breast Surgery Training? An International Survey and Recommendations of the French Academy of Surgery and the Senologic International Society.

Objective: Breast cancer management has significantly evolved, particularly in surgical techniques, but breast surgery training remains unstandardized worldwide. This study, promoted by the Senologic International Society (SIS) and the French National Academy of Surgery (FNAS) aimed to evaluate training variability in the world and to provide ten recommendations to improve breast surgery training.

Materials and methods: A 32-question electronic survey was sent between July-August 2023 to the SIS and FNAS network, covering personal experience, training practices, accreditation programs, and fellowship requirements.

Results: A total of 121 breast specialists from 42 countries participated, including mainly general surgeons (56%) and gynecologists (23%). Most respondents (66%) had over 15 years of experience, and 75% were male. While 50% reported that breast surgery fellowships were not mandatory, countries with requirements often stipulated a one or two-year experience and a minimum cases number. Multidisciplinary training was often lacking, with only half of countries requiring rotations in radiology, oncology, or pathology. Disparities in training quality and accreditation were evident, particularly in regions without formal breast surgery programs.

Conclusion: High-volume centers and specialized surgeons consistently demonstrated improved outcomes, including lower mortality and recurrence rates for patients treated for breast cancer. Rising breast cancer incidence, combined with advances in surgical and multidisciplinary care, highlights the urgency for standardized training. Evidence shows that structured programs with volume thresholds, multidisciplinary approach, and modern surgical techniques improve patient survival and satisfaction. The survey underscores the need for international guidelines to ensure equitable, high-quality care. SIS and FNAS recommend a standardized breast surgery education framework with ten actionable proposals to address disparities, optimize training, and enhance global care quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信