口腔白斑、增殖性白斑和口腔鳞状细胞癌唾液样品中口腔微生物组的比较分析。

IF 3 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Frontiers in oral health Pub Date : 2025-05-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/froh.2025.1600090
Rossella Intini, Sol Balsells, Leticia Bagan, Giulio Fortuna, Herve Sroussi, Jose Bagan
{"title":"口腔白斑、增殖性白斑和口腔鳞状细胞癌唾液样品中口腔微生物组的比较分析。","authors":"Rossella Intini, Sol Balsells, Leticia Bagan, Giulio Fortuna, Herve Sroussi, Jose Bagan","doi":"10.3389/froh.2025.1600090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs), including conventional leukoplakia (OL) and proliferative verrucous leukoplakia (PVL), have distinct risks of progression to oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). A role of the oral microbiome in this transformation is increasingly recognized, but its contribution remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to analyze and compare the oral microbiota in patients with OL, PVL, and OSCC using 16S rRNA gene sequencing of saliva samples to identify microbial signatures associated with disease progression and to uncover potential biomarkers that would justify an aggressive treatment of OPMDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-six subjects with OPMDs were enrolled, comprising OL (<i>n</i> = 10), PVL (<i>n</i> = 28), and OSCC (<i>n</i> = 28). Saliva samples were collected, and DNA was extracted. The V3-V4 regions of the 16S rRNA gene were sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Bioinformatic analyses, including diversity assessments and taxonomic classification with the SILVA v138 database, were performed using QIIME2. Alpha diversity was evaluated with Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson indices, while beta diversity was assessed using Bray-Curtis and Jaccard distances.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PVL exhibited the highest species richness, followed by OL, with OSCC showing the lowest diversity. While alpha diversity differences among the groups were not statistically significant (<i>p</i> > 0.05), beta diversity revealed distinct microbial community structures between OL and both PVL and OSCC (<i>p</i> < 0.05), but not between PVL and OSCC. At the phylum level, <i>Firmicutes</i> predominated across all groups, with significantly higher <i>Actinobacteriota</i> levels in OL (<i>p</i> = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Distinct microbial patterns differentiate OL from PVL and OSCC, with OL being different from PVL and OSCC, suggesting progressive microbial dysbiosis in malignant transformation. These findings support the potential of oral microbiome profiling as a non-invasive diagnostic and prognostic tool in oral oncology and highlight the need for longitudinal studies to establish causal relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":94016,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in oral health","volume":"6 ","pages":"1600090"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12116504/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of oral microbiome in saliva samples of oral leukoplakia, proliferative leukoplakia and oral squamous cell carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Rossella Intini, Sol Balsells, Leticia Bagan, Giulio Fortuna, Herve Sroussi, Jose Bagan\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/froh.2025.1600090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs), including conventional leukoplakia (OL) and proliferative verrucous leukoplakia (PVL), have distinct risks of progression to oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). A role of the oral microbiome in this transformation is increasingly recognized, but its contribution remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to analyze and compare the oral microbiota in patients with OL, PVL, and OSCC using 16S rRNA gene sequencing of saliva samples to identify microbial signatures associated with disease progression and to uncover potential biomarkers that would justify an aggressive treatment of OPMDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-six subjects with OPMDs were enrolled, comprising OL (<i>n</i> = 10), PVL (<i>n</i> = 28), and OSCC (<i>n</i> = 28). Saliva samples were collected, and DNA was extracted. The V3-V4 regions of the 16S rRNA gene were sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Bioinformatic analyses, including diversity assessments and taxonomic classification with the SILVA v138 database, were performed using QIIME2. Alpha diversity was evaluated with Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson indices, while beta diversity was assessed using Bray-Curtis and Jaccard distances.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PVL exhibited the highest species richness, followed by OL, with OSCC showing the lowest diversity. While alpha diversity differences among the groups were not statistically significant (<i>p</i> > 0.05), beta diversity revealed distinct microbial community structures between OL and both PVL and OSCC (<i>p</i> < 0.05), but not between PVL and OSCC. At the phylum level, <i>Firmicutes</i> predominated across all groups, with significantly higher <i>Actinobacteriota</i> levels in OL (<i>p</i> = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Distinct microbial patterns differentiate OL from PVL and OSCC, with OL being different from PVL and OSCC, suggesting progressive microbial dysbiosis in malignant transformation. These findings support the potential of oral microbiome profiling as a non-invasive diagnostic and prognostic tool in oral oncology and highlight the need for longitudinal studies to establish causal relationships.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in oral health\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"1600090\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12116504/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in oral health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2025.1600090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in oral health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2025.1600090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:口腔潜在恶性疾病(OPMDs),包括常规白斑(OL)和增殖性疣状白斑(PVL),有明显的发展为口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)的风险。口腔微生物组在这一转变中的作用越来越被认识到,但其贡献仍不清楚。目的:本研究旨在通过唾液样本的16S rRNA基因测序来分析和比较OL、PVL和OSCC患者的口腔微生物群,以确定与疾病进展相关的微生物特征,并揭示潜在的生物标志物,为OPMDs的积极治疗提供依据。方法:纳入66例opmd患者,包括OL (n = 10)、PVL (n = 28)和OSCC (n = 28)。收集唾液样本,提取DNA。使用Illumina MiSeq平台对16S rRNA基因的V3-V4区域进行测序。使用QIIME2进行生物信息学分析,包括多样性评估和SILVA v138数据库的分类分类。采用Chao1、Shannon和Simpson指数评价α多样性,采用Bray-Curtis和Jaccard距离评价β多样性。结果:PVL物种丰富度最高,OL次之,OSCC最低。α多样性组间差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05), β多样性显示OL与PVL和OSCC之间存在明显的微生物群落结构差异(p厚壁菌门在所有组中占主导地位,OL中的放线菌门水平显著高于OL (p = 0.002)。结论:OL与PVL和OSCC之间存在明显的微生物模式差异,且OL与PVL和OSCC之间存在差异,提示恶性转化过程中微生物生态失调的进行性发展。这些发现支持了口腔微生物组分析作为口腔肿瘤学非侵入性诊断和预后工具的潜力,并强调了纵向研究建立因果关系的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of oral microbiome in saliva samples of oral leukoplakia, proliferative leukoplakia and oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Background: Oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs), including conventional leukoplakia (OL) and proliferative verrucous leukoplakia (PVL), have distinct risks of progression to oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). A role of the oral microbiome in this transformation is increasingly recognized, but its contribution remains unclear.

Objective: This study aimed to analyze and compare the oral microbiota in patients with OL, PVL, and OSCC using 16S rRNA gene sequencing of saliva samples to identify microbial signatures associated with disease progression and to uncover potential biomarkers that would justify an aggressive treatment of OPMDs.

Methods: Sixty-six subjects with OPMDs were enrolled, comprising OL (n = 10), PVL (n = 28), and OSCC (n = 28). Saliva samples were collected, and DNA was extracted. The V3-V4 regions of the 16S rRNA gene were sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Bioinformatic analyses, including diversity assessments and taxonomic classification with the SILVA v138 database, were performed using QIIME2. Alpha diversity was evaluated with Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson indices, while beta diversity was assessed using Bray-Curtis and Jaccard distances.

Results: PVL exhibited the highest species richness, followed by OL, with OSCC showing the lowest diversity. While alpha diversity differences among the groups were not statistically significant (p > 0.05), beta diversity revealed distinct microbial community structures between OL and both PVL and OSCC (p < 0.05), but not between PVL and OSCC. At the phylum level, Firmicutes predominated across all groups, with significantly higher Actinobacteriota levels in OL (p = 0.002).

Conclusion: Distinct microbial patterns differentiate OL from PVL and OSCC, with OL being different from PVL and OSCC, suggesting progressive microbial dysbiosis in malignant transformation. These findings support the potential of oral microbiome profiling as a non-invasive diagnostic and prognostic tool in oral oncology and highlight the need for longitudinal studies to establish causal relationships.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信