急诊科插管患者与重症监护病房患者的镇静做法比较。

Critical care science Pub Date : 2025-05-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62675/2965-2774.20250247
Jariya Sereeyotin, Christopher Yarnell, Sangeeta Mehta
{"title":"急诊科插管患者与重症监护病房患者的镇静做法比较。","authors":"Jariya Sereeyotin, Christopher Yarnell, Sangeeta Mehta","doi":"10.62675/2965-2774.20250247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare sedation management during and after intubation in the emergency department with that in the intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of adults who were intubated in the emergency department or intensive care unit and who received mechanical ventilation between January 2018 and February 2022. We collected data from electronic medical records. The primary outcome was the duration from intubation to the first documentation of light sedation, which was defined as a Sedation Agitation Scale score of 3 - 4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 264 patients, 95 (36%) of whom were intubated in the emergency department and 169 (64%) in the intensive care unit. With respect to the anesthetic agents used for intubation, ketamine was the most frequently used drug in the emergency department and was used more frequently than in the intensive care unit (61% versus 40%; p = 0.001). Propofol was the predominant sedative used in the intensive care unit, with a higher prevalence than in the emergency department (50% versus 33%; p = 0.01). Additionally, benzodiazepines and fentanyl were more frequently used in the intensive care unit (39% versus 6%; p < 0.001 and 68% versus 9.5%; p < 0.001, respectively). Within 24 hours after intubation, 68% (65/95) of the emergency department patients and 82% (138/169) of the patients intubated in the intensive care unit achieved light sedation, with median durations of 13.5 hours and 10.5 hours, respectively. Patients who were intubated in the emergency department were less likely to achieve light sedation at 24 hours (adjusted hazard ratio 0.64; p = 0.04; 95%CI, 0.42 - 0.97).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with intensive care unit patients, critically ill patients who were intubated in the emergency department are at risk of deeper sedation and a longer time to achieve light sedation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":"37 ","pages":"e20250247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12094695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sedation practices in patients intubated in the emergency department compared with those in patients in the intensive care unit.\",\"authors\":\"Jariya Sereeyotin, Christopher Yarnell, Sangeeta Mehta\",\"doi\":\"10.62675/2965-2774.20250247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare sedation management during and after intubation in the emergency department with that in the intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of adults who were intubated in the emergency department or intensive care unit and who received mechanical ventilation between January 2018 and February 2022. We collected data from electronic medical records. The primary outcome was the duration from intubation to the first documentation of light sedation, which was defined as a Sedation Agitation Scale score of 3 - 4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 264 patients, 95 (36%) of whom were intubated in the emergency department and 169 (64%) in the intensive care unit. With respect to the anesthetic agents used for intubation, ketamine was the most frequently used drug in the emergency department and was used more frequently than in the intensive care unit (61% versus 40%; p = 0.001). Propofol was the predominant sedative used in the intensive care unit, with a higher prevalence than in the emergency department (50% versus 33%; p = 0.01). Additionally, benzodiazepines and fentanyl were more frequently used in the intensive care unit (39% versus 6%; p < 0.001 and 68% versus 9.5%; p < 0.001, respectively). Within 24 hours after intubation, 68% (65/95) of the emergency department patients and 82% (138/169) of the patients intubated in the intensive care unit achieved light sedation, with median durations of 13.5 hours and 10.5 hours, respectively. Patients who were intubated in the emergency department were less likely to achieve light sedation at 24 hours (adjusted hazard ratio 0.64; p = 0.04; 95%CI, 0.42 - 0.97).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with intensive care unit patients, critically ill patients who were intubated in the emergency department are at risk of deeper sedation and a longer time to achieve light sedation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care science\",\"volume\":\"37 \",\"pages\":\"e20250247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12094695/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62675/2965-2774.20250247\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62675/2965-2774.20250247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较急诊科与重症监护病房插管期间和插管后的镇静管理。方法:这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,研究对象是2018年1月至2022年2月期间在急诊科或重症监护病房插管并接受机械通气的成年人。我们从电子病历中收集数据。主要观察指标为从插管到首次记录轻度镇静的持续时间,其定义为镇静搅拌量表评分为3 - 4。结果:本研究纳入264例患者,其中95例(36%)在急诊科插管,169例(64%)在重症监护病房插管。关于用于插管的麻醉剂,氯胺酮是急诊科最常用的药物,使用频率高于重症监护病房(61%对40%;P = 0.001)。异丙酚是重症监护室使用的主要镇静剂,其患病率高于急诊科(50%对33%;P = 0.01)。此外,苯二氮卓类药物和芬太尼在重症监护病房的使用频率更高(39%对6%;P < 0.001, 68% vs 9.5%;P < 0.001)。在插管后24小时内,68%(65/95)的急诊科患者和82%(138/169)的重症监护病房插管患者达到轻度镇静,中位持续时间分别为13.5小时和10.5小时。在急诊科插管的患者在24小时内实现轻度镇静的可能性较小(校正风险比0.64;P = 0.04;95%ci, 0.42 - 0.97)。结论:与重症监护病房患者相比,急诊科插管的危重患者存在镇静程度较深、达到轻度镇静所需时间较长的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sedation practices in patients intubated in the emergency department compared with those in patients in the intensive care unit.

Objective: This study aimed to compare sedation management during and after intubation in the emergency department with that in the intensive care unit.

Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of adults who were intubated in the emergency department or intensive care unit and who received mechanical ventilation between January 2018 and February 2022. We collected data from electronic medical records. The primary outcome was the duration from intubation to the first documentation of light sedation, which was defined as a Sedation Agitation Scale score of 3 - 4.

Results: This study included 264 patients, 95 (36%) of whom were intubated in the emergency department and 169 (64%) in the intensive care unit. With respect to the anesthetic agents used for intubation, ketamine was the most frequently used drug in the emergency department and was used more frequently than in the intensive care unit (61% versus 40%; p = 0.001). Propofol was the predominant sedative used in the intensive care unit, with a higher prevalence than in the emergency department (50% versus 33%; p = 0.01). Additionally, benzodiazepines and fentanyl were more frequently used in the intensive care unit (39% versus 6%; p < 0.001 and 68% versus 9.5%; p < 0.001, respectively). Within 24 hours after intubation, 68% (65/95) of the emergency department patients and 82% (138/169) of the patients intubated in the intensive care unit achieved light sedation, with median durations of 13.5 hours and 10.5 hours, respectively. Patients who were intubated in the emergency department were less likely to achieve light sedation at 24 hours (adjusted hazard ratio 0.64; p = 0.04; 95%CI, 0.42 - 0.97).

Conclusion: Compared with intensive care unit patients, critically ill patients who were intubated in the emergency department are at risk of deeper sedation and a longer time to achieve light sedation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信