发展中国家患者权利的各个方面:一项定性研究。

IF 3.1 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Deedat Safeer, Sanduni Wijerathne, Pumudu Weerasekara, Udari Wickramasinghe, Sanidi Edirisinghe, Anuki Hewavithana, Nadeeka Chandraratne, Saroj Jayasinghe
{"title":"发展中国家患者权利的各个方面:一项定性研究。","authors":"Deedat Safeer, Sanduni Wijerathne, Pumudu Weerasekara, Udari Wickramasinghe, Sanidi Edirisinghe, Anuki Hewavithana, Nadeeka Chandraratne, Saroj Jayasinghe","doi":"10.1186/s12910-025-01232-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients' rights are integral to ensuring ethical and humane healthcare delivery. Understanding these rights helps promote patient-centered care and strengthens trust in healthcare systems. Although international frameworks outline patients' rights comprehensively, Sri Lanka lacks specific legislative recognition and public awareness on the topic. This study aims to explore perspectives on patients' rights in Sri Lanka and identify barriers and facilitators to their implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted at the National Hospital of Sri Lanka, involving individual interviews with twenty participants, including patients (n = 16) from diverse backgrounds and healthcare professionals (n = 4). The study used a generic qualitative inquiry using inductive thematic analysis. Open-ended interviews were transcribed, and key themes were identified based on participants' descriptions of their experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study identified several key themes regarding patient rights: access to information and informed consent, respect and dignity, and quality of care. Patients were generally satisfied with the amount of information received, although healthcare providers desired more patient involvement in decision-making. Both patients and healthcare professionals stressed the importance of treating patients with respect and dignity. However, patients showed a tendency to defer to the expertise of doctors, placing less emphasis on informed consent and their own autonomy. Patients also expressed a right to high-quality care but experienced some delays and inefficiencies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study reveals both strengths and weaknesses in the implementation of patient rights within the Sri Lankan healthcare setting. A lack of formal recognition of patient rights and a cultural tendency for patients to trust doctors' judgement over their own autonomy are key findings. This study highlights the need to improve patient empowerment and education to promote autonomy and shared decision making in their own care. Future studies should include larger, multi-center samples, to gain a more comprehensive understanding of patient rights in Sri Lanka. Importantly, this study advocates for national policy reform, including the development and adoption of an officially recognized Patient Rights Charter.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"26 1","pages":"69"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12121050/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aspects of patient rights in a developing country: a qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Deedat Safeer, Sanduni Wijerathne, Pumudu Weerasekara, Udari Wickramasinghe, Sanidi Edirisinghe, Anuki Hewavithana, Nadeeka Chandraratne, Saroj Jayasinghe\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12910-025-01232-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients' rights are integral to ensuring ethical and humane healthcare delivery. Understanding these rights helps promote patient-centered care and strengthens trust in healthcare systems. Although international frameworks outline patients' rights comprehensively, Sri Lanka lacks specific legislative recognition and public awareness on the topic. This study aims to explore perspectives on patients' rights in Sri Lanka and identify barriers and facilitators to their implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted at the National Hospital of Sri Lanka, involving individual interviews with twenty participants, including patients (n = 16) from diverse backgrounds and healthcare professionals (n = 4). The study used a generic qualitative inquiry using inductive thematic analysis. Open-ended interviews were transcribed, and key themes were identified based on participants' descriptions of their experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study identified several key themes regarding patient rights: access to information and informed consent, respect and dignity, and quality of care. Patients were generally satisfied with the amount of information received, although healthcare providers desired more patient involvement in decision-making. Both patients and healthcare professionals stressed the importance of treating patients with respect and dignity. However, patients showed a tendency to defer to the expertise of doctors, placing less emphasis on informed consent and their own autonomy. Patients also expressed a right to high-quality care but experienced some delays and inefficiencies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study reveals both strengths and weaknesses in the implementation of patient rights within the Sri Lankan healthcare setting. A lack of formal recognition of patient rights and a cultural tendency for patients to trust doctors' judgement over their own autonomy are key findings. This study highlights the need to improve patient empowerment and education to promote autonomy and shared decision making in their own care. Future studies should include larger, multi-center samples, to gain a more comprehensive understanding of patient rights in Sri Lanka. Importantly, this study advocates for national policy reform, including the development and adoption of an officially recognized Patient Rights Charter.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Ethics\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12121050/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01232-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01232-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:患者的权利是不可或缺的,以确保道德和人道的医疗保健服务。了解这些权利有助于促进以患者为中心的护理,并加强对医疗保健系统的信任。虽然国际框架全面概述了患者的权利,但斯里兰卡缺乏对该主题的具体立法承认和公众意识。本研究旨在探讨斯里兰卡患者权利的观点,并确定其实施的障碍和促进因素。方法:在斯里兰卡国立医院进行了一项定性研究,涉及对20名参与者的个人访谈,包括来自不同背景的患者(n = 16)和医疗保健专业人员(n = 4)。本研究采用归纳专题分析的一般定性调查方法。开放式访谈被记录下来,并根据参与者对其经历的描述确定关键主题。结果:该研究确定了关于患者权利的几个关键主题:获取信息和知情同意、尊重和尊严以及护理质量。患者通常对收到的信息量感到满意,尽管医疗保健提供者希望患者更多地参与决策。患者和保健专业人员都强调了以尊重和尊严对待患者的重要性。然而,患者表现出服从医生专业知识的倾向,不太重视知情同意和自己的自主权。患者也表达了获得高质量护理的权利,但经历了一些延误和低效率。结论:本研究揭示了斯里兰卡医疗保健环境中实施患者权利的优势和劣势。缺乏对患者权利的正式承认,以及患者相信医生的判断而不是自己的自主权的文化倾向是主要的发现。这项研究强调需要提高病人的权力和教育,以促进自主和共同决策在自己的护理。未来的研究应该包括更大的、多中心的样本,以更全面地了解斯里兰卡的患者权利。重要的是,本研究倡导国家政策改革,包括制定和采用官方认可的《患者权利宪章》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aspects of patient rights in a developing country: a qualitative study.

Background: Patients' rights are integral to ensuring ethical and humane healthcare delivery. Understanding these rights helps promote patient-centered care and strengthens trust in healthcare systems. Although international frameworks outline patients' rights comprehensively, Sri Lanka lacks specific legislative recognition and public awareness on the topic. This study aims to explore perspectives on patients' rights in Sri Lanka and identify barriers and facilitators to their implementation.

Methods: A qualitative study was conducted at the National Hospital of Sri Lanka, involving individual interviews with twenty participants, including patients (n = 16) from diverse backgrounds and healthcare professionals (n = 4). The study used a generic qualitative inquiry using inductive thematic analysis. Open-ended interviews were transcribed, and key themes were identified based on participants' descriptions of their experiences.

Results: The study identified several key themes regarding patient rights: access to information and informed consent, respect and dignity, and quality of care. Patients were generally satisfied with the amount of information received, although healthcare providers desired more patient involvement in decision-making. Both patients and healthcare professionals stressed the importance of treating patients with respect and dignity. However, patients showed a tendency to defer to the expertise of doctors, placing less emphasis on informed consent and their own autonomy. Patients also expressed a right to high-quality care but experienced some delays and inefficiencies.

Conclusions: This study reveals both strengths and weaknesses in the implementation of patient rights within the Sri Lankan healthcare setting. A lack of formal recognition of patient rights and a cultural tendency for patients to trust doctors' judgement over their own autonomy are key findings. This study highlights the need to improve patient empowerment and education to promote autonomy and shared decision making in their own care. Future studies should include larger, multi-center samples, to gain a more comprehensive understanding of patient rights in Sri Lanka. Importantly, this study advocates for national policy reform, including the development and adoption of an officially recognized Patient Rights Charter.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Ethics
BMC Medical Ethics MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Ethics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信