虚弱影响危重患者的临床结果:PalMuSIC研究的事后分析。

Critical care science Pub Date : 2025-05-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62675/2965-2774.20250229
Ana Mestre, Rodrigo Afonso, André Ferreira-Simões, Iuri Correia, João Gonçalves Pereira
{"title":"虚弱影响危重患者的临床结果:PalMuSIC研究的事后分析。","authors":"Ana Mestre, Rodrigo Afonso, André Ferreira-Simões, Iuri Correia, João Gonçalves Pereira","doi":"10.62675/2965-2774.20250229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Frailty is a multidimensional syndrome characterized by diminished physiological reserve, increasing the risk of adverse outcomes, particularly in intensive care unit patients. The Clinical Frailty Scale, ranging from 1 (nonfrail) to 9 (terminally ill), is widely used to quantify frailty. This post hoc analysis of the Palliative Multicenter Study in Intensive Care (PalMuSIC) assesses the impact of frailty and clinical severity on short- and long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This subanalysis involved 23 Portuguese intensive care units and 335 patients. Patients admitted between March 1 and May 15, 2019, aged ≥ 18 years, and hospitalized for > 24 hours in the intensive care unit were eligible. The severity of illness was assessed using SAPS II, and frailty was assessed using the clinical frailty scale, which was recorded by a nurse and a doctor in charge. Patients were classified as frail (clinical frailty scale score ≥ 5), prefrail (clinical frailty scale score = 4), or nonfrail (clinical frailty scale score < 4). The outcomes measured included intensive care unit and hospital LOS (length of stay), need for organ support, infections, mortality at hospital discharge and mortality at 6 months post discharge. We divided the population in half according to the length of their intensive care unit stay to evaluate a possible interaction between intensive care unit length of stay and frailty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 63.2 years, and 66% were male. The mean SAPS II score was 41.8. Frailty was observed in 23.0% of the patients. Frail patients had higher hospital mortality (39.0% frail patients versus 28.2% prefrail patients versus 11.8% nonfrail patients) and 6-month mortality (frail 49.4% frail patients versus 30.6% prefrail patients versus 15.6% nonfrail patients). Patients with longer intensive care unit stays had higher 6-month mortality rates than did those with shorter intensive care unit stays did, which resulted in more frail patients: odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 3.1 (1.2 - 7.8) versus odds ratio 1.8 (0.9 - 4.0) in nonfrail patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Frailty may significantly impact hospital and 6-month mortality. In our cohort, a longer intensive care unit length of stay was associated with worse long-term outcomes, especially in frail patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":"37 ","pages":"e20250229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12094690/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frailty influences clinical outcomes in critical patients: a post hoc analysis of the PalMuSIC study.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Mestre, Rodrigo Afonso, André Ferreira-Simões, Iuri Correia, João Gonçalves Pereira\",\"doi\":\"10.62675/2965-2774.20250229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Frailty is a multidimensional syndrome characterized by diminished physiological reserve, increasing the risk of adverse outcomes, particularly in intensive care unit patients. The Clinical Frailty Scale, ranging from 1 (nonfrail) to 9 (terminally ill), is widely used to quantify frailty. This post hoc analysis of the Palliative Multicenter Study in Intensive Care (PalMuSIC) assesses the impact of frailty and clinical severity on short- and long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This subanalysis involved 23 Portuguese intensive care units and 335 patients. Patients admitted between March 1 and May 15, 2019, aged ≥ 18 years, and hospitalized for > 24 hours in the intensive care unit were eligible. The severity of illness was assessed using SAPS II, and frailty was assessed using the clinical frailty scale, which was recorded by a nurse and a doctor in charge. Patients were classified as frail (clinical frailty scale score ≥ 5), prefrail (clinical frailty scale score = 4), or nonfrail (clinical frailty scale score < 4). The outcomes measured included intensive care unit and hospital LOS (length of stay), need for organ support, infections, mortality at hospital discharge and mortality at 6 months post discharge. We divided the population in half according to the length of their intensive care unit stay to evaluate a possible interaction between intensive care unit length of stay and frailty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 63.2 years, and 66% were male. The mean SAPS II score was 41.8. Frailty was observed in 23.0% of the patients. Frail patients had higher hospital mortality (39.0% frail patients versus 28.2% prefrail patients versus 11.8% nonfrail patients) and 6-month mortality (frail 49.4% frail patients versus 30.6% prefrail patients versus 15.6% nonfrail patients). Patients with longer intensive care unit stays had higher 6-month mortality rates than did those with shorter intensive care unit stays did, which resulted in more frail patients: odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 3.1 (1.2 - 7.8) versus odds ratio 1.8 (0.9 - 4.0) in nonfrail patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Frailty may significantly impact hospital and 6-month mortality. In our cohort, a longer intensive care unit length of stay was associated with worse long-term outcomes, especially in frail patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care science\",\"volume\":\"37 \",\"pages\":\"e20250229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12094690/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62675/2965-2774.20250229\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62675/2965-2774.20250229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:虚弱是一种以生理储备减少为特征的多维综合征,增加了不良后果的风险,特别是在重症监护病房患者中。临床虚弱量表,范围从1(非虚弱)到9(绝症),被广泛用于量化虚弱。这是一项针对重症监护室缓和多中心研究(PalMuSIC)的事后分析,评估了虚弱和临床严重程度对短期和长期结果的影响。方法:该亚分析涉及23个葡萄牙重症监护病房和335名患者。2019年3月1日至5月15日期间入院的患者,年龄≥18岁,在重症监护病房住院bbbb24小时。病情严重程度采用SAPS II评估,虚弱程度采用临床虚弱量表评估,由一名护士和一名主治医生记录。患者分为虚弱(临床虚弱量表评分≥5分)、虚弱前期(临床虚弱量表评分= 4分)和非虚弱(临床虚弱量表评分< 4分)。测量的结果包括重症监护病房和医院LOS(住院时间)、器官支持需求、感染、出院时死亡率和出院后6个月死亡率。我们根据重症监护病房的住院时间将人群分成两半,以评估重症监护病房的住院时间与虚弱之间可能的相互作用。结果:平均年龄63.2岁,男性占66%。SAPS II平均评分为41.8分。23.0%的患者出现虚弱。体弱患者有较高的住院死亡率(体弱患者39.0%,体弱前期患者28.2%,非体弱患者11.8%)和6个月死亡率(体弱患者49.4%,体弱前期患者30.6%,非体弱患者15.6%)。重症监护病房住院时间较长的患者6个月死亡率高于重症监护病房住院时间较短的患者,这导致更多虚弱患者:非虚弱患者的优势比(95%置信区间)为3.1(1.2 - 7.8),优势比为1.8(0.9 - 4.0)。结论:虚弱对住院死亡率和6个月死亡率有显著影响。在我们的队列中,重症监护病房的住院时间越长,长期预后越差,尤其是体弱患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frailty influences clinical outcomes in critical patients: a post hoc analysis of the PalMuSIC study.

Objective: Frailty is a multidimensional syndrome characterized by diminished physiological reserve, increasing the risk of adverse outcomes, particularly in intensive care unit patients. The Clinical Frailty Scale, ranging from 1 (nonfrail) to 9 (terminally ill), is widely used to quantify frailty. This post hoc analysis of the Palliative Multicenter Study in Intensive Care (PalMuSIC) assesses the impact of frailty and clinical severity on short- and long-term outcomes.

Methods: This subanalysis involved 23 Portuguese intensive care units and 335 patients. Patients admitted between March 1 and May 15, 2019, aged ≥ 18 years, and hospitalized for > 24 hours in the intensive care unit were eligible. The severity of illness was assessed using SAPS II, and frailty was assessed using the clinical frailty scale, which was recorded by a nurse and a doctor in charge. Patients were classified as frail (clinical frailty scale score ≥ 5), prefrail (clinical frailty scale score = 4), or nonfrail (clinical frailty scale score < 4). The outcomes measured included intensive care unit and hospital LOS (length of stay), need for organ support, infections, mortality at hospital discharge and mortality at 6 months post discharge. We divided the population in half according to the length of their intensive care unit stay to evaluate a possible interaction between intensive care unit length of stay and frailty.

Results: The mean age was 63.2 years, and 66% were male. The mean SAPS II score was 41.8. Frailty was observed in 23.0% of the patients. Frail patients had higher hospital mortality (39.0% frail patients versus 28.2% prefrail patients versus 11.8% nonfrail patients) and 6-month mortality (frail 49.4% frail patients versus 30.6% prefrail patients versus 15.6% nonfrail patients). Patients with longer intensive care unit stays had higher 6-month mortality rates than did those with shorter intensive care unit stays did, which resulted in more frail patients: odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 3.1 (1.2 - 7.8) versus odds ratio 1.8 (0.9 - 4.0) in nonfrail patients.

Conclusion: Frailty may significantly impact hospital and 6-month mortality. In our cohort, a longer intensive care unit length of stay was associated with worse long-term outcomes, especially in frail patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信