社区参与的早期家访研究:同行评议文献的范围综述。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Allison West, Diana Eldreth Chute, Jane Daniels, Kelly M Bower
{"title":"社区参与的早期家访研究:同行评议文献的范围综述。","authors":"Allison West, Diana Eldreth Chute, Jane Daniels, Kelly M Bower","doi":"10.1007/s11121-025-01812-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Community-engaged research (CEnR) has potential to advance early home visiting and improve health outcomes for all families by ensuring that research aligns with the needs of the community, methods and procedures are acceptable and accessible, and findings are interpreted accurately and disseminated effectively. We conducted a scoping review to characterize the extent and nature of CEnR in peer-reviewed literature relevant to early home visiting. We searched five scholarly databases for literature published since 2010 describing engagement of community members in research involving evidence-based early home visiting programs. We extracted data on each study's characteristics, community collaborators, and factors, outcomes, and measures of community engagement. We then coded each study for 16 community engagement components and characterized each study along an established continuum of CEnR. Fourteen articles met all eligibility criteria and were characterized as involving community consultation, community participation, or community-based participatory research. No articles were characterized as community initiated or driven. No studies assessed the impact of community engagement, and only two described barriers or facilitators to engagement. CEnR may be underutilized and underreported in peer-reviewed home visiting research. Findings highlight opportunities to build motivation and capacity for CEnR, transparency in CEnR reporting, and evaluation of CEnR process and impacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48268,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community-Engaged Research in Early Home Visiting: A Scoping Review of Peer-Reviewed Literature.\",\"authors\":\"Allison West, Diana Eldreth Chute, Jane Daniels, Kelly M Bower\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11121-025-01812-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Community-engaged research (CEnR) has potential to advance early home visiting and improve health outcomes for all families by ensuring that research aligns with the needs of the community, methods and procedures are acceptable and accessible, and findings are interpreted accurately and disseminated effectively. We conducted a scoping review to characterize the extent and nature of CEnR in peer-reviewed literature relevant to early home visiting. We searched five scholarly databases for literature published since 2010 describing engagement of community members in research involving evidence-based early home visiting programs. We extracted data on each study's characteristics, community collaborators, and factors, outcomes, and measures of community engagement. We then coded each study for 16 community engagement components and characterized each study along an established continuum of CEnR. Fourteen articles met all eligibility criteria and were characterized as involving community consultation, community participation, or community-based participatory research. No articles were characterized as community initiated or driven. No studies assessed the impact of community engagement, and only two described barriers or facilitators to engagement. CEnR may be underutilized and underreported in peer-reviewed home visiting research. Findings highlight opportunities to build motivation and capacity for CEnR, transparency in CEnR reporting, and evaluation of CEnR process and impacts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prevention Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prevention Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-025-01812-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prevention Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-025-01812-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社区参与研究(CEnR)有可能促进早期家访,并通过确保研究符合社区的需求,方法和程序是可接受和可获得的,以及研究结果得到准确解释和有效传播,改善所有家庭的健康结果。我们进行了一项范围综述,以表征与早期家访相关的同行评议文献中CEnR的程度和性质。我们在五个学术数据库中检索了自2010年以来发表的文献,这些文献描述了社区成员参与基于证据的早期家访项目的研究。我们提取了每项研究的特征、社区合作者、因素、结果和社区参与措施的数据。然后,我们将每个研究编码为16个社区参与组成部分,并根据已建立的CEnR连续体对每个研究进行表征。14篇文章符合所有入选标准,其特征为涉及社区咨询、社区参与或社区参与性研究。没有文章被描述为社区发起或驱动。没有研究评估社区参与的影响,只有两项研究描述了社区参与的障碍或促进因素。在同行评议的家访研究中,cnr可能未被充分利用和低估。研究结果强调了建立CEnR的动力和能力、CEnR报告的透明度以及对CEnR过程和影响的评估的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Community-Engaged Research in Early Home Visiting: A Scoping Review of Peer-Reviewed Literature.

Community-engaged research (CEnR) has potential to advance early home visiting and improve health outcomes for all families by ensuring that research aligns with the needs of the community, methods and procedures are acceptable and accessible, and findings are interpreted accurately and disseminated effectively. We conducted a scoping review to characterize the extent and nature of CEnR in peer-reviewed literature relevant to early home visiting. We searched five scholarly databases for literature published since 2010 describing engagement of community members in research involving evidence-based early home visiting programs. We extracted data on each study's characteristics, community collaborators, and factors, outcomes, and measures of community engagement. We then coded each study for 16 community engagement components and characterized each study along an established continuum of CEnR. Fourteen articles met all eligibility criteria and were characterized as involving community consultation, community participation, or community-based participatory research. No articles were characterized as community initiated or driven. No studies assessed the impact of community engagement, and only two described barriers or facilitators to engagement. CEnR may be underutilized and underreported in peer-reviewed home visiting research. Findings highlight opportunities to build motivation and capacity for CEnR, transparency in CEnR reporting, and evaluation of CEnR process and impacts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prevention Science
Prevention Science PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
11.40%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: Prevention Science is the official publication of the Society for Prevention Research. The Journal serves as an interdisciplinary forum designed to disseminate new developments in the theory, research and practice of prevention. Prevention sciences encompassing etiology, epidemiology and intervention are represented through peer-reviewed original research articles on a variety of health and social problems, including but not limited to substance abuse, mental health, HIV/AIDS, violence, accidents, teenage pregnancy, suicide, delinquency, STD''s, obesity, diet/nutrition, exercise, and chronic illness. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical articles, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, brief reports, replication studies, and papers concerning new developments in methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信