矫正透明矫正器的改良需要与专业经验有关吗?

Q2 Medicine
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics Pub Date : 2025-05-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/2177-6709.30.2.e2524248.oar
Victor de Miranda Ladewig, Kamila de Oliveira Novais Machado, Thaís Maria Freire Fernandes, Renata Rodrigues de Almeida-Pedrin, Paula Vanessa Pedron Oltramari, Márcio Rodrigues de Almeida, Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira Conti
{"title":"矫正透明矫正器的改良需要与专业经验有关吗?","authors":"Victor de Miranda Ladewig, Kamila de Oliveira Novais Machado, Thaís Maria Freire Fernandes, Renata Rodrigues de Almeida-Pedrin, Paula Vanessa Pedron Oltramari, Márcio Rodrigues de Almeida, Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira Conti","doi":"10.1590/2177-6709.30.2.e2524248.oar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess how often orthodontists request additional aligners and correlate this need with professional's experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire was sent by instant messaging app (WhatsApp) to 188 orthodontists who answered it voluntarily. Respondents were grouped by experience, including time of orthodontic training (OT), training with aligners (TA) and number of cases treated with aligners (TC). They were also surveyed about the cases in which they recommend aligners. Chi-square tests were used to analyze associations between experience categories and the need for 1 or 2+ refinements, with a significance level set at 5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At least one refinement was requested in 70.31% of cases. More experienced specialists and those with longer use of aligners requested refinements more often. A second refinement was required in 21.95% of cases, primarily requested by professionals with less experience as specialists and fewer cases treated with aligners. Mild and moderate crowding were the most indicated malocclusions, while extractions and presurgical treatments were the least.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Refinements were needed in most cases treated with aligners. Its need is not related to the lack of experience or knowledge of the technique, being mostly requested by more experienced professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":38720,"journal":{"name":"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"30 2","pages":"e2524248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101830/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the need for refinement sets of orthodontic clear aligners correlate with professional experience?\",\"authors\":\"Victor de Miranda Ladewig, Kamila de Oliveira Novais Machado, Thaís Maria Freire Fernandes, Renata Rodrigues de Almeida-Pedrin, Paula Vanessa Pedron Oltramari, Márcio Rodrigues de Almeida, Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira Conti\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/2177-6709.30.2.e2524248.oar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess how often orthodontists request additional aligners and correlate this need with professional's experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire was sent by instant messaging app (WhatsApp) to 188 orthodontists who answered it voluntarily. Respondents were grouped by experience, including time of orthodontic training (OT), training with aligners (TA) and number of cases treated with aligners (TC). They were also surveyed about the cases in which they recommend aligners. Chi-square tests were used to analyze associations between experience categories and the need for 1 or 2+ refinements, with a significance level set at 5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At least one refinement was requested in 70.31% of cases. More experienced specialists and those with longer use of aligners requested refinements more often. A second refinement was required in 21.95% of cases, primarily requested by professionals with less experience as specialists and fewer cases treated with aligners. Mild and moderate crowding were the most indicated malocclusions, while extractions and presurgical treatments were the least.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Refinements were needed in most cases treated with aligners. Its need is not related to the lack of experience or knowledge of the technique, being mostly requested by more experienced professionals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"30 2\",\"pages\":\"e2524248\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101830/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.30.2.e2524248.oar\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.30.2.e2524248.oar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估正畸医师要求额外矫正器的频率,并将这种需求与专业经验联系起来。方法:通过即时通讯软件(WhatsApp)向188名正畸医师发送问卷,并由其自愿填写。调查对象按经验分组,包括正畸训练时间(OT)、矫正器训练时间(TA)和矫正器治疗病例数(TC)。他们还被调查了他们推荐牙齿矫正器的情况。卡方检验用于分析经验类别与1或2+改进需求之间的关联,显著性水平设为5%。结果:70.31%的病例至少要求一次改进。更有经验的专家和那些长时间使用对准器的人更经常要求改进。21.95%的病例需要第二次改进,主要是由经验较少的专家和较少使用矫正器治疗的病例提出的。轻度和中度拥挤是最明显的错颌,而拔牙和术前治疗是最少的。结论:大多数使用矫正器治疗的病例需要进行矫正。它的需求与缺乏技术经验或知识无关,主要是由更有经验的专业人员要求的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does the need for refinement sets of orthodontic clear aligners correlate with professional experience?

Objective: To assess how often orthodontists request additional aligners and correlate this need with professional's experience.

Methods: A questionnaire was sent by instant messaging app (WhatsApp) to 188 orthodontists who answered it voluntarily. Respondents were grouped by experience, including time of orthodontic training (OT), training with aligners (TA) and number of cases treated with aligners (TC). They were also surveyed about the cases in which they recommend aligners. Chi-square tests were used to analyze associations between experience categories and the need for 1 or 2+ refinements, with a significance level set at 5%.

Results: At least one refinement was requested in 70.31% of cases. More experienced specialists and those with longer use of aligners requested refinements more often. A second refinement was required in 21.95% of cases, primarily requested by professionals with less experience as specialists and fewer cases treated with aligners. Mild and moderate crowding were the most indicated malocclusions, while extractions and presurgical treatments were the least.

Conclusion: Refinements were needed in most cases treated with aligners. Its need is not related to the lack of experience or knowledge of the technique, being mostly requested by more experienced professionals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: The Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics publishes scientific research articles, significant reviews, clinical and technical case reports, brief communications, and other materials related to Orthodontics and Facial Orthopedics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信