锥束计算机断层扫描处方由巴西正畸医生。

Q2 Medicine
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics Pub Date : 2025-05-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/2177-6709.30.2.e252486.oar
Karine Evangelista, Grasielle Di Manoel Caiado, Maria do Carmo Matias Freire, José Valladares-Neto, Maria Alves Garcia Silva
{"title":"锥束计算机断层扫描处方由巴西正畸医生。","authors":"Karine Evangelista, Grasielle Di Manoel Caiado, Maria do Carmo Matias Freire, José Valladares-Neto, Maria Alves Garcia Silva","doi":"10.1590/2177-6709.30.2.e252486.oar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the factors that influence Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging prescription in Brazilian orthodontics practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was performed in 2020 using an online survey sent to all Brazilian orthodontists registered at the Federal Council of Dentistry. The variables were the orthodontists' demographic features and the CBCT prescription in clinical practice. A descriptive and comparative analysis was implemented using frequencies and the chi-square test, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample consisted of 939 respondents. CBCT prescription and the use of guidelines for imaging in orthodontics were confirmed by 81.9% and 52.6% of the sample, respectively. Training for CBCT was reported by 37.0%, mainly during specialization programs in orthodontics (50.0%), about one to five years ago (64.7%), with a duration of 4 to 8 hours (53.4%). The CBCT prescription was indicated predominantly for specific cases (71.0%), and was generally related to impacted teeth (74.7%), orthognathic surgical patients (46.2%), and root resorption (41.9%). The results indicated differences in CBCT prescription between the Brazilian macro-regions, regarding the criteria for prescription, use of guidelines, reasons for not recommending the exam, diagnostic purposes, voxel size, and training for the use of CBCT (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prescription of CBCT was adequate by most Brazilian orthodontists for cases involving impacted teeth, surgical interventions, and root resorption. However, adherence to imaging prescription guidelines was observed in less than 50% of the sample. There is a deficiency in understanding technical parameters and a lack of specific training on CBCT. Disparities were evident among the Brazilian macro-regions, particularly concerning CBCT costs and other variables analyzed.</p>","PeriodicalId":38720,"journal":{"name":"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"30 2","pages":"e252486"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101827/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cone-beam computed tomography prescription by Brazilian orthodontists.\",\"authors\":\"Karine Evangelista, Grasielle Di Manoel Caiado, Maria do Carmo Matias Freire, José Valladares-Neto, Maria Alves Garcia Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/2177-6709.30.2.e252486.oar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the factors that influence Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging prescription in Brazilian orthodontics practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was performed in 2020 using an online survey sent to all Brazilian orthodontists registered at the Federal Council of Dentistry. The variables were the orthodontists' demographic features and the CBCT prescription in clinical practice. A descriptive and comparative analysis was implemented using frequencies and the chi-square test, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample consisted of 939 respondents. CBCT prescription and the use of guidelines for imaging in orthodontics were confirmed by 81.9% and 52.6% of the sample, respectively. Training for CBCT was reported by 37.0%, mainly during specialization programs in orthodontics (50.0%), about one to five years ago (64.7%), with a duration of 4 to 8 hours (53.4%). The CBCT prescription was indicated predominantly for specific cases (71.0%), and was generally related to impacted teeth (74.7%), orthognathic surgical patients (46.2%), and root resorption (41.9%). The results indicated differences in CBCT prescription between the Brazilian macro-regions, regarding the criteria for prescription, use of guidelines, reasons for not recommending the exam, diagnostic purposes, voxel size, and training for the use of CBCT (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prescription of CBCT was adequate by most Brazilian orthodontists for cases involving impacted teeth, surgical interventions, and root resorption. However, adherence to imaging prescription guidelines was observed in less than 50% of the sample. There is a deficiency in understanding technical parameters and a lack of specific training on CBCT. Disparities were evident among the Brazilian macro-regions, particularly concerning CBCT costs and other variables analyzed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"30 2\",\"pages\":\"e252486\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101827/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.30.2.e252486.oar\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.30.2.e252486.oar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨影响巴西正畸临床治疗中锥形束ct (CBCT)成像处方的因素。方法:这项横断面研究于2020年通过在线调查进行,调查对象是在联邦牙科委员会注册的所有巴西正畸医生。变量为正畸医师的人口学特征和临床实践中的CBCT处方。分别使用频率和卡方检验进行描述性分析和比较分析。结果:样本共939人。分别有81.9%和52.6%的样本确认了CBCT处方和正畸成像指南的使用。接受CBCT培训的比例为37.0%,主要是在正畸专业培训期间(50.0%),大约1至5年前(64.7%),培训时间为4至8小时(53.4%)。CBCT处方主要用于特定病例(71.0%),一般与阻生牙(74.7%)、正颌手术患者(46.2%)和牙根吸收(41.9%)有关。结果表明,巴西宏观区域之间的CBCT处方存在差异,包括处方标准、指南的使用、不推荐检查的原因、诊断目的、体素大小和使用CBCT的培训。结论:大多数巴西正畸医生的CBCT处方对于涉及埋伏牙、手术干预和牙根吸收的病例是足够的。然而,在不到50%的样本中观察到遵守成像处方指南。缺乏对技术参数的理解,缺乏关于CBCT的具体培训。巴西宏观区域之间的差异很明显,特别是在CBCT成本和其他分析变量方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cone-beam computed tomography prescription by Brazilian orthodontists.

Objective: To investigate the factors that influence Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging prescription in Brazilian orthodontics practice.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed in 2020 using an online survey sent to all Brazilian orthodontists registered at the Federal Council of Dentistry. The variables were the orthodontists' demographic features and the CBCT prescription in clinical practice. A descriptive and comparative analysis was implemented using frequencies and the chi-square test, respectively.

Results: The sample consisted of 939 respondents. CBCT prescription and the use of guidelines for imaging in orthodontics were confirmed by 81.9% and 52.6% of the sample, respectively. Training for CBCT was reported by 37.0%, mainly during specialization programs in orthodontics (50.0%), about one to five years ago (64.7%), with a duration of 4 to 8 hours (53.4%). The CBCT prescription was indicated predominantly for specific cases (71.0%), and was generally related to impacted teeth (74.7%), orthognathic surgical patients (46.2%), and root resorption (41.9%). The results indicated differences in CBCT prescription between the Brazilian macro-regions, regarding the criteria for prescription, use of guidelines, reasons for not recommending the exam, diagnostic purposes, voxel size, and training for the use of CBCT (p<0.05).

Conclusion: The prescription of CBCT was adequate by most Brazilian orthodontists for cases involving impacted teeth, surgical interventions, and root resorption. However, adherence to imaging prescription guidelines was observed in less than 50% of the sample. There is a deficiency in understanding technical parameters and a lack of specific training on CBCT. Disparities were evident among the Brazilian macro-regions, particularly concerning CBCT costs and other variables analyzed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: The Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics publishes scientific research articles, significant reviews, clinical and technical case reports, brief communications, and other materials related to Orthodontics and Facial Orthopedics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信