社区教育对中国老年人烟草使用的影响。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tobacco Induced Diseases Pub Date : 2025-05-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.18332/tid/204512
Shuang Yu, Yu Liu, Manyi Wang, Yinhe Liang
{"title":"社区教育对中国老年人烟草使用的影响。","authors":"Shuang Yu, Yu Liu, Manyi Wang, Yinhe Liang","doi":"10.18332/tid/204512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Smoking among older adults is increasingly linked to chronic diseases and higher mortality rates. However, the influence of community education on smoking behavior in older adults remains understudied. This research examines the causal effect of community education on smoking habits of older adults in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We use four waves of longitudinal secondary data (2011, 2013, 2015, and 2018) from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), covering adult children aged 22-58 years and their parents aged ≥60 years. A two-stage least squares (2SLS) model is applied to estimate the causal impact of community education on smoking behaviors among older adults, using exposure to the 1986 Compulsory Schooling Law as an instrumental variable. Mechanism and subgroup analyses are further conducted to validate and interpret the estimated effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study includes 26489 adults aged ≥60 years. Community education significantly reduces the likelihood of ever smoking (β= -0.030; 95% CI: -0.048 - -0.012), current smoking (β= -0.020; 95% CI: -0.038 - -0.003), and the number of cigarettes (β= -0.038; 95% CI: -0.075 - -0.001). Mediation analysis indicates that these effects are partially explained by intergenerational support, well-being, and mental health. Among ever smokers, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) score shows the largest indirect effect (β=0.0004; 95% CI: 0.0000-0.0010), accounting for 3.5% of the total effect, followed by contact with children (β= -0.0003; 95% CI: -0.0010 - -0.0000; 1.8%) and optimism (β= -0.0001; 95% CI: -0.0002 - -0.0000; 0.7%). For smoking intensity, CES-D remains the only significant mediator (β=0.0008; 95% CI: -0.0003-0.0010), explaining 4% of the total effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Community education plays a crucial role in lowering smoking rates among older adults. Policymakers should prioritize educational programs and enhance healthcare services to reduce smoking and improve public health outcomes for aging populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":23202,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","volume":"23 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12118464/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of community education on tobacco use among older adults in China.\",\"authors\":\"Shuang Yu, Yu Liu, Manyi Wang, Yinhe Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.18332/tid/204512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Smoking among older adults is increasingly linked to chronic diseases and higher mortality rates. However, the influence of community education on smoking behavior in older adults remains understudied. This research examines the causal effect of community education on smoking habits of older adults in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We use four waves of longitudinal secondary data (2011, 2013, 2015, and 2018) from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), covering adult children aged 22-58 years and their parents aged ≥60 years. A two-stage least squares (2SLS) model is applied to estimate the causal impact of community education on smoking behaviors among older adults, using exposure to the 1986 Compulsory Schooling Law as an instrumental variable. Mechanism and subgroup analyses are further conducted to validate and interpret the estimated effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study includes 26489 adults aged ≥60 years. Community education significantly reduces the likelihood of ever smoking (β= -0.030; 95% CI: -0.048 - -0.012), current smoking (β= -0.020; 95% CI: -0.038 - -0.003), and the number of cigarettes (β= -0.038; 95% CI: -0.075 - -0.001). Mediation analysis indicates that these effects are partially explained by intergenerational support, well-being, and mental health. Among ever smokers, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) score shows the largest indirect effect (β=0.0004; 95% CI: 0.0000-0.0010), accounting for 3.5% of the total effect, followed by contact with children (β= -0.0003; 95% CI: -0.0010 - -0.0000; 1.8%) and optimism (β= -0.0001; 95% CI: -0.0002 - -0.0000; 0.7%). For smoking intensity, CES-D remains the only significant mediator (β=0.0008; 95% CI: -0.0003-0.0010), explaining 4% of the total effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Community education plays a crucial role in lowering smoking rates among older adults. Policymakers should prioritize educational programs and enhance healthcare services to reduce smoking and improve public health outcomes for aging populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tobacco Induced Diseases\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12118464/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tobacco Induced Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/204512\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/204512","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:老年人吸烟与慢性病和高死亡率的关系越来越密切。然而,社区教育对老年人吸烟行为的影响仍未得到充分研究。本研究探讨社区教育对中国老年人吸烟习惯的因果影响。方法:我们使用中国健康与退休纵向研究(CHARLS)的四波纵向二次数据(2011年、2013年、2015年和2018年),涵盖22-58岁的成年子女及其年龄≥60岁的父母。采用两阶段最小二乘(2SLS)模型估计社区教育对老年人吸烟行为的因果影响,将1986年义务教育法的暴露程度作为工具变量。进一步进行机制和亚组分析来验证和解释估计的效果。结果:本研究纳入26489名年龄≥60岁的成年人。社区教育显著降低吸烟的可能性(β= -0.030;95% CI: -0.048 - -0.012),当前吸烟(β= -0.020;95% CI: -0.038 - -0.003),香烟数量(β= -0.038;95% ci: -0.075 - -0.001)。中介分析表明,代际支持、幸福感和心理健康可以部分解释这些影响。在曾经吸烟的人群中,流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)得分显示出最大的间接影响(β=0.0004;95% CI: 0.000 -0.0010),占总效应的3.5%,其次是与儿童接触(β= -0.0003;95% ci: -0.0010 - -0.0000;1.8%)和乐观(β= -0.0001;95% ci: -0.0002 - -0.0000;0.7%)。对于吸烟强度,CES-D仍然是唯一显著的中介(β=0.0008;95% CI: -0.0003-0.0010),解释了总效应的4%。结论:社区教育在降低老年人吸烟率中起着至关重要的作用。决策者应优先考虑教育项目和加强医疗保健服务,以减少吸烟和改善老龄化人口的公共卫生结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effects of community education on tobacco use among older adults in China.

Introduction: Smoking among older adults is increasingly linked to chronic diseases and higher mortality rates. However, the influence of community education on smoking behavior in older adults remains understudied. This research examines the causal effect of community education on smoking habits of older adults in China.

Methods: We use four waves of longitudinal secondary data (2011, 2013, 2015, and 2018) from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), covering adult children aged 22-58 years and their parents aged ≥60 years. A two-stage least squares (2SLS) model is applied to estimate the causal impact of community education on smoking behaviors among older adults, using exposure to the 1986 Compulsory Schooling Law as an instrumental variable. Mechanism and subgroup analyses are further conducted to validate and interpret the estimated effects.

Results: This study includes 26489 adults aged ≥60 years. Community education significantly reduces the likelihood of ever smoking (β= -0.030; 95% CI: -0.048 - -0.012), current smoking (β= -0.020; 95% CI: -0.038 - -0.003), and the number of cigarettes (β= -0.038; 95% CI: -0.075 - -0.001). Mediation analysis indicates that these effects are partially explained by intergenerational support, well-being, and mental health. Among ever smokers, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) score shows the largest indirect effect (β=0.0004; 95% CI: 0.0000-0.0010), accounting for 3.5% of the total effect, followed by contact with children (β= -0.0003; 95% CI: -0.0010 - -0.0000; 1.8%) and optimism (β= -0.0001; 95% CI: -0.0002 - -0.0000; 0.7%). For smoking intensity, CES-D remains the only significant mediator (β=0.0008; 95% CI: -0.0003-0.0010), explaining 4% of the total effect.

Conclusions: Community education plays a crucial role in lowering smoking rates among older adults. Policymakers should prioritize educational programs and enhance healthcare services to reduce smoking and improve public health outcomes for aging populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tobacco Induced Diseases
Tobacco Induced Diseases SUBSTANCE ABUSE-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tobacco Induced Diseases encompasses all aspects of research related to the prevention and control of tobacco use at a global level. Preventing diseases attributable to tobacco is only one aspect of the journal, whose overall scope is to provide a forum for the publication of research articles that can contribute to reducing the burden of tobacco induced diseases globally. To address this epidemic we believe that there must be an avenue for the publication of research/policy activities on tobacco control initiatives that may be very important at a regional and national level. This approach provides a very important "hands on" service to the tobacco control community at a global scale - as common problems have common solutions. Hence, we see ourselves as "connectors" within this global community. The journal hence encourages the submission of articles from all medical, biological and psychosocial disciplines, ranging from medical and dental clinicians, through health professionals to basic biomedical and clinical scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信