机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗老年和年轻患者的局部肾肿块:围手术期结果的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Alejandro Calvillo-Ramirez, Lauren Chew, Jessica Edith Acevedo-Rodriguez, Andrea G Palacios-Navas, Carlos E Vidal-Valderrama, Lee Ponsky, Randy Vince
{"title":"机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗老年和年轻患者的局部肾肿块:围手术期结果的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Alejandro Calvillo-Ramirez, Lauren Chew, Jessica Edith Acevedo-Rodriguez, Andrea G Palacios-Navas, Carlos E Vidal-Valderrama, Lee Ponsky, Randy Vince","doi":"10.1007/s00345-025-05712-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is an established treatment modality for localized renal masses (LRMs). Nevertheless, its applicability in aging populations presents unique challenges, with limited existing evidence. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of RAPN for LRMs in elderly patients compared to younger individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases were searched until August 2024 to identify articles comparing RAPN outcomes in elderly and younger patients. Studies were stratified based on age cutoffs for older individuals. Three primary cutoffs were employed for subgroup analysis: 70-74, 75-79, and ≥ 80 years old. Primary outcomes included the incidence of any grade and major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) and trifecta achievement. Odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) were used for statistical comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies comprising 5,937 patients were included. A significantly higher incidence of any grade complications was observed in elderly patients (OR 1.38 [95%confidence interval [CI] 1.03, 1.84], p = 0.02). However, there was no difference in major complications (OR 1.32 [95%CI 0.79, 2.18], p = 0.28) or trifecta achievement (OR 1.02 [95%CI 0.83, 1.25], p = 0.84) between elderly and younger patients. Similarly, estimated blood loss, transfusion rates, positive surgical margins, and operative time were comparable between groups. Notably, elderly individuals had a shorter warm ischemia time (MD -1.59 [95%CI -2.40, -0.79], p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RAPN appears to be a viable treatment option for well-selected elderly patients with LRMs who are candidates for active treatment. While elderly patients experienced higher rates of minor complications, major complications and trifecta achievement were comparable to those of younger patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"335"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for localized renal masses in elderly and younger patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Alejandro Calvillo-Ramirez, Lauren Chew, Jessica Edith Acevedo-Rodriguez, Andrea G Palacios-Navas, Carlos E Vidal-Valderrama, Lee Ponsky, Randy Vince\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00345-025-05712-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is an established treatment modality for localized renal masses (LRMs). Nevertheless, its applicability in aging populations presents unique challenges, with limited existing evidence. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of RAPN for LRMs in elderly patients compared to younger individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases were searched until August 2024 to identify articles comparing RAPN outcomes in elderly and younger patients. Studies were stratified based on age cutoffs for older individuals. Three primary cutoffs were employed for subgroup analysis: 70-74, 75-79, and ≥ 80 years old. Primary outcomes included the incidence of any grade and major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) and trifecta achievement. Odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) were used for statistical comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies comprising 5,937 patients were included. A significantly higher incidence of any grade complications was observed in elderly patients (OR 1.38 [95%confidence interval [CI] 1.03, 1.84], p = 0.02). However, there was no difference in major complications (OR 1.32 [95%CI 0.79, 2.18], p = 0.28) or trifecta achievement (OR 1.02 [95%CI 0.83, 1.25], p = 0.84) between elderly and younger patients. Similarly, estimated blood loss, transfusion rates, positive surgical margins, and operative time were comparable between groups. Notably, elderly individuals had a shorter warm ischemia time (MD -1.59 [95%CI -2.40, -0.79], p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RAPN appears to be a viable treatment option for well-selected elderly patients with LRMs who are candidates for active treatment. While elderly patients experienced higher rates of minor complications, major complications and trifecta achievement were comparable to those of younger patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"335\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05712-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05712-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RAPN)是治疗局部肾肿块(lrm)的一种成熟的治疗方式。然而,其在老龄化人口中的适用性提出了独特的挑战,现有证据有限。本荟萃分析旨在评估RAPN治疗老年lrm患者的安全性和可行性,并与年轻人进行比较。方法:检索数据库,直到2024年8月,以确定比较老年和年轻患者RAPN结果的文章。研究是根据老年人的年龄界限进行分层的。亚组分析采用三个主要临界值:70-74岁、75-79岁和≥80岁。主要结局包括任何级别和主要并发症(Clavien-Dindo≥3)的发生率和三联体的实现。采用优势比(OR)和平均差异(MD)进行统计学比较。结果:纳入了7项研究,包括5,937例患者。老年患者任何级别并发症的发生率均明显高于老年患者(OR 1.38[95%可信区间[CI] 1.03, 1.84], p = 0.02)。然而,老年和年轻患者的主要并发症(OR 1.32 [95%CI 0.79, 2.18], p = 0.28)和三联效(OR 1.02 [95%CI 0.83, 1.25], p = 0.84)没有差异。同样,两组之间的估计失血量、输血率、阳性手术切缘和手术时间具有可比性。值得注意的是,老年人的热缺血时间更短(MD -1.59 [95%CI -2.40, -0.79], p)。结论:对于经过精心挑选的老年lrm患者,RAPN似乎是一种可行的治疗选择,这些患者可以接受积极治疗。虽然老年患者的轻微并发症发生率较高,但主要并发症和三联体成就与年轻患者相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for localized renal masses in elderly and younger patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes.

Purpose: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is an established treatment modality for localized renal masses (LRMs). Nevertheless, its applicability in aging populations presents unique challenges, with limited existing evidence. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of RAPN for LRMs in elderly patients compared to younger individuals.

Methods: Databases were searched until August 2024 to identify articles comparing RAPN outcomes in elderly and younger patients. Studies were stratified based on age cutoffs for older individuals. Three primary cutoffs were employed for subgroup analysis: 70-74, 75-79, and ≥ 80 years old. Primary outcomes included the incidence of any grade and major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) and trifecta achievement. Odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) were used for statistical comparisons.

Results: Seven studies comprising 5,937 patients were included. A significantly higher incidence of any grade complications was observed in elderly patients (OR 1.38 [95%confidence interval [CI] 1.03, 1.84], p = 0.02). However, there was no difference in major complications (OR 1.32 [95%CI 0.79, 2.18], p = 0.28) or trifecta achievement (OR 1.02 [95%CI 0.83, 1.25], p = 0.84) between elderly and younger patients. Similarly, estimated blood loss, transfusion rates, positive surgical margins, and operative time were comparable between groups. Notably, elderly individuals had a shorter warm ischemia time (MD -1.59 [95%CI -2.40, -0.79], p < 0.001).

Conclusions: RAPN appears to be a viable treatment option for well-selected elderly patients with LRMs who are candidates for active treatment. While elderly patients experienced higher rates of minor complications, major complications and trifecta achievement were comparable to those of younger patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信