Auke Jelsma, Stéphanie Dijkstra, Sietske Wiemer, Astrid Vellinga, Mariken de Koning, Wiepke Cahn, Claudia Simons, Marieke van der Pluijm, Lieuwe de Haan
{"title":"精神分裂症谱系障碍患者、兄弟姐妹和对照组自我报告的自我困扰现象与个人康复的关系","authors":"Auke Jelsma, Stéphanie Dijkstra, Sietske Wiemer, Astrid Vellinga, Mariken de Koning, Wiepke Cahn, Claudia Simons, Marieke van der Pluijm, Lieuwe de Haan","doi":"10.1159/000546557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Self-disturbance phenomena are increasingly recognized as fundamental and debilitating features for patients with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD). The concept of personal recovery describes the process of building a meaningful and satisfying life despite persistent symptoms or challenges related to mental illness. No previous study has investigated the association between self-disturbance phenomena and personal recovery in patients with SSD. Understanding the impact of self-disturbance could strengthen the therapeutic alliance with patients and contribute to the development of treatment strategies supporting their recovery.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate whether severity of self-reported self-disturbance phenomena is associated with the level of self-reported personal recovery in patients with SSD, their unaffected siblings and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a cross-sectional design with 522 patients with SSD, 608 unaffected siblings and 369 healthy controls, the frequency and distress of self-disturbance phenomena was measured with the Self-Experience Lifetime Frequency Scale (SELF). Personal recovery was assessed with the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS-24). Spearman's rank correlation coefficients between both scales were examined. Subsequent multiple hierarchical regression analyses were conducted to assess additional explained variance in personal recovery by severity of self-disturbance phenomena, adjusting for positive, negative and general symptomatology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant correlations were reported between higher SELF and lower RAS-24 scores for patients (ρ = -0.20, p < 0.001), siblings (ρ = -0.24, p < 0.001) and controls (ρ = -0.16, p < 0.005). The severity of self-disturbance phenomena significantly albeit modestly predicted total personal recovery score after adjusting for positive, negative and general symptoms for patients (R2 Change = 0.035, β = -0.19, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current findings suggest that self-reported self-disturbance phenomena are relevant for the personal recovery of patients with SSD. Healthcare practitioners are urged for attention to patients' first-person perspectives, including experiences of self-disturbance.</p>","PeriodicalId":20723,"journal":{"name":"Psychopathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Association between Self-Reported Self-Disturbance Phenomena and Personal Recovery in Patients with a Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder, Siblings and Controls.\",\"authors\":\"Auke Jelsma, Stéphanie Dijkstra, Sietske Wiemer, Astrid Vellinga, Mariken de Koning, Wiepke Cahn, Claudia Simons, Marieke van der Pluijm, Lieuwe de Haan\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000546557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Self-disturbance phenomena are increasingly recognized as fundamental and debilitating features for patients with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD). The concept of personal recovery describes the process of building a meaningful and satisfying life despite persistent symptoms or challenges related to mental illness. No previous study has investigated the association between self-disturbance phenomena and personal recovery in patients with SSD. Understanding the impact of self-disturbance could strengthen the therapeutic alliance with patients and contribute to the development of treatment strategies supporting their recovery.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate whether severity of self-reported self-disturbance phenomena is associated with the level of self-reported personal recovery in patients with SSD, their unaffected siblings and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a cross-sectional design with 522 patients with SSD, 608 unaffected siblings and 369 healthy controls, the frequency and distress of self-disturbance phenomena was measured with the Self-Experience Lifetime Frequency Scale (SELF). Personal recovery was assessed with the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS-24). Spearman's rank correlation coefficients between both scales were examined. Subsequent multiple hierarchical regression analyses were conducted to assess additional explained variance in personal recovery by severity of self-disturbance phenomena, adjusting for positive, negative and general symptomatology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant correlations were reported between higher SELF and lower RAS-24 scores for patients (ρ = -0.20, p < 0.001), siblings (ρ = -0.24, p < 0.001) and controls (ρ = -0.16, p < 0.005). The severity of self-disturbance phenomena significantly albeit modestly predicted total personal recovery score after adjusting for positive, negative and general symptoms for patients (R2 Change = 0.035, β = -0.19, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current findings suggest that self-reported self-disturbance phenomena are relevant for the personal recovery of patients with SSD. Healthcare practitioners are urged for attention to patients' first-person perspectives, including experiences of self-disturbance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychopathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546557\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546557","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
自我干扰现象越来越被认为是精神分裂症谱系障碍(SSD)患者的基本和衰弱特征。个人康复的概念描述了在精神疾病持续出现症状或挑战的情况下,建立有意义和满意的生活的过程。此前没有研究调查SSD患者自我干扰现象与个人恢复之间的关系。了解自我困扰的影响可以加强与患者的治疗联盟,并有助于制定支持其康复的治疗策略。目的:探讨SSD患者、其未受影响的兄弟姐妹和健康对照者自我报告的个人恢复水平与自我报告的自我困扰现象的严重程度是否相关。方法:采用自我体验终生频率量表(SELF - experience Lifetime frequency Scale, SELF)对522例SSD患者、608例未患兄弟姐妹和369名健康对照进行自我困扰的频率和困扰程度的测量。采用恢复评估量表(RAS-24)评估个人恢复。检验两个量表之间的Spearman等级相关系数。随后进行多重层次回归分析,以评估自我干扰现象严重程度对个人恢复的额外解释方差,调整阳性、阴性和一般症状。结果:在患者(ρ = -0.20, p < 0.001)、兄弟姐妹(ρ = -0.24, p < 0.001)和对照组(ρ = -0.16, p < 0.005)中,较高的SELF与较低的RAS-24评分之间存在显著相关性。自我困扰现象的严重程度在调整阳性、阴性和一般症状后显著(尽管适度)预测个人恢复总分(R2变化= 0.035,β = -0.19, p < 0.001)。结论:目前的研究结果表明,自我报告的自我困扰现象与SSD患者的个人康复有关。医疗从业者被敦促关注患者的第一人称视角,包括自我困扰的经历。
The Association between Self-Reported Self-Disturbance Phenomena and Personal Recovery in Patients with a Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder, Siblings and Controls.
Introduction: Self-disturbance phenomena are increasingly recognized as fundamental and debilitating features for patients with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD). The concept of personal recovery describes the process of building a meaningful and satisfying life despite persistent symptoms or challenges related to mental illness. No previous study has investigated the association between self-disturbance phenomena and personal recovery in patients with SSD. Understanding the impact of self-disturbance could strengthen the therapeutic alliance with patients and contribute to the development of treatment strategies supporting their recovery.
Aim: To investigate whether severity of self-reported self-disturbance phenomena is associated with the level of self-reported personal recovery in patients with SSD, their unaffected siblings and healthy controls.
Methods: In a cross-sectional design with 522 patients with SSD, 608 unaffected siblings and 369 healthy controls, the frequency and distress of self-disturbance phenomena was measured with the Self-Experience Lifetime Frequency Scale (SELF). Personal recovery was assessed with the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS-24). Spearman's rank correlation coefficients between both scales were examined. Subsequent multiple hierarchical regression analyses were conducted to assess additional explained variance in personal recovery by severity of self-disturbance phenomena, adjusting for positive, negative and general symptomatology.
Results: Significant correlations were reported between higher SELF and lower RAS-24 scores for patients (ρ = -0.20, p < 0.001), siblings (ρ = -0.24, p < 0.001) and controls (ρ = -0.16, p < 0.005). The severity of self-disturbance phenomena significantly albeit modestly predicted total personal recovery score after adjusting for positive, negative and general symptoms for patients (R2 Change = 0.035, β = -0.19, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Current findings suggest that self-reported self-disturbance phenomena are relevant for the personal recovery of patients with SSD. Healthcare practitioners are urged for attention to patients' first-person perspectives, including experiences of self-disturbance.
期刊介绍:
''Psychopathology'' is a record of research centered on findings, concepts, and diagnostic categories of phenomenological, experimental and clinical psychopathology. Studies published are designed to improve and deepen the knowledge and understanding of the pathogenesis and nature of psychopathological symptoms and psychological dysfunctions. Furthermore, the validity of concepts applied in the neurosciences of mental functions are evaluated in order to closely bring together the mind and the brain. Major topics of the journal are trajectories between biological processes and psychological dysfunction that can help us better understand a subject’s inner experiences and interpersonal behavior. Descriptive psychopathology, experimental psychopathology and neuropsychology, developmental psychopathology, transcultural psychiatry as well as philosophy-based phenomenology contribute to this field.