日本老龄化人口多学科、多设施姑息治疗中预先护理计划实践的障碍和促进因素:定性分析。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-05-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0323976
Mariko Tanimoto, Norihiro Okamura, Kaku Sawada, Tomofumi Igarashi, Mitsunori Nishikawa
{"title":"日本老龄化人口多学科、多设施姑息治疗中预先护理计划实践的障碍和促进因素:定性分析。","authors":"Mariko Tanimoto, Norihiro Okamura, Kaku Sawada, Tomofumi Igarashi, Mitsunori Nishikawa","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0323976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Globally, multi-disciplinary advance care planning (ACP) in multi-facility settings for aging communities is essential; however, it does not consistently yield the desired outcomes. Japan's population is rapidly aging; nonetheless, no studies have examined comprehensive ACP implementation by diverse professionals across various community healthcare facilities. Within the context of an aging community, this study aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators to ACP implementation by multiple professionals in various healthcare facilities. A qualitative research design was employed. The study participants included 22 multidisciplinary members of a community-based palliative care (CBPC) team. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted between September and October 2019. A total of 19 barriers and 19 facilitators were identified and categorized into seven practice domains: \"Understanding patients' intentions,\" \"Family support,\" \"Information sharing using tools,\" \"Collaboration among multiple professions,\" \"Cross-facility and cross-departmental cooperation,\" \"Raising awareness in the community,\" and \"Efforts by implementation promoters and their departments.\" Barriers included \"Inability to understand the patient's intentions,\" \"Physical and psychological distance between patient and family,\" and \"Different information needs and sharing methods at each facility,\" among others. Facilitators included \"Skills for better understanding the true meaning of patients' intentions,\" \"Compatibility of daily tasks and ACP by utilizing tools,\" \"Human connections between professionals in multiple facilities and departments,\" and \"Engagement with ACP implementation,\" among others. The study identified important domains for practical ACP implementation using a community-based palliative care team collaborating across multiple community facilities, as well as the barriers and facilitators. The findings indicate that multi-disciplinary, multi-facility ACP implementation in regions with aging populations requires establishing a regional collaborative network system and a human network. Healthcare professionals must develop practical ACP experience to identify its benefits while enhancing their skills as \"advocates.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 5","pages":"e0323976"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12118854/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and facilitators of advance care planning practices in multi-disciplinary, multi-facility palliative care for Japan's aging population: A qualitative analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mariko Tanimoto, Norihiro Okamura, Kaku Sawada, Tomofumi Igarashi, Mitsunori Nishikawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0323976\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Globally, multi-disciplinary advance care planning (ACP) in multi-facility settings for aging communities is essential; however, it does not consistently yield the desired outcomes. Japan's population is rapidly aging; nonetheless, no studies have examined comprehensive ACP implementation by diverse professionals across various community healthcare facilities. Within the context of an aging community, this study aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators to ACP implementation by multiple professionals in various healthcare facilities. A qualitative research design was employed. The study participants included 22 multidisciplinary members of a community-based palliative care (CBPC) team. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted between September and October 2019. A total of 19 barriers and 19 facilitators were identified and categorized into seven practice domains: \\\"Understanding patients' intentions,\\\" \\\"Family support,\\\" \\\"Information sharing using tools,\\\" \\\"Collaboration among multiple professions,\\\" \\\"Cross-facility and cross-departmental cooperation,\\\" \\\"Raising awareness in the community,\\\" and \\\"Efforts by implementation promoters and their departments.\\\" Barriers included \\\"Inability to understand the patient's intentions,\\\" \\\"Physical and psychological distance between patient and family,\\\" and \\\"Different information needs and sharing methods at each facility,\\\" among others. Facilitators included \\\"Skills for better understanding the true meaning of patients' intentions,\\\" \\\"Compatibility of daily tasks and ACP by utilizing tools,\\\" \\\"Human connections between professionals in multiple facilities and departments,\\\" and \\\"Engagement with ACP implementation,\\\" among others. The study identified important domains for practical ACP implementation using a community-based palliative care team collaborating across multiple community facilities, as well as the barriers and facilitators. The findings indicate that multi-disciplinary, multi-facility ACP implementation in regions with aging populations requires establishing a regional collaborative network system and a human network. Healthcare professionals must develop practical ACP experience to identify its benefits while enhancing their skills as \\\"advocates.\\\"</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 5\",\"pages\":\"e0323976\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12118854/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323976\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323976","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球范围内,针对老年社区的多设施环境中的多学科预先护理规划(ACP)至关重要;然而,它并不总是产生预期的结果。日本人口正在迅速老龄化;然而,没有研究对不同社区医疗机构中不同专业人员的全面ACP实施情况进行调查。在老龄化社区的背景下,本研究旨在确定不同医疗机构中多名专业人员实施ACP的障碍和促进因素。本研究采用质性研究设计。研究参与者包括22名社区姑息治疗(CBPC)团队的多学科成员。个别半结构化访谈于2019年9月至10月进行。共确定了19个障碍和19个促进因素,并将其分为七个实践领域:“理解患者意图”、“家庭支持”、“使用工具的信息共享”、“多专业协作”、“跨设施和跨部门合作”、“提高社区意识”和“实施促进者及其部门的努力”。障碍包括“无法理解患者的意图”、“患者与家属之间的生理和心理距离”、“每个机构的信息需求和共享方法不同”等。辅助因素包括“更好地理解患者意图的真正含义的技能”,“通过使用工具使日常任务和ACP兼容”,“多个设施和部门的专业人员之间的人际关系”以及“参与ACP的实施”等。该研究确定了在多个社区设施中使用基于社区的姑息治疗团队实施实际ACP的重要领域,以及障碍和促进因素。研究结果表明,在人口老龄化地区实施多学科、多设施的ACP需要建立区域协作网络系统和人力网络。医疗保健专业人员必须发展实际的ACP经验,以确定其好处,同时提高他们作为“倡导者”的技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Barriers and facilitators of advance care planning practices in multi-disciplinary, multi-facility palliative care for Japan's aging population: A qualitative analysis.

Barriers and facilitators of advance care planning practices in multi-disciplinary, multi-facility palliative care for Japan's aging population: A qualitative analysis.

Barriers and facilitators of advance care planning practices in multi-disciplinary, multi-facility palliative care for Japan's aging population: A qualitative analysis.

Barriers and facilitators of advance care planning practices in multi-disciplinary, multi-facility palliative care for Japan's aging population: A qualitative analysis.

Globally, multi-disciplinary advance care planning (ACP) in multi-facility settings for aging communities is essential; however, it does not consistently yield the desired outcomes. Japan's population is rapidly aging; nonetheless, no studies have examined comprehensive ACP implementation by diverse professionals across various community healthcare facilities. Within the context of an aging community, this study aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators to ACP implementation by multiple professionals in various healthcare facilities. A qualitative research design was employed. The study participants included 22 multidisciplinary members of a community-based palliative care (CBPC) team. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted between September and October 2019. A total of 19 barriers and 19 facilitators were identified and categorized into seven practice domains: "Understanding patients' intentions," "Family support," "Information sharing using tools," "Collaboration among multiple professions," "Cross-facility and cross-departmental cooperation," "Raising awareness in the community," and "Efforts by implementation promoters and their departments." Barriers included "Inability to understand the patient's intentions," "Physical and psychological distance between patient and family," and "Different information needs and sharing methods at each facility," among others. Facilitators included "Skills for better understanding the true meaning of patients' intentions," "Compatibility of daily tasks and ACP by utilizing tools," "Human connections between professionals in multiple facilities and departments," and "Engagement with ACP implementation," among others. The study identified important domains for practical ACP implementation using a community-based palliative care team collaborating across multiple community facilities, as well as the barriers and facilitators. The findings indicate that multi-disciplinary, multi-facility ACP implementation in regions with aging populations requires establishing a regional collaborative network system and a human network. Healthcare professionals must develop practical ACP experience to identify its benefits while enhancing their skills as "advocates."

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信