高敏c反应蛋白与白蛋白比值与冠心病患者全因死亡和心脏性死亡的关系:一项回顾性NHANES研究

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-05-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0322281
Shangxun Zhou, Miaohan Qiu, Kexin Wang, Yixuan Duan, Daoshen Liu, Ying Xu, Xuefei Mu, Jing Li, Yi Li, Yaling Han
{"title":"高敏c反应蛋白与白蛋白比值与冠心病患者全因死亡和心脏性死亡的关系:一项回顾性NHANES研究","authors":"Shangxun Zhou, Miaohan Qiu, Kexin Wang, Yixuan Duan, Daoshen Liu, Ying Xu, Xuefei Mu, Jing Li, Yi Li, Yaling Han","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0322281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This research aimed to explore the association of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) with death events in community-based patients with coronary heart disease (CHD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>624 CHD participants were followed for 36 months using data from the 2015-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). The CAR was dichotomized at 0.075 mg/g to stratify inflammation levels. Relationships between CAR, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), albumin (ALB) and all-cause and cardiac death in all participants and subgroups were analyzed using restricted cubic spline (RCS), Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both CAR and hsCRP showed positive correlations with all-cause and cardiac death risk while ALB exhibited a U-shaped correlation with all-cause death risk but a negative correlation with cardiac death risk. The high-CAR group had higher risks of all-cause (P = 0.04) and cardiac death (P = 0.02). The hazard ratios (HR) (95% confidence intervals (CI)) for all-cause death was 1.77 (1.15-2.74) (P = 0.010), while it was 2.99 (1.44-6.22) (P = 0.003) for cardiac death. No significant interaction was observed in subgroup analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A CAR threshold of 0.075 mg/g effectively distinguished between high and low inflammation risks. Elevated CAR significantly increased the risk of all-cause and cardiac death in community CHD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 5","pages":"e0322281"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12119015/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein to albumin ratio with all-cause and cardiac death in coronary heart disease individuals: A retrospective NHANES study.\",\"authors\":\"Shangxun Zhou, Miaohan Qiu, Kexin Wang, Yixuan Duan, Daoshen Liu, Ying Xu, Xuefei Mu, Jing Li, Yi Li, Yaling Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0322281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This research aimed to explore the association of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) with death events in community-based patients with coronary heart disease (CHD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>624 CHD participants were followed for 36 months using data from the 2015-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). The CAR was dichotomized at 0.075 mg/g to stratify inflammation levels. Relationships between CAR, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), albumin (ALB) and all-cause and cardiac death in all participants and subgroups were analyzed using restricted cubic spline (RCS), Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both CAR and hsCRP showed positive correlations with all-cause and cardiac death risk while ALB exhibited a U-shaped correlation with all-cause death risk but a negative correlation with cardiac death risk. The high-CAR group had higher risks of all-cause (P = 0.04) and cardiac death (P = 0.02). The hazard ratios (HR) (95% confidence intervals (CI)) for all-cause death was 1.77 (1.15-2.74) (P = 0.010), while it was 2.99 (1.44-6.22) (P = 0.003) for cardiac death. No significant interaction was observed in subgroup analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A CAR threshold of 0.075 mg/g effectively distinguished between high and low inflammation risks. Elevated CAR significantly increased the risk of all-cause and cardiac death in community CHD patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 5\",\"pages\":\"e0322281\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12119015/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322281\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322281","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在探讨社区冠心病(CHD)患者高敏c反应蛋白与白蛋白比(CAR)与死亡事件的关系。方法:使用2015-2018年国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的数据,对624名冠心病患者进行了36个月的随访。CAR在0.075 mg/g水平上进行二分类,以分层炎症水平。使用限制性三次样条(RCS)、Kaplan-Meier生存曲线和Cox比例风险模型分析所有参与者和亚组中CAR、高敏c反应蛋白(hsCRP)、白蛋白(ALB)与全因和心脏性死亡之间的关系。结果:CAR和hsCRP与全因死亡风险和心源性死亡风险呈正相关,ALB与全因死亡风险呈u型相关,与心源性死亡风险呈负相关。高car组的全因死亡(P = 0.04)和心源性死亡(P = 0.02)风险较高。全因死亡的危险比(HR)(95%可信区间(CI)为1.77 (1.15-2.74)(P = 0.010),心源性死亡的危险比(HR)为2.99 (1.44-6.22)(P = 0.003)。在亚组分析中未观察到显著的相互作用。结论:0.075 mg/g的CAR阈值可有效区分高、低炎症风险。CAR升高显著增加社区冠心病患者全因死亡和心源性死亡的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein to albumin ratio with all-cause and cardiac death in coronary heart disease individuals: A retrospective NHANES study.

Background: This research aimed to explore the association of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) with death events in community-based patients with coronary heart disease (CHD).

Methods: 624 CHD participants were followed for 36 months using data from the 2015-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). The CAR was dichotomized at 0.075 mg/g to stratify inflammation levels. Relationships between CAR, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), albumin (ALB) and all-cause and cardiac death in all participants and subgroups were analyzed using restricted cubic spline (RCS), Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models.

Results: Both CAR and hsCRP showed positive correlations with all-cause and cardiac death risk while ALB exhibited a U-shaped correlation with all-cause death risk but a negative correlation with cardiac death risk. The high-CAR group had higher risks of all-cause (P = 0.04) and cardiac death (P = 0.02). The hazard ratios (HR) (95% confidence intervals (CI)) for all-cause death was 1.77 (1.15-2.74) (P = 0.010), while it was 2.99 (1.44-6.22) (P = 0.003) for cardiac death. No significant interaction was observed in subgroup analyses.

Conclusions: A CAR threshold of 0.075 mg/g effectively distinguished between high and low inflammation risks. Elevated CAR significantly increased the risk of all-cause and cardiac death in community CHD patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信