比较51Cr-EDTA和99mtc - dtpa清除率在肿瘤患者肾小球滤过率测量中的人群药代动力学方法

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric Nephrology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-29 DOI:10.1007/s00467-025-06828-9
Matthieu Gracia, Victoire Ankaoua, Mathieu Alonso, Marlène Pasquet, Etienne Chatelut
{"title":"比较51Cr-EDTA和99mtc - dtpa清除率在肿瘤患者肾小球滤过率测量中的人群药代动力学方法","authors":"Matthieu Gracia, Victoire Ankaoua, Mathieu Alonso, Marlène Pasquet, Etienne Chatelut","doi":"10.1007/s00467-025-06828-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong><sup>51</sup>Cr-EDTA and <sup>99 m</sup>Tc-DTPA clearances are two reference methods of determining the glomerular filtration rate. The study aimed to compare these two radioisotopic clearance measurements using an original approach based on population pharmacokinetics in oncopediatrics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Plasma concentrations of <sup>51</sup>Cr-EDTA and <sup>99 m</sup>Tc-DTPA obtained from, respectively, 40 and 19 children treated with nephrotoxic chemotherapy were simultaneously analyzed while accounting for three covariates (i.e., serum creatinine, plasma cystatin C, body weight) previously described as being related to the pediatric glomerular filtration rate. A binary covariate \"GFR measurement\" (MES = 0 or 1, respectively, for <sup>51</sup>Cr-EDTA or <sup>99 m</sup>Tc-DTPA) was added to the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis revealed a non-significant bias (± 95% CI) of - 0.9% ± 11.4% between the two measurements (with <sup>99 m</sup>Tc-DTPA clearance overestimated).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This result confirmed that both radioisotopic clearances are equivalent in pediatrics, as has been reported in the literature on adults based on intrapatient comparisons. The value of the population approach in comparing the pharmacokinetics of two different compounds is thus demonstrated.</p>","PeriodicalId":19735,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"3163-3168"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12401762/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A population pharmacokinetic approach to compare <sup>51</sup>Cr-EDTA and <sup>99 m</sup>Tc-DTPA clearances in measuring renal glomerular filtration rate in oncopediatrics.\",\"authors\":\"Matthieu Gracia, Victoire Ankaoua, Mathieu Alonso, Marlène Pasquet, Etienne Chatelut\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00467-025-06828-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong><sup>51</sup>Cr-EDTA and <sup>99 m</sup>Tc-DTPA clearances are two reference methods of determining the glomerular filtration rate. The study aimed to compare these two radioisotopic clearance measurements using an original approach based on population pharmacokinetics in oncopediatrics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Plasma concentrations of <sup>51</sup>Cr-EDTA and <sup>99 m</sup>Tc-DTPA obtained from, respectively, 40 and 19 children treated with nephrotoxic chemotherapy were simultaneously analyzed while accounting for three covariates (i.e., serum creatinine, plasma cystatin C, body weight) previously described as being related to the pediatric glomerular filtration rate. A binary covariate \\\"GFR measurement\\\" (MES = 0 or 1, respectively, for <sup>51</sup>Cr-EDTA or <sup>99 m</sup>Tc-DTPA) was added to the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis revealed a non-significant bias (± 95% CI) of - 0.9% ± 11.4% between the two measurements (with <sup>99 m</sup>Tc-DTPA clearance overestimated).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This result confirmed that both radioisotopic clearances are equivalent in pediatrics, as has been reported in the literature on adults based on intrapatient comparisons. The value of the population approach in comparing the pharmacokinetics of two different compounds is thus demonstrated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19735,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Nephrology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3163-3168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12401762/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-025-06828-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-025-06828-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:51Cr-EDTA和99mtc - dtpa清除率是测定肾小球滤过率的两种参考方法。该研究旨在比较这两种放射性同位素清除率测量,使用基于肿瘤医学群体药代动力学的原始方法。方法:同时分析40名和19名接受肾毒性化疗的儿童的51Cr-EDTA和99mtc - dtpa的血浆浓度,同时考虑三个协变量(即血清肌酐、血浆胱抑素C和体重),这些协变量之前被认为与儿童肾小球滤过率有关。在模型中加入了一个二元协变量“GFR测量”(对于51Cr-EDTA或99mtc - dtpa, MES分别为0或1)。结果:分析显示,两次测量之间的无显著偏差(±95% CI)为- 0.9%±11.4%(高估99mtc - dtpa清除率)。结论:这一结果证实,两种放射性同位素清除率在儿科是相同的,正如文献中基于患者内比较的成人报道。因此,群体方法在比较两种不同化合物的药代动力学方面的价值得到了证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A population pharmacokinetic approach to compare <sup>51</sup>Cr-EDTA and <sup>99 m</sup>Tc-DTPA clearances in measuring renal glomerular filtration rate in oncopediatrics.

A population pharmacokinetic approach to compare <sup>51</sup>Cr-EDTA and <sup>99 m</sup>Tc-DTPA clearances in measuring renal glomerular filtration rate in oncopediatrics.

A population pharmacokinetic approach to compare 51Cr-EDTA and 99 mTc-DTPA clearances in measuring renal glomerular filtration rate in oncopediatrics.

Background: 51Cr-EDTA and 99 mTc-DTPA clearances are two reference methods of determining the glomerular filtration rate. The study aimed to compare these two radioisotopic clearance measurements using an original approach based on population pharmacokinetics in oncopediatrics.

Methods: Plasma concentrations of 51Cr-EDTA and 99 mTc-DTPA obtained from, respectively, 40 and 19 children treated with nephrotoxic chemotherapy were simultaneously analyzed while accounting for three covariates (i.e., serum creatinine, plasma cystatin C, body weight) previously described as being related to the pediatric glomerular filtration rate. A binary covariate "GFR measurement" (MES = 0 or 1, respectively, for 51Cr-EDTA or 99 mTc-DTPA) was added to the model.

Results: Analysis revealed a non-significant bias (± 95% CI) of - 0.9% ± 11.4% between the two measurements (with 99 mTc-DTPA clearance overestimated).

Conclusions: This result confirmed that both radioisotopic clearances are equivalent in pediatrics, as has been reported in the literature on adults based on intrapatient comparisons. The value of the population approach in comparing the pharmacokinetics of two different compounds is thus demonstrated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Nephrology
Pediatric Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: International Pediatric Nephrology Association Pediatric Nephrology publishes original clinical research related to acute and chronic diseases that affect renal function, blood pressure, and fluid and electrolyte disorders in children. Studies may involve medical, surgical, nutritional, physiologic, biochemical, genetic, pathologic or immunologic aspects of disease, imaging techniques or consequences of acute or chronic kidney disease. There are 12 issues per year that contain Editorial Commentaries, Reviews, Educational Reviews, Original Articles, Brief Reports, Rapid Communications, Clinical Quizzes, and Letters to the Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信