{"title":"角膜和上皮厚度测量:两种不同眼相干断层扫描设备的可比性。","authors":"Burcu Yakut, Anika Förster, Burkhard Dick, Suphi Taneri","doi":"10.1055/a-2558-8789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Corneal and epithelial thickness maps obtained with high-frequency ultrasound were first used to diagnose keratoconus. Anterior segment OCT has recently become widely used in many conditions especially in preoperative planning before refractive surgery, keratoconus diagnosis, keratoconus progression monitoring, hydrops formation, and epithelial healing monitoring. We compare epithelial and pachymetric thickness-based parameters from two different Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices as to whether they can be used interchangeably.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, comparative chart review. This study comprises 24 normal consecutive eyes and 32 consecutive post-SMILE eyes with corneal thickness and epithelial thickness maps obtained using two different OCT devices (Cirrus 5000, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Germany and Avanti RTVue 100, OptoVue Inc., USA). The following common parameters in the print-out of the two OCT devices were examined: minimum corneal thickness (Pachy min), minimum corneal thickness minus median corneal thickness (Pachy min-med), average corneal thickness of the superonasal octant minus the average corneal thickness of the inferotemporal octant (Pachy SN-IT), average corneal thickness of the superior octant minus average corneal thickness of the inferior octant (Pachy S-I), minimum epithelial thickness (Epi min), and maximum epithelial thickness (Epi max).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pachy min and Epi max measurements matched well between the two devices (ICC at 0.906 and 0.839, respectively). We found a significant correlation in Pachy min (<i>p</i> = 0.040), Pachy min-med (<i>p</i> = 0.033), and Epi max (<i>p</i> < 0.001) in the normal eye group. Only Pachy min and Epi max measurements (<i>p</i> < 0.001 for both) exhibited a significant correlation between the two devices in the post-SMILE group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anterior segment OCT is a valuable method for evaluating quantitative corneal and epithelial thickness measurements. However, measurements may differ between devices, and they should not be used interchangeably.</p>","PeriodicalId":17904,"journal":{"name":"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corneal and Epithelial Thickness Measurements: Comparability between two Different Ocular Coherence Tomography Devices.\",\"authors\":\"Burcu Yakut, Anika Förster, Burkhard Dick, Suphi Taneri\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2558-8789\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Corneal and epithelial thickness maps obtained with high-frequency ultrasound were first used to diagnose keratoconus. Anterior segment OCT has recently become widely used in many conditions especially in preoperative planning before refractive surgery, keratoconus diagnosis, keratoconus progression monitoring, hydrops formation, and epithelial healing monitoring. We compare epithelial and pachymetric thickness-based parameters from two different Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices as to whether they can be used interchangeably.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, comparative chart review. This study comprises 24 normal consecutive eyes and 32 consecutive post-SMILE eyes with corneal thickness and epithelial thickness maps obtained using two different OCT devices (Cirrus 5000, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Germany and Avanti RTVue 100, OptoVue Inc., USA). The following common parameters in the print-out of the two OCT devices were examined: minimum corneal thickness (Pachy min), minimum corneal thickness minus median corneal thickness (Pachy min-med), average corneal thickness of the superonasal octant minus the average corneal thickness of the inferotemporal octant (Pachy SN-IT), average corneal thickness of the superior octant minus average corneal thickness of the inferior octant (Pachy S-I), minimum epithelial thickness (Epi min), and maximum epithelial thickness (Epi max).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pachy min and Epi max measurements matched well between the two devices (ICC at 0.906 and 0.839, respectively). We found a significant correlation in Pachy min (<i>p</i> = 0.040), Pachy min-med (<i>p</i> = 0.033), and Epi max (<i>p</i> < 0.001) in the normal eye group. Only Pachy min and Epi max measurements (<i>p</i> < 0.001 for both) exhibited a significant correlation between the two devices in the post-SMILE group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anterior segment OCT is a valuable method for evaluating quantitative corneal and epithelial thickness measurements. However, measurements may differ between devices, and they should not be used interchangeably.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2558-8789\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2558-8789","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Corneal and Epithelial Thickness Measurements: Comparability between two Different Ocular Coherence Tomography Devices.
Background: Corneal and epithelial thickness maps obtained with high-frequency ultrasound were first used to diagnose keratoconus. Anterior segment OCT has recently become widely used in many conditions especially in preoperative planning before refractive surgery, keratoconus diagnosis, keratoconus progression monitoring, hydrops formation, and epithelial healing monitoring. We compare epithelial and pachymetric thickness-based parameters from two different Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices as to whether they can be used interchangeably.
Methods: Retrospective, comparative chart review. This study comprises 24 normal consecutive eyes and 32 consecutive post-SMILE eyes with corneal thickness and epithelial thickness maps obtained using two different OCT devices (Cirrus 5000, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Germany and Avanti RTVue 100, OptoVue Inc., USA). The following common parameters in the print-out of the two OCT devices were examined: minimum corneal thickness (Pachy min), minimum corneal thickness minus median corneal thickness (Pachy min-med), average corneal thickness of the superonasal octant minus the average corneal thickness of the inferotemporal octant (Pachy SN-IT), average corneal thickness of the superior octant minus average corneal thickness of the inferior octant (Pachy S-I), minimum epithelial thickness (Epi min), and maximum epithelial thickness (Epi max).
Results: Pachy min and Epi max measurements matched well between the two devices (ICC at 0.906 and 0.839, respectively). We found a significant correlation in Pachy min (p = 0.040), Pachy min-med (p = 0.033), and Epi max (p < 0.001) in the normal eye group. Only Pachy min and Epi max measurements (p < 0.001 for both) exhibited a significant correlation between the two devices in the post-SMILE group.
Conclusion: Anterior segment OCT is a valuable method for evaluating quantitative corneal and epithelial thickness measurements. However, measurements may differ between devices, and they should not be used interchangeably.
期刊介绍:
-Konzentriertes Fachwissen aus Klinik und Praxis:
Die entscheidenden Ergebnisse der internationalen Forschung - für Sie auf den Punkt gebracht und kritisch kommentiert,
Übersichtsarbeiten zu den maßgeblichen Themen der täglichen Praxis,
Top informiert - breite klinische Berichterstattung.
-CME-Punkte sammeln mit dem Refresher:
Effiziente, CME-zertifizierte Fortbildung, mit dem Refresher,
3 CME-Punkte pro Ausgabe - bis zu 36 CME-Punkte im Jahr!.
-Aktuelle Rubriken mit echtem Nutzwert:
Kurzreferate zu den wichtigsten Artikeln internationaler Zeitschriften,
Schwerpunktthema in jedem Heft: Ausführliche Übersichtsarbeiten zu den wichtigsten Themen der Ophthalmologie – so behalten Sie das gesamte Fach im Blick!,
Originalien mit den neuesten Entwicklungen,
Übersichten zu den relevanten Themen.