角膜和上皮厚度测量:两种不同眼相干断层扫描设备的可比性。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Burcu Yakut, Anika Förster, Burkhard Dick, Suphi Taneri
{"title":"角膜和上皮厚度测量:两种不同眼相干断层扫描设备的可比性。","authors":"Burcu Yakut, Anika Förster, Burkhard Dick, Suphi Taneri","doi":"10.1055/a-2558-8789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Corneal and epithelial thickness maps obtained with high-frequency ultrasound were first used to diagnose keratoconus. Anterior segment OCT has recently become widely used in many conditions especially in preoperative planning before refractive surgery, keratoconus diagnosis, keratoconus progression monitoring, hydrops formation, and epithelial healing monitoring. We compare epithelial and pachymetric thickness-based parameters from two different Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices as to whether they can be used interchangeably.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, comparative chart review. This study comprises 24 normal consecutive eyes and 32 consecutive post-SMILE eyes with corneal thickness and epithelial thickness maps obtained using two different OCT devices (Cirrus 5000, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Germany and Avanti RTVue 100, OptoVue Inc., USA). The following common parameters in the print-out of the two OCT devices were examined: minimum corneal thickness (Pachy min), minimum corneal thickness minus median corneal thickness (Pachy min-med), average corneal thickness of the superonasal octant minus the average corneal thickness of the inferotemporal octant (Pachy SN-IT), average corneal thickness of the superior octant minus average corneal thickness of the inferior octant (Pachy S-I), minimum epithelial thickness (Epi min), and maximum epithelial thickness (Epi max).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pachy min and Epi max measurements matched well between the two devices (ICC at 0.906 and 0.839, respectively). We found a significant correlation in Pachy min (<i>p</i> = 0.040), Pachy min-med (<i>p</i> = 0.033), and Epi max (<i>p</i> < 0.001) in the normal eye group. Only Pachy min and Epi max measurements (<i>p</i> < 0.001 for both) exhibited a significant correlation between the two devices in the post-SMILE group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anterior segment OCT is a valuable method for evaluating quantitative corneal and epithelial thickness measurements. However, measurements may differ between devices, and they should not be used interchangeably.</p>","PeriodicalId":17904,"journal":{"name":"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corneal and Epithelial Thickness Measurements: Comparability between two Different Ocular Coherence Tomography Devices.\",\"authors\":\"Burcu Yakut, Anika Förster, Burkhard Dick, Suphi Taneri\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2558-8789\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Corneal and epithelial thickness maps obtained with high-frequency ultrasound were first used to diagnose keratoconus. Anterior segment OCT has recently become widely used in many conditions especially in preoperative planning before refractive surgery, keratoconus diagnosis, keratoconus progression monitoring, hydrops formation, and epithelial healing monitoring. We compare epithelial and pachymetric thickness-based parameters from two different Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices as to whether they can be used interchangeably.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, comparative chart review. This study comprises 24 normal consecutive eyes and 32 consecutive post-SMILE eyes with corneal thickness and epithelial thickness maps obtained using two different OCT devices (Cirrus 5000, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Germany and Avanti RTVue 100, OptoVue Inc., USA). The following common parameters in the print-out of the two OCT devices were examined: minimum corneal thickness (Pachy min), minimum corneal thickness minus median corneal thickness (Pachy min-med), average corneal thickness of the superonasal octant minus the average corneal thickness of the inferotemporal octant (Pachy SN-IT), average corneal thickness of the superior octant minus average corneal thickness of the inferior octant (Pachy S-I), minimum epithelial thickness (Epi min), and maximum epithelial thickness (Epi max).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pachy min and Epi max measurements matched well between the two devices (ICC at 0.906 and 0.839, respectively). We found a significant correlation in Pachy min (<i>p</i> = 0.040), Pachy min-med (<i>p</i> = 0.033), and Epi max (<i>p</i> < 0.001) in the normal eye group. Only Pachy min and Epi max measurements (<i>p</i> < 0.001 for both) exhibited a significant correlation between the two devices in the post-SMILE group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anterior segment OCT is a valuable method for evaluating quantitative corneal and epithelial thickness measurements. However, measurements may differ between devices, and they should not be used interchangeably.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2558-8789\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2558-8789","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:高频超声获得的角膜和上皮厚度图首次用于圆锥角膜的诊断。近年来,前段OCT已广泛应用于屈光手术前的术前规划、圆锥角膜诊断、圆锥角膜进展监测、积液形成和上皮愈合监测等方面。我们比较了来自两种不同的傅里叶域光学相干断层扫描(OCT)设备的上皮和厚层厚度参数,以确定它们是否可以互换使用。方法:回顾性比较图表法。本研究包括24只正常的连续眼睛和32只连续的smile后眼睛,使用两种不同的OCT设备(Cirrus 5000,卡尔蔡司Meditec,德国和Avanti RTVue 100, OptoVue Inc,美国)获得角膜厚度和上皮厚度图。检查了两种OCT设备打印输出中的以下常见参数:最小角膜厚度(Pachy min)、最小角膜厚度减去中位角膜厚度(Pachy min-med)、鼻上八分区的平均角膜厚度减去颞下八分区的平均角膜厚度(Pachy SN-IT)、上八分区的平均角膜厚度减去下八分区的平均角膜厚度(Pachy S-I)、最小上皮厚度(Epi min)和最大上皮厚度(Epi max)。结果:Pachy min和Epi max测量值在两种设备之间匹配良好(ICC分别为0.906和0.839)。我们发现Pachy min (p = 0.040)、Pachy min-med (p = 0.033)和Epi max (p = 0.033)具有显著相关性。结论:前段OCT是定量评价角膜和上皮厚度的一种有价值的方法。然而,不同设备之间的测量值可能不同,它们不应该互换使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Corneal and Epithelial Thickness Measurements: Comparability between two Different Ocular Coherence Tomography Devices.

Background: Corneal and epithelial thickness maps obtained with high-frequency ultrasound were first used to diagnose keratoconus. Anterior segment OCT has recently become widely used in many conditions especially in preoperative planning before refractive surgery, keratoconus diagnosis, keratoconus progression monitoring, hydrops formation, and epithelial healing monitoring. We compare epithelial and pachymetric thickness-based parameters from two different Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices as to whether they can be used interchangeably.

Methods: Retrospective, comparative chart review. This study comprises 24 normal consecutive eyes and 32 consecutive post-SMILE eyes with corneal thickness and epithelial thickness maps obtained using two different OCT devices (Cirrus 5000, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Germany and Avanti RTVue 100, OptoVue Inc., USA). The following common parameters in the print-out of the two OCT devices were examined: minimum corneal thickness (Pachy min), minimum corneal thickness minus median corneal thickness (Pachy min-med), average corneal thickness of the superonasal octant minus the average corneal thickness of the inferotemporal octant (Pachy SN-IT), average corneal thickness of the superior octant minus average corneal thickness of the inferior octant (Pachy S-I), minimum epithelial thickness (Epi min), and maximum epithelial thickness (Epi max).

Results: Pachy min and Epi max measurements matched well between the two devices (ICC at 0.906 and 0.839, respectively). We found a significant correlation in Pachy min (p = 0.040), Pachy min-med (p = 0.033), and Epi max (p < 0.001) in the normal eye group. Only Pachy min and Epi max measurements (p < 0.001 for both) exhibited a significant correlation between the two devices in the post-SMILE group.

Conclusion: Anterior segment OCT is a valuable method for evaluating quantitative corneal and epithelial thickness measurements. However, measurements may differ between devices, and they should not be used interchangeably.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
235
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: -Konzentriertes Fachwissen aus Klinik und Praxis: Die entscheidenden Ergebnisse der internationalen Forschung - für Sie auf den Punkt gebracht und kritisch kommentiert, Übersichtsarbeiten zu den maßgeblichen Themen der täglichen Praxis, Top informiert - breite klinische Berichterstattung. -CME-Punkte sammeln mit dem Refresher: Effiziente, CME-zertifizierte Fortbildung, mit dem Refresher, 3 CME-Punkte pro Ausgabe - bis zu 36 CME-Punkte im Jahr!. -Aktuelle Rubriken mit echtem Nutzwert: Kurzreferate zu den wichtigsten Artikeln internationaler Zeitschriften, Schwerpunktthema in jedem Heft: Ausführliche Übersichtsarbeiten zu den wichtigsten Themen der Ophthalmologie – so behalten Sie das gesamte Fach im Blick!, Originalien mit den neuesten Entwicklungen, Übersichten zu den relevanten Themen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信