在荷兰语境下定义再适应:一个修正的德尔菲研究。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Pub Date : 2025-05-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S522161
Lise Elisabeth Buma, Ines Mouchaers, Sandra M G Zwakhalen, Stan Vluggen, Ton Satink, Silke F Metzelthin
{"title":"在荷兰语境下定义再适应:一个修正的德尔菲研究。","authors":"Lise Elisabeth Buma, Ines Mouchaers, Sandra M G Zwakhalen, Stan Vluggen, Ton Satink, Silke F Metzelthin","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S522161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>For the past decade, the Netherlands has been developing and implementing reablement programs to promote independence and to empower older adults' autonomy. However, a key challenge remains the lack of clarity around the definition of reablement and its relations to usual care practices. Existing international definitions lack specificity to account for contextual differences, such as variations in healthcare systems and cultural norms. An operational definition is needed that not only fits the Dutch health and social care system and incorporates context-specific elements. This study extends the original conceptual definition by integrating these elements, offering clearer, more practical guidance for real-world application.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A modified Delphi study was performed to develop a definition of reablement that fits the Dutch health and social care system, extending beyond conceptual understanding. The study comprised three expert rounds and three Delphi survey rounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 139 participants from Dutch health and social care, education, research, and representatives of clients and informal caregivers, participated. They evaluated statements in four sections: the target group, aims, type of care or support, and characteristics of reablement programs. Key discussions during the expert rounds focused mainly on 1) the target group, emphasizing the importance of involving individuals and their families, and 2) the characteristics of reablement, such as coordinating roles, team composition, and size. Input from the Delphi surveys and expert rounds led to the development of an operational definition for the Dutch context, agreed upon by 81% of stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Delphi methodology proved valuable in identifying context-specific elements and incorporating expert perspectives, creating a culturally and contextually sensitive definition. This definition distinguishes itself from the international version by offering practical guidance on areas of application and interventions, with a focus on promoting social participation, well-being, and the involvement of the individual's social network.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"18 ","pages":"2859-2873"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12118488/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining Reablement in the Dutch Context: A Modified Delphi Study.\",\"authors\":\"Lise Elisabeth Buma, Ines Mouchaers, Sandra M G Zwakhalen, Stan Vluggen, Ton Satink, Silke F Metzelthin\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JMDH.S522161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>For the past decade, the Netherlands has been developing and implementing reablement programs to promote independence and to empower older adults' autonomy. However, a key challenge remains the lack of clarity around the definition of reablement and its relations to usual care practices. Existing international definitions lack specificity to account for contextual differences, such as variations in healthcare systems and cultural norms. An operational definition is needed that not only fits the Dutch health and social care system and incorporates context-specific elements. This study extends the original conceptual definition by integrating these elements, offering clearer, more practical guidance for real-world application.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A modified Delphi study was performed to develop a definition of reablement that fits the Dutch health and social care system, extending beyond conceptual understanding. The study comprised three expert rounds and three Delphi survey rounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 139 participants from Dutch health and social care, education, research, and representatives of clients and informal caregivers, participated. They evaluated statements in four sections: the target group, aims, type of care or support, and characteristics of reablement programs. Key discussions during the expert rounds focused mainly on 1) the target group, emphasizing the importance of involving individuals and their families, and 2) the characteristics of reablement, such as coordinating roles, team composition, and size. Input from the Delphi surveys and expert rounds led to the development of an operational definition for the Dutch context, agreed upon by 81% of stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Delphi methodology proved valuable in identifying context-specific elements and incorporating expert perspectives, creating a culturally and contextually sensitive definition. This definition distinguishes itself from the international version by offering practical guidance on areas of application and interventions, with a focus on promoting social participation, well-being, and the involvement of the individual's social network.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"2859-2873\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12118488/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S522161\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S522161","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在过去的十年中,荷兰一直在制定和实施康复方案,以促进老年人的独立性和自主权。然而,一个关键的挑战仍然是康复的定义及其与常规护理做法的关系缺乏明确性。现有的国际定义缺乏特异性,无法解释背景差异,例如卫生保健系统和文化规范的差异。需要一个可操作的定义,不仅适合荷兰的卫生和社会保健系统,而且纳入具体情况的因素。本研究通过整合这些元素扩展了原有的概念定义,为现实世界的应用提供了更清晰、更实用的指导。材料和方法:进行了一项修正的德尔菲研究,以制定符合荷兰卫生和社会保健系统的可实现性定义,超出概念理解。研究包括三轮专家调查和三轮德尔菲调查。结果:共有139名来自荷兰卫生和社会护理、教育、研究的参与者以及客户和非正式护理人员的代表参加了调查。他们从四个方面对陈述进行评估:目标群体、目标、护理或支持的类型以及康复计划的特点。专家轮次期间的关键讨论主要集中在1)目标群体,强调涉及个人及其家庭的重要性,以及2)可实现的特征,例如协调角色,团队组成和规模。德尔菲调查和专家轮次的输入导致了荷兰背景下的操作定义的发展,81%的利益相关者同意。结论:德尔菲方法被证明在识别特定环境因素和纳入专家观点,创建文化和上下文敏感的定义方面是有价值的。该定义与国际版本的不同之处在于,它为应用和干预领域提供了实际指导,重点是促进社会参与、福祉和个人社会网络的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Defining Reablement in the Dutch Context: A Modified Delphi Study.

Introduction: For the past decade, the Netherlands has been developing and implementing reablement programs to promote independence and to empower older adults' autonomy. However, a key challenge remains the lack of clarity around the definition of reablement and its relations to usual care practices. Existing international definitions lack specificity to account for contextual differences, such as variations in healthcare systems and cultural norms. An operational definition is needed that not only fits the Dutch health and social care system and incorporates context-specific elements. This study extends the original conceptual definition by integrating these elements, offering clearer, more practical guidance for real-world application.

Materials and methods: A modified Delphi study was performed to develop a definition of reablement that fits the Dutch health and social care system, extending beyond conceptual understanding. The study comprised three expert rounds and three Delphi survey rounds.

Results: A total of 139 participants from Dutch health and social care, education, research, and representatives of clients and informal caregivers, participated. They evaluated statements in four sections: the target group, aims, type of care or support, and characteristics of reablement programs. Key discussions during the expert rounds focused mainly on 1) the target group, emphasizing the importance of involving individuals and their families, and 2) the characteristics of reablement, such as coordinating roles, team composition, and size. Input from the Delphi surveys and expert rounds led to the development of an operational definition for the Dutch context, agreed upon by 81% of stakeholders.

Conclusion: The Delphi methodology proved valuable in identifying context-specific elements and incorporating expert perspectives, creating a culturally and contextually sensitive definition. This definition distinguishes itself from the international version by offering practical guidance on areas of application and interventions, with a focus on promoting social participation, well-being, and the involvement of the individual's social network.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信