ERS/ATS 2022支气管扩张剂反应指南对哮喘控制的影响

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY
Clara Seghers Carreras, Miguel Jiménez Gómez, Begoña Peña Del Cura, Lucía Ortega Ruíz, Fernando Vargas Ursúa, Cristina Martín-Arriscado Arroba, Carlos Melero Moreno, Rocío Magdalena Díaz Campos
{"title":"ERS/ATS 2022支气管扩张剂反应指南对哮喘控制的影响","authors":"Clara Seghers Carreras, Miguel Jiménez Gómez, Begoña Peña Del Cura, Lucía Ortega Ruíz, Fernando Vargas Ursúa, Cristina Martín-Arriscado Arroba, Carlos Melero Moreno, Rocío Magdalena Díaz Campos","doi":"10.1080/02770903.2025.2513060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether the bronchodilator response (BDR) according to the new cutoff values is associated with worse asthma control compared with the 2005 definition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective study on moderate to severe asthma patients under clinical follow-up. Patients were classified based on the BDR using both ERS/ATS 2022 and 2005 thresholds. We collected clinical and functional data, along with exacerbations over a one-year follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 198 patients included, mean age was 60.2 years-old (SD 16.3), with 74.7% being women and 69.7% having severe asthma. According to the 2005 threshold, 46 (23.2%) showed bronchodilator responsiveness, whereas with the 2022 recommendations decreased to 38 (19.2%). The agreement between the 2005 and 2022 ERS/ATS criteria for BDR positivity was 92.17%, with a Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.76 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Using the 2022 cutoff values, patients with BDR had a significantly lower mean asthma control test score (19.9 vs 22.5; <i>p</i> = 0.001), while no difference was observed with the 2005 criteria. The relative risk of exacerbations after one year follow-up was 1.23 (CI 95% 1-1.25) with the 2022 recommendations, compared to 1.09 (CI 95% 0.88-1.38) with the 2005 criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of the new BDR criteria could provide a valuable marker of asthma control, allowing for better risk stratification and more informed therapeutic decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of ERS/ATS 2022 bronchodilator response guidelines in asthma control.\",\"authors\":\"Clara Seghers Carreras, Miguel Jiménez Gómez, Begoña Peña Del Cura, Lucía Ortega Ruíz, Fernando Vargas Ursúa, Cristina Martín-Arriscado Arroba, Carlos Melero Moreno, Rocío Magdalena Díaz Campos\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02770903.2025.2513060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether the bronchodilator response (BDR) according to the new cutoff values is associated with worse asthma control compared with the 2005 definition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective study on moderate to severe asthma patients under clinical follow-up. Patients were classified based on the BDR using both ERS/ATS 2022 and 2005 thresholds. We collected clinical and functional data, along with exacerbations over a one-year follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 198 patients included, mean age was 60.2 years-old (SD 16.3), with 74.7% being women and 69.7% having severe asthma. According to the 2005 threshold, 46 (23.2%) showed bronchodilator responsiveness, whereas with the 2022 recommendations decreased to 38 (19.2%). The agreement between the 2005 and 2022 ERS/ATS criteria for BDR positivity was 92.17%, with a Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.76 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Using the 2022 cutoff values, patients with BDR had a significantly lower mean asthma control test score (19.9 vs 22.5; <i>p</i> = 0.001), while no difference was observed with the 2005 criteria. The relative risk of exacerbations after one year follow-up was 1.23 (CI 95% 1-1.25) with the 2022 recommendations, compared to 1.09 (CI 95% 0.88-1.38) with the 2005 criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of the new BDR criteria could provide a valuable marker of asthma control, allowing for better risk stratification and more informed therapeutic decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Asthma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Asthma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2025.2513060\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asthma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2025.2513060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是确定与2005年的定义相比,根据新的临界值的BDR是否与更差的哮喘控制有关。我们对中重度哮喘患者进行了临床随访的前瞻性研究。采用ERS/ATS 2022和2005阈值根据BDR对患者进行分类。我们收集了临床和功能数据,以及一年随访期间的恶化情况。198例患者平均年龄60.2岁(SD 16.3),其中74.7%为女性,69.7%为重度哮喘。根据2005年的阈值,46人(23.2%)表现出支气管扩张剂反应,而2022年的建议减少到38人(19.2%)。2005年和2022年ERS/ATS标准对BDR阳性的一致性为92.17%,Cohen’s kappa系数为0.76 (p < 0.001)。使用2022年的临界值,BDR患者的平均哮喘控制测试(ACT)评分显着降低(19.9 vs 22.5;P = 0.001),而与2005年的标准没有观察到差异。2022年推荐标准随访1年后病情恶化的相对风险为1.23 (CI 95% 1-1.25),而2005年标准随访1年后病情恶化的相对风险为1.09 (CI 95% 0.88- 1.38)。使用新的BDR标准可以提供一个有价值的哮喘控制标志,允许更好的风险分层和更明智的治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of ERS/ATS 2022 bronchodilator response guidelines in asthma control.

Objective: To determine whether the bronchodilator response (BDR) according to the new cutoff values is associated with worse asthma control compared with the 2005 definition.

Methods: Prospective study on moderate to severe asthma patients under clinical follow-up. Patients were classified based on the BDR using both ERS/ATS 2022 and 2005 thresholds. We collected clinical and functional data, along with exacerbations over a one-year follow-up period.

Results: Among the 198 patients included, mean age was 60.2 years-old (SD 16.3), with 74.7% being women and 69.7% having severe asthma. According to the 2005 threshold, 46 (23.2%) showed bronchodilator responsiveness, whereas with the 2022 recommendations decreased to 38 (19.2%). The agreement between the 2005 and 2022 ERS/ATS criteria for BDR positivity was 92.17%, with a Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.76 (p < 0.001). Using the 2022 cutoff values, patients with BDR had a significantly lower mean asthma control test score (19.9 vs 22.5; p = 0.001), while no difference was observed with the 2005 criteria. The relative risk of exacerbations after one year follow-up was 1.23 (CI 95% 1-1.25) with the 2022 recommendations, compared to 1.09 (CI 95% 0.88-1.38) with the 2005 criteria.

Conclusions: The use of the new BDR criteria could provide a valuable marker of asthma control, allowing for better risk stratification and more informed therapeutic decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Asthma
Journal of Asthma 医学-过敏
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Providing an authoritative open forum on asthma and related conditions, Journal of Asthma publishes clinical research around such topics as asthma management, critical and long-term care, preventative measures, environmental counselling, and patient education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信